INTERACTIVE MAP OF Radiation Tracker World's/Radioactivity Environmental Monitoring Safecast simplemap.safecast.org Open,crowdsourced radiation data collected globally GiammaIoT2 x.com/search?q=from:@Gia… Live Monitoring Surveillance #sensor #probe #Nuclear Network Realtime

This is odd. Safecast shows very low levels of radiation in UAE that wasn't present before. Anyone have any ideas about this? map.safecast.org/?y=20.75&x=…

I am not here to trash $Cantina outright, but this is the truth from multiple whitehats who’ve hunted there. Cantina positions itself as the premium Web3 bug bounty platform AI spam filtering expert triage Spearbit backing promising high-signal reports and fewer headaches than the big general platforms. They host massive programs $Coinbase, dYdX $1M scopes, $Aave CTFs, etc. and pay out real money. That is why top researchers still show up. But the complaints are piling up, and they’re not just “tough triage.” They’re systemic issues that leave whitehats burned, valid critical bugs rejected with gaslighting, and protocols getting away with it. Here is what researchers are actually experiencing > Triage that defaults to the client’s perspective. Cantina’s own docs admit they “default to client’s perspective” in disputes. Mediation often downgrades critical findings e.g., monetary loss capped at Low severity even when the auditor showed clear fund loss risk). One firm documented ~104 judging errors in a single contest wrong dupes, invalid rejections, severity drops and still waited 8 months for resolution while token prices tanked and payouts shrank in value. > Rejections that look like gaslighting. The now-public CVE-2026-4931 case is the clearest example. Researcher submitted a critical integer truncation bug in Marginal V1 with mainnet fork PoC, EVM traces, video walkthrough, and exact SafeCast fix. Protocol emergency paused four days later, stealth patched the exact issue, then Cantina rejected it claiming impossible uses Gnosis Safe” and misidentified bytecode. Even after CERT/CC assigned the CVE (CVSS 9.1 Critical), radio silence from Cantina/Spearbit. Researchers call it straight-up denial to avoid payout. > Insane delays and ghosting on resolved findings. 8 month contest resolutions are not rare. Payouts drag even after mediation. One top auditor outperformed the leaderboard 3-7x in solo findings… then vowed never to return because the postcontest experience was “terrible.” > Reputation/signal penalties that punish edge cases. Like other platforms, rejections tank your signal score. But Cantina’s strict filtering (meant to kill spam) combined with sponsor-favoring verdicts makes it feel like the house always wins on close calls. > Fellowship exclusivity clauses that lock researchers in. Cantina Fellows can’t submit to other platforms or notify projects directly even if millions are at risk. All intel funnels through Cantina first. Bow down or leave energy. > Client scam allowance. Platforms like Immunefi will boot a sponsor after repeated non payment. Cantina reportedly allows sponsors 5 bounty scams per year before any real consequences. That’s not researcher first. Compare that to platforms with clearer SLAs (HackenProof-style fast triage payment timelines) or stricter sponsor accountability. Cantina’s “high-signal” model is great for protocols they get fewer noisy reports but it’s extracting value from the whitehat side. Simple fixes that would change everything: Enforce real mediation: one or two sponsor violations = removal. No more 5-scam allowance. •Independent appeal board (not defaulting to client view). •Require protocols to escrow full bounty pools upfront (like some competitions already do). •Publish transparent triage reasoning and let researchers challenge false bytecode/“impossible” claims with evidence. •Drop the aggressive exclusivity clauses and give Fellows actual freedom. •Public SLAs: triage in X days, mediation in Y days, payment in Z days after fix. No more 8-month black holes. Cantina pays some of the biggest Web3 bounties and has real expertise behind it. That is exactly why the space needs them to fix this. Right now the system is pushing good whitehats toward frustration, private disclosures, or worse and that hurts everyone who cares about on chain security.

