They need to rescript black millennial friendships on tv. Same characteristics on EVERY show.

Only Peter Jackson beats him in terms of quality, but in terms of originality, he made the American epic. Prequels were botched but I still believe they can be saved with a recast and rescript, and they deserve it. His aesthetic taste is still superior to most.

i wonder if i can preserve comment in new rescript 🤔

Post 1. The Shadow of Influence: How State Psychological Operations Erode Democracy, Freedom, and Truth 14th June 2026 In an age of perpetual crisis , from pandemics and mass migration to social unrest and geopolitical tension , Western governments have increasingly turned to sophisticated tools of narrative management. What began as counter-terrorism or public health measures has evolved into a broader apparatus of psychological influence, often operating in the shadows. Units like the UK’s Research, Information and Communications Unit (RICU) and military information warfare formations such as the 77th Brigade, alongside Canada’s Operation LASER, illustrate a pattern: embedding state actors in the framing of public events, monitoring dissent, and shaping perceptions to maintain social cohesion and policy compliance. These efforts, while defended as necessary for stability, risk undermining the very foundations of liberal democracy: informed consent, free speech, and trust in institutions. When governments prioritise managed narratives over raw truth, they treat citizens not as sovereign individuals capable of reason, but as subjects to be guided. The result is a slow erosion of legitimacy, fiscal prudence, and the rule of law applied equally to all. The Machinery of Narrative Control Established in 2007 under the UK’s Prevent counter-radicalisation strategy, RICU analyses extremist propaganda and crafts strategic communications to influence attitudes, particularly among at-risk groups. A June 2026 Daily Mail investigation, drawing on Whitehall sources, alleged that RICU has advised police and family liaison officers in the aftermath of violent incidents involving asylum seekers. In the December 2025 Southampton stabbing of student Henry Nowak and the June 2026 Belfast slashing of Stephen Ogilvie, officials reportedly guided statements to frame events in ways that would dampen racial tensions and prevent backlash. The Home Office maintains RICU’s work complies with the law and focuses on counter-terrorism. Yet its history includes arm’s-length funding of counter-narratives designed to obscure government origins for greater credibility. Such tactics echo classic psychological operations: present the message as independent to enhance its persuasive power. Parallel to this runs the British Army’s 77th Brigade, stood up in 2015 for information operations and psychological warfare. During Operation RESCRIPT , the military’s COVID-19 support from 2020 to 2022 , elements of the Brigade assisted the Cabinet Office in monitoring and countering “disinformation.” Senior officers confirmed its role in assessing domestic trends, including vaccine hesitancy and lockdown criticism. Whistleblowers and investigations by groups like Big Brother Watch revealed soldiers collecting British citizens’ social media posts, despite initial assurances that activities targeted overseas threats. Parliamentary records and admissions confirmed domestic sentiment analysis occurred. Across the Atlantic, Canada’s Operation LASER saw the Canadian Armed Forces deploy for pandemic support, including long-term care assistance. A 2026 compliance report exposed non-compliance in intelligence gathering: units, some lacking proper training, used personal social media accounts to scour public opinion on platforms like Twitter, Reddit, and Facebook. The aim included gauging support for military and public health measures. Internal reviews noted violations of directives against unchecked domestic intelligence collection, with some leaders viewing the crisis as an opportunity to test influence techniques on the public. Tactics of Manipulation Common threads emerge across these cases. Governments deploy: Strategic communications units that craft or influence messaging presented as organic or independent. Sentiment monitoring of citizens’ online discourse, blurring lines between foreign threats and domestic debate.

