It should be illegal to redact anything in an environmental assessment. It would be good to find out who ordered the redactions and why. ORES needs to be defunded and sunsetted.
This is quite extraordinary.
For what reason would the government have to continuously redact a six-year-old document, with interaction between a certain Ms Campbell, a certain Mr Scott Morrison and Stuart Robert?
FOI 26-3115 - Document Pack righttoknow.org.au/request/1…
They have released a little more but to say that it may cause individuals 'anxiety' seems to be - irregular. And not a good reason for saying no to the release of public documents.
But I do so like a good little mystery. FOI 26-3115 - Notice of Decision righttoknow.org.au/request/1…
Anxiety?
Then only redact the minors in the files and release everything else, democrats and MAGA alike. Everyone. But you won’t. Why? You fucking know why. Everyone does.
I’m not and pretty soon my last name will be public on this account. I simply redact out of habit, but my prior obfuscation was because I worked for Netflix and HR kept nitpicking my posts.
spotted on vibecuterie: Predact by @predactapp
Automatically redact sensitive data before using AI models. mac Desktop Redaction that runs offline.
built with Svelte, Tauri
check it out below ↓
❗️Carro: I'll give you some time to redact. They are all going to be unsealed [except for redactions]
ADA: Are you unsealing the emails?
Carro: Yes.
ADA: On trial date, I expect the defense to try to delay the September 8 trial date
From your article:
“Exactly one minute later, Einhorn edited the post, to redact Franco’s surname from the screenshot.”
So yes, Austin was indeed doxxed.
Justice Carro: I'll give you some time to redact. They are all going to be unsealed [except for redactions]
ADA: Are you unsealing the emails?
Justice Carro: Yes.
ADA: On trial date, I expect the defense to try to delay the September 8 trial date