NWO #Apocalypse Signals 1. ✅ Aviation - ADS-B Exchange (rich people fleeing) 2. ✅ Seismic - USGS Earthquake API 3. ✅ Solar - NOAA SWPC (flares, geomagnetic storms) 4. ✅ Radiation - Safecast Network 5. ✅ Asteroids - NASA NEO API 6. ✅ Pandemic - WHO/Global Health Observatory

Thanks @AzbyB, @safecast, and @jhelebrant SURO for the equipment received in 2022-23. We are still using it and teaching students about how to use it.

@canva You rejected the non-profit account for @safecast saying we have no online presence, yet we have a very active presence at safecast.org and social/github accounts going back 15 years. You emailed us telling us to "simply reply" but sent from a no-reply address.

For journalists and other curious people :) THE REID HOFFMAN FILES: GOVERNMENT EDITION -- SOURCE INDEX Every claim in the Government Edition is backed by a DOJ document, a government filing, or both. This companion post provides direct links and lookup instructions for every source cited. Verify everything yourself. SECTION I: THE TRUST NAMES Claim: Epstein emailed Hoffman a seven-point estate plan on December 28, 2013. DOJ: EFTA01752261 / EFTA00979879 / EFTA01944661 Link: justice.gov/d9/2024-12/DataS… Location: Search extracted text for "sharing not advising" or "pour over will" Also: EFTA00979884 (Hoffman's reply: "Very helpful. :) Thx. Did take notes.") Claim: Hoffman created the Aphorism Foundation, a $1.05B private foundation. IRS 990-PF: EIN 46-4347021 Link: projects.propublica.org/nonp… How to verify: Click any tax year. The 990-PF shows net assets, grants, officers. Raw IRS XML: pp990.s3.amazonaws.com/index… (search EIN 464347021) Claim: Hoffman's LinkedIn shares were held in "Reid Hoffman & Michelle Yee Living Trust." SEC Schedule 13G: LinkedIn Corp (CIK 0001271024) Link: sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar… How to verify: Click any SC 13G/A filing. The filer name is "Reid Hoffman & Michelle Yee Living Trust." The percent-of-class field shows 46.6% (2012) declining to 11.06% (2016). Claim: Hoffman became Director of BlockStream Corp in October 2014. SEC Form D: BlockStream Corp (CIK 0001632839) Link: sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar… How to verify: Open the Form D filing dated 2014-10-02. Related Persons section lists "Reid Hoffman -- Director." SECTION II: THE BLOCKSTREAM INVESTMENT Claim: Hoffman bumped Epstein's BlockStream allocation from $50K to $500K. DOJ: EFTA01917472 Link: justice.gov/d9/2024-12/DataS… Location: Search for "blockstream" or "50" near "500" Claim: Hoffman is listed as Director on BlockStream's SEC Form D. SEC Form D: BlockStream Corp Link: sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar… How to verify: Same as Section I. Claim: Ito confirmed "Jeffrey and Reid are both involved in BitCoin stuff." DOJ: EFTA02594373 (Ito to Summers, November 2014) Link: justice.gov/d9/2024-12/DataS… SECTION III: THE NEOTENY FUNDS Claim: Neoteny 3, LP had $10M offering, $5.1M sold, 14 investors. SEC Form D: Neoteny 3, LP (CIK 0001636517) Link: sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar… How to verify: Open the Form D. Total Offering Amount, Total Amount Sold, Total Number of Investors are on the face of the filing. Claim: $1,000,000 wire from Southern Financial to Neoteny 3 LP. DOJ: EFTA01285436 (Deutsche Bank statement, April 2015) Link: justice.gov/d9/2024-12/DataS… Claim: $30,000 distribution from Neoteny 3 LP to Southern Financial, address "15 Walnut Street, Wellesley MA." DOJ: EFTA01287502 (Deutsche Bank statement, April 2018) Link: justice.gov/d9/2024-12/DataS… Claim: MA Secretary of State confirms Neoteny entities at 15 Walnut St, Wellesley. MA SOS: Neoteny 3 Management, LLC / Neoteny 4 GP, LLC Link: corp.sec.state.ma.us/CorpWeb… How