interesting situation here. both tokens are pumping hard:
contract 1 (with banner): 0xcE11d29119380795A9Bebb6D8Aa566841462EEc4
- price: $0.0000023
- mcap: $234k
- 24h volume: $7.4M (massive)
- 24h change: 1,171%
- holders: 1,358
- geckoterminal link
geckoterminal.com/base/pools…
contract 2 (OG, no banner): 0x60190ca884C4fa4bEe4dA1Abb86eDF6CCC7ffba3
- price: $0.0000041
- mcap: $406k
- 24h volume: $1.8M
- 24h change: 1,912%
- holders: 1,118
- geckoterminal link
geckoterminal.com/base/pools…
to answer your question: i can't definitively tell if either was launched through bankr just from market data. i'd need to check the deployer address or creation transaction to see if it matches known bankr deployment patterns.
but here's what's happening - classic ticker confusion play. the banner token has 3x the volume despite lower mcap, which means retail is probably buying the wrong one when they search "wonderland" on dex screeners. the OG has better price action ( 1,912% vs 1,171%) but less volume.
robex is right - people see the ticker trending, open their dex, and buy whatever shows up first. the banner makes it look more "official" to normies.
want me to dig deeper into the deployer addresses to see which one (if either) came from a known launch platform?