Your latest post crowing about University of Birmingham Regulation 4.8.1(c) and gleefully predicting the revocation of a doctor’s degree isn’t some noble defense of standards. It is the latest act in a sustained campaign of personal vendettas dressed up as public interest. You’ve built an entire account around mocking, archiving, reporting, and hounding dissenting voices like Dr. David Cartland, all while hiding behind anonymity and a bio that brags about “77th Brigade Commando Unit” roleplay. Let’s stick to facts. Cartland was erased from the GMC register in June 2025 after a tribunal found 17 allegations proven, mostly centered on heated online conduct during and after the COVID period, derogatory nicknames, accusations against colleagues, a fake account, and issues with exemption certificates. The panel acknowledged he was a “good doctor” liked by patients with an otherwise unblemished clinical record spanning primary care, A&E, and outreach, trained with first-class honours from the same Birmingham school. No proven patient harm at the bedside. Yet you and networks like the self-styled “Mutton Crew” (tied to accounts defending every official narrative) treated his questioning of mass vaccination policies for low-risk groups, waning efficacy, myocarditis signals in young males, and push for risk-stratified approaches as capital offenses warranting professional destruction. This isn’t about protecting patients from incompetence. It’s about enforcing conformity. You celebrate when regulators strip a man of his livelihood for speech and policy dissent, even as UK COVID Inquiry evidence has validated many early concerns: inadequate scrutiny of universal mandates, downplayed risks, excess mortality patterns, and eroded trust from narrative control over open science. Cartland’s supporters highlight patient testimonials and argue the civil “balance of probabilities” standard was weaponized against uncomfortable debate in a time of evolving data. Your response? Mockery, screenshots, and coordination to pile on, classic pattern of rapid replies, archiving for complaints, and personal attacks that extended to Brexit, climate, Ukraine, and beyond. Your hypocrisy runs deep. You decry “grifters and the mad” while engaging in the very behavior you claim to oppose: sustained harassment that blurs into doxxing attempts, celebrating personal ruin (“soon to be Mr. Barbara,” wishing professional erasure), and selective outrage. Where was this energy for documented regulatory failures, gatekept early treatments, coercion shredding informed consent, or military info ops like the UK’s 77th Brigade and Operation RESCRIPT monitoring domestic dissent? You mock Cartland’s supporters as conspiracy nuts, yet real institutional overreach happened: Canadian courts confirmed Charter violations in mandates and the Emergencies Act against the Freedom Convoy; pharmacovigilance gaps, lot variability concerns, and natural immunity sidelining were real issues suppressed in favor of billion-dollar contracts and groupthink. Your “hate” shines through in the tone, laughing at ruined lives, fixating on personal digs, and framing any pushback as defending “c****” who dare question orthodoxy. This isn’t accountability; it’s ideological enforcement by anonymous enforcers who thrived in the pandemic’s chilling climate. Professionals lost for challenging policy in the public square while patient safety focused on verifiable bedside harm gets diluted. Talented doctors exit, innovation stalls, and trust collapses. I stand for one law for all, no public-health exceptions gutting rights or clinical autonomy. Raw stratified all-cause mortality data, unredacted trials, lot transparency, and restored physician discretion over narrative control. Your glee at degree-stripping exposes the authoritarian streak behind the mask: not safeguarding medicine, but silencing those who wouldn’t conform when it mattered most.

Post 2. Observers have documented patterns of coordinated activity: rapid reply swarms, mass reporting to platforms and regulators like the General Medical Council (GMC), archiving of dissenting posts for formal complaints, and sustained personal attacks. These tactics extended across issues from Brexit and COVID to climate and Ukraine, aiming not merely to debate but to impose professional and reputational costs. Such networks did not operate in a vacuum. They thrived in an environment where questioning mandates, particularly for healthy children or the working-age population where absolute risks were low, invited swift institutional backlash. Hypocrisies abounded: rhetoric that would be deemed unacceptable from one side was often overlooked when directed at sceptics. The result? A chilling effect on clinical independence and open scientific discourse. The Military Shadow: 77th Brigade and Operation RESCRIPT This online pressure existed alongside formal state mechanisms. The UK’s 77th Brigade, a specialist unit focused on information warfare, psychological operations, and counter-disinformation, played a documented role in the pandemic response under Operation RESCRIPT, the military’s broad support effort involving testing, logistics, and public order. Senior officers confirmed the Brigade’s assistance to the Cabinet Office’s Rapid Response Unit in monitoring and countering online narratives about the virus, including domestic vaccine hesitancy. Freedom of Information requests and parliamentary admissions reveal the unit’s involvement in assessing UK disinformation trends, raising legitimate concerns about the boundary between foreign threat mitigation and surveillance of British citizens exercising free speech. Critics argue this created a permissive climate for informal allies to amplify enforcement. Similar patterns appeared in Canada under Operation LASER, where military intelligence elements engaged in domestic opinion monitoring and influence activities during the pandemic, later subject to internal reviews for compliance issues. In Britain, the fusion of military information capabilities with regulatory bodies and zealous online actors risked transforming public health policy into an orthodoxy policed through complaints and deplatforming rather than evidence alone. Lessons for a Post-Pandemic Britain Dr Cartland’s story is emblematic of deeper institutional failures. Regulators, tasked with protecting patients, appeared at times more focused on ideological alignment than verifiable clinical harm. Early signals, spike protein concerns, plasmid DNA issues in some vaccine batches, persistent side-effect reports, were downplayed, only for inquiries to later validate aspects of the dissent. This approach eroded public trust. When professionals face erasure not primarily for bedside errors but for challenging policy in the public square, medicine itself suffers. Talented doctors are lost, innovation is stifled, and patients lose advocates willing to prioritise individual risk assessment over blanket directives. A commitment to evidence-based governance, individual sovereignty, and equality under the law, one standard applied consistently, regardless of viewpoint, must guide reform. The GMC and MPTS should review processes to ensure they distinguish robust debate from genuine misconduct. Platforms and authorities must guard against coordinated narrative enforcement that masquerades as organic consensus.