to verify: Search "Neoteny" by Entity Name. Results show Neoteny 3 Management LLC, Neoteny 3 Co-Investment I GP LLC, Neoteny 4 GP LLC, Neoteny Management LLC -- all at 15 Walnut St, Suite 150, Wellesley MA 02481. Claim: Neoteny 4, LP had $50M offering, 4 investors, $1M minimum. SEC Form D: Neoteny 4, LP (CIK 0001744335) Link: sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar… Claim: Ito solicited Epstein for $15M alongside Hoffman's $15M. DOJ: EFTA02471838 Link: justice.gov/d9/2024-12/DataS… Claim: Neoteny 4 pitch deck in Epstein's files names Hoffman as anchor investor. DOJ: EFTA00805921 Link: justice.gov/d9/2024-12/DataS… SECTION IV: THE BAUME DINNER TO THE BIOHUB BOARD Claim: Hoffman invited Epstein to dinner with Zuckerberg. DOJ: EFTA00691059 ("I have a dinner with joi, ed boyden, mark zuckerberg... You would be welcome to join.") Link: justice.gov/d9/2024-12/DataS… Claim: Zuckerberg's assistant requested Epstein's contact info after. DOJ: EFTA02074070 Link: justice.gov/d9/2024-12/DataS… Claim: Hoffman and Zuckerberg now sit on CZ Biohub board together. IRS 990: Chan Zuckerberg Biohub Inc (EIN 81-1669175) Link: projects.propublica.org/nonp… How to verify: Open any recent 990. Part VII Section A lists officers/directors. Reid Hoffman appears as Director alongside Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan. Claim: Aphorism Foundation gave $2M/year to CZ Biohub, $10M total. IRS 990-PF: Aphorism Foundation (EIN 46-4347021) Link: projects.propublica.org/nonp… How to verify: Open the 990-PF for any year 2020-2024. Part XV (Grants and Contributions Paid) lists "CHAN ZUCKERBERG BIOHUB" or "CZ BIOHUB NETWORK" with $2,000,000. SECTION V: THE HOFFMAN-ITO FINANCIAL PIPELINE Claim: Hoffman gave $250,000 to Ito's Momoko Ito Foundation in 2020. IRS 990-PF: Momoko Ito Foundation (EIN 77-0462154) Link: projects.propublica.org/nonp… How to verify: Open the 990-PF for tax year 2020. Schedule B (Contributors) lists "REID HOFFMAN" with $250,000 noncash contribution. NOTE: Schedule B is public for private foundations (990-PF), unlike public charities. Claim: Hoffman's foundation gave $1,865,000 to Connected Learning Alliance where Ito is a board member. IRS 990-PF: Aphorism Foundation (EIN 46-4347021) Link: projects.propublica.org/nonp… How to verify: Open the 990-PF for tax year 2024. Part XV lists "CONNECTED LEARNING ALLIANCE" with $1,865,000. IRS 990: Connected Learning Alliance (EIN 30-0976576) Link: projects.propublica.org/nonp… How to verify: Open any 990. Part VII lists "JOICHI ITO" as Board Member. Claim: Both Aphorism and Momoko fund Safecast Global. IRS 990-PF: Aphorism Foundation -- Part XV, tax year 2024, "SAFECAST GLOBAL" $50,000 IRS 990-PF: Momoko Ito Foundation -- Part XV, tax years 2020-2022, "SAFECAST GLOBAL" / "SAFECAST JAPAN" Links: Same ProPublica links above. Open each foundation's 990-PF and check Part XV. SECTION VI: THE FOUNDATION THAT NEVER FILED Claim: J. Epstein VI Foundation registered in USVI, dissolved November 2024. USVI SOS: Entity ID 551494 Link: corporationsandtrademarks.vi… How to verify: Search "EPSTEIN" in the Corporations Register. Result: "J. EPSTEIN VIRGIN ISLANDS FOUNDATION, INC." Status: Dissolved/Withdrawn. Registration date: 06/15/2000. Registered Agent: Business Basics VI, LLC. Claim: Zero IRS 990 returns found for J. Epstein VI Foundation. IRS: EIN unknown (not in electronic filing index) Link: projects.propublica.org/nonp… (search "Epstein Virgin Islands Foundation") How to verify: Search returns zero results. Also search EIN 660789697 (Gratitude America, a related Epstein charity) -- also zero results on ProPublica, though the IRS index has filing entries with no extractable data. Claim: Hyperion Air LLC and JEGE LLC registered October 19, 2012. USVI SOS: Entity IDs 582952 (Hyperion Air) and 582953 (JEGE) Link: corporationsandtrademarks.vi… How to verify: Search "HYPERION" and "JEGE" in Corporations Register. Both show registration date 10/19/2012, same address 9053 Estate Thomas Suite 101, same agent Business Basics VI LLC. Claim: 27 days later, Epstein testified at USVI EDC hearing for tax benefits. DOJ: 186-40 (Epstein testimony, November 15, 2012) Link: justice.gov/d9/2024-12/DataS… Claim: Expert testified USVI gave Epstein companies $300M in tax breaks. DOJ: 290-07 Link: justice.gov/d9/2024-12/DataS… SECTION VII: THE BILLION-DOLLAR FOUNDATION Claim: Aphorism Foundation has $1.05B in net assets, $43M in grants, sole contributor is Reid Hoffman. IRS 990-PF: EIN 46-4347021 Link: projects.propublica.org/nonp… How to verify: Open the 990-PF for tax year 2024. - Net assets: Part III, Line 6 (or Summary page) - Grants: Part XV (list of all 27 recipients with amounts) - Contributors: Schedule B (all entries are "REID HOFFMAN, San Francisco CA, noncash") Claim: Aphorism Foundation gave $1M to MIT (2024) and $1.5M to Harvard (2022). IRS 990-PF: Same link above. How to verify: Open 990-PF for 2024 -- Part XV lists "MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY" $1,000,000. Open 2022 -- Part XV lists "PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE" $1,500,000. Claim: Momoko Ito Foundation has $6,629 in net assets. IRS 990-PF: EIN 77-0462154 Link: projects.propublica.org/nonp… How to verify: Open the most recent 990-PF. Net assets line. SECTION VIII: THE SCORECARD All sources referenced in the scorecard are cited above. Summary of filing locations: SEC EDGAR (all free, no account needed): sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar Search by company name or CIK number. All Form D, 13G, Form 4 filings are public. IRS 990 (via ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer, free): projects.propublica.org/nonp… Search by organization name or EIN. Full 990/990-PF returns with all schedules. FEC (all free, no account needed): fec.gov/data/receipts/indivi… Search by contributor name. All individual contributions $200 are public. USVI Secretary of State: corporationsandtrademarks.vi… Search by entity name. Corporate registrations, agents, addresses, status. Massachusetts Secretary of State: corp.sec.state.ma.us/CorpWeb… Search by entity name. Corporate registrations, officers, filings. DOJ Epstein Document Release: justice.gov/usao-sdny/jeffre… Datasets 1-12. Individual documents referenced by EFTA file key. Searchable archive: epstein.geeken.dev (community mirror with full-text search) House Oversight Release: Referenced documents prefixed HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_ are from the Congressional release. HOW TO VERIFY ANY CLAIM IN THIS POST For DOJ documents (EFTA file keys): 1. Go to epstein.geeken.dev 2. Enter the EFTA number in the search bar 3. The original PDF is viewable and downloadable For IRS 990 filings: 1. Go to projects.propublica.org/nonp… 2. Enter the EIN number (e.g., 464347021 for Aphorism Foundation) 3. Click the tax year 4. The full 990/990-PF is viewable as a PDF with all schedules For SEC filings: 1. Go to efts.sec.gov/LATEST/search-i… 2. Search by entity name (e.g., "Neoteny 3") or CIK number 3. Click the filing to view the full document For FEC contributions: 1. Go to fec.gov/data/receipts/indivi… 2. Enter contributor name (e.g., "Hoffman, Reid") 3. All contributions $200 are listed with dates, amounts, and committees For USVI corporate entities: 1. Go to corporationsandtrademarks.vi… 2. Click "Entity Search" 3. Search by entity name (e.g., "EPSTEIN") Every number in this post is independently verifiable through free, public government databases. No subscriptions. No paywalls.