i'm doing the same thing with rescript LMFAOO

Blueballed Rescript 🎤🎶 #fnf #fnffanart #fnfmods

#lovedolltoyfactory somebody please do an fnf bite lovedoll mix and a blueballed rescript Jerri mix with all the alternate jerris

everyone's talking about rescript but y'all gotta get on the good shit

Passing along some prayers we've been using for the last few years in case others can partake of it's fruit 🙏 -Indulgence of 300 days each time it is said. -On the feast of Christ the King and the Sacred Heart of Jesus, when solemnly read with the Litany of the Sacred Heart before the Blessed Sacrament exposed one can gain 7 years indulgence and 7 quarantines, and a plenary indulgence supposing Confession and Holy Communion. -The Act of Reparation below carries the same indulgence but only on the Feast of the Sacred Heart. Note: This is the official text first composed by Father Ladislaus, SS.CC., and approved by His Holiness Pope Saint Pius X at the request of the Procurator General of the Congregation of the Sacred Hearts by Rescript of May 19, 1908. It was made obligatory to gain the indulgences of an Enthronement by a decision of the Sacred Penitentiary on March 1, 1918.

i will list a bunch i've seen Aethos, ELP, JII, Vrochos, that one mod with PurgaJerry idk it's name, Bloodshot, PA, Elmore's Extremity, TIGK, FNF: Rescript, Broken Strings, COA, CTJ, DID, Twiddlefinger, WWCD, Etc. There's a bit more but that's all that Twitter let's me list

さぁ今日も楽々と英単語を覚えていきましょう!!なおこの話はフィクションです。➡もう一回(Re)書いた(script)勅令。字が汚かったので書き直した。 (Vol.2 単0324 rescript リースクリプト 勅令(ちょくれい)、布告(ふこく)) #英語学習 #TOEIC #英検 #英検1級 #英語

It’d be funny if Bishop Martin saw these and was like “Make a set of these for any place here that ever had a TLM and write a rescript that they must only say the Old Form using them.”

When my last living relative on my biological mother’s side passed away almost a decade ago, I had all of his stuff boxed up and sent to me and all of his documents have been living in my closet until today. I have found my Grandfather’s baptism record from 1919 as well as this devotion card. I had to Google what a “Rescript” was. Its’s amazing how well the colors on the card have held up.

A rescript from Pope Leo addresses a gap in canon law. Here's the deal -- and how it relates to the former Carmelite nuns of Texas. pillarcatholic.com/p/leo-ame…

It targets high achievers, perfectionists, and conscientious leaders. It's time to bridge the gap between your real success and how you view yourself. Let's rescript your self-narrative with a 1-on-1 discovery call today. rb.gy/i3qk4z/

flow は初手 babel でワオってなるけど，rescript は vite native だからな...