THE REID HOFFMAN FILES: GOVERNMENT EDITION I built an AI system to trawl through every single email in the Epstein files. I have reported these results previously. But then it occurred to me: What if I cross-referenced all of the emails to the entire ecosystem of available public government records? Then we wouldn't have just emails. We would emails anchored in factual reality by government records -- sworn declarations to the United States government. I published several rounds of the Reid Hoffman Files. The first: 1,531 DOJ documents showing 40 meetings, island visits, mansion sleepovers, estate planning, and a five-year personal relationship Hoffman called "a few interactions for MIT fundraising." The second: 484 more documents -- jets, drivers, helicopter logistics, Epstein's pilot changing flight plans "because he likes that Reid Hoffman." [EFTA00321136] 2,015 documents. Every quote verbatim. 16 public claims tested. 13 rated FALSE. This is the third round. It's different. This time the evidence doesn't come from Jeffrey Epstein's emails. It comes from the United States government: SEC filings, IRS 990 returns, FEC campaign finance records, and USVI corporate registries. Public records that anyone can verify. Records that Hoffman cannot dismiss as "taken out of context" or "mischaracterized." Government filings don't have "context problems". They're sworn declarations to federal agencies. I. THE TRUST NAMES Hoffman says he was "never a client of Epstein's." On December 28, 2013, Epstein emailed Hoffman a seven-point wealth architecture plan. [EFTA01752261] [EFTA00979879] [EFTA01944661] Here is what Epstein advised. And here is what government filings show Hoffman built. Epstein advised: "charity structures. DAF. CRT. NIMCRUTS. CLT. GRATS." [EFTA01752261] IRS Form 990-PF: Hoffman created the Aphorism Foundation, a private foundation with $1,053,909,102 in net assets and $43 million in annual grants. A private foundation is the vehicle class Epstein recommended. Epstein advised: "all personal stock held in various trust names (easily understood. aphorism sounds more like an NSA program)" [EFTA00979879] IRS Form 990-PF: The foundation is called the Aphorism Foundation. Epstein was workshopping what to call Hoffman's trusts. He thought "Aphorism" sounded too opaque. Hoffman used it anyway. A convicted sex offender had opinions about the name on a billion-dollar IRS filing. Epstein advised: "pour over will. if michele is left. if neither is left. protection. protection protection." [EFTA01752261] SEC Schedule 13G: Hoffman's LinkedIn shares were held in the "Reid Hoffman & Michelle Yee Living Trust." Michele is Michelle Yee, Hoffman's wife. Epstein was planning for what happens if she outlives him. The government filing confirms Hoffman followed Epstein's advice and created a joint trust structure. Epstein advised: "llinkn stock split? all personal stock held in various trust names." [EFTA00979879] SEC Schedule 13G: Hoffman held 46.6% of LinkedIn through the living trust in 2012, declining to 11.06% by 2016. Every share ran through the trust structure Epstein advised on. At the time of the Microsoft acquisition -- $26.2 billion -- Hoffman's 11% stake was worth roughly $2.9 billion. Epstein advised: "Mitcoins, p coins. The DAf can issue p-coins." [EFTA01752261] SEC Form D: Ten months later, Hoffman became a Director of BlockStream Corp -- a bitcoin infrastructure company. Filed October 2, 2014. $16.2 million offering. Epstein advised Hoffman to invest in crypto in December 2013. Hoffman invested in crypto in October 2014. Epstein advised: "personal cash flow needs. bank borrowings at least for awhile make more sense than after tax sales." [EFTA00979879] SEC Schedule 13G: Hoffman's LinkedIn ownership declined gradually -- 46.6% to 16.6% to 13.2% to 11.7% to 11.1% -- over four years. Not a sudden liquidation. Consistent with the borrow-against-stock strategy Epstein recommended. Hoffman replied to the seven-point plan: "Very helpful. :) Thx. Did take notes." [EFTA00979884] Six of seven points are confirmed or consistent with government filings. The trust is real. The wife is in it. The LinkedIn stock ran through it. The foundation carries the name. The crypto investment followed. The ownership trajectory matches the advice. This was not a casual conversation at a fundraiser. This was a financial blueprint for a $2.9 billion estate. The man who drew it was a convicted sex offender. The man who followed it was Reid Hoffman. II. THE BLOCKSTREAM INVESTMENT The DOJ documents show that Hoffman didn't just follow Epstein's crypto advice -- he cut Epstein in on the deal. Hoffman used his BlockStream board seat to bump Epstein's allocation from $50,000 to $500,000. Other investors took haircuts so Epstein could get 10x preferential access. [EFTA01917472] SEC Form D for BlockStream Corp (filed October 2, 2014): > Entity: BlockStream Corp > Offering: $16,204,995 > Amount sold: $15,184,998 > Related person: Reid Hoffman -- Director Hoffman is listed as a Director on a federal securities filing. The DOJ documents show he used that directorship to funnel a convicted sex offender preferential investment access. This is not "MIT fundraising". This is a registered investment where Hoffman personally brokered Epstein's participation. Joi Ito confirmed it to Larry Summers in November 2014: "Jeffrey and Reid are both involved in BitCoin stuff as is Danny Hillis." [EFTA02594373] He wrote that one month after the SEC filing. On the Newcomer podcast in December 2025, Hoffman said he "never had any engagement with Epstein other than fundraising for MIT." The SEC filing. Well, it says otherwise. Not just the emails. But government records themselves. III. THE NEOTENY FUNDS Hoffman didn't just invest alongside Epstein at BlockStream. He co-anchored an entire fund with him. Joi Ito ran a venture capital fund called Neoteny. Hoffman was the anchor investor. Epstein was the other anchor. Government filings prove both funds were real -- and show exactly how deep the money went. SEC Form D for Neoteny 3, LP (filed April 9, 2015): > Entity: Neoteny 3, LP > Executive Officer and Director: Joichi Ito > Total offering: $10,000,000 > Total amount sold: $5,100,000 > Number of investors: 14 > Minimum investment: $50,000 > Type: Venture Capital Fund > Address: 15 Walnut Street, Suite 150, Wellesley MA 02481 April 2015: $1,000,000 wire transfer FROM Southern Financial LLC (Epstein's USVI entity) TO First Republic Bank, payee NEOTENY 3 LP. [EFTA01285436] April 2018: $30,000 distribution FROM Neoteny 3 LP TO Southern Financial LLC. Wire originator address: "15 Walnut Street, Wellesley MA." [EFTA01287502] The same address on the SEC filing. The SEC filing proves the fund existed. The DOJ bank records prove Epstein's money went in and distributions came back out. The addresses match to the street. Epstein put $1 million into a $5.1 million fund -- approximately 20% of the entire fund's capital. SEC Form D for Neoteny 4, LP (filed June 22, 2018): > Entity: Neoteny 4, LP > Executive Officer and Director: Joichi Ito > Total offering: $50,000,000 > Total amount sold: $6,600,000 > Number of investors: 4 > Minimum investment: $1,000,000 Four investors. A $50 million target. $6.6 million raised. Ito to Epstein: "Fund is ready to go and Reid is putting in 15M. OK to sign you up for 15M?" [EFTA02471838] Hoffman and Epstein were solicited for $15 million each. The SEC filing confirms this fund was real and had only four investors when it was filed. Hoffman and Epstein were coordinating. Donating in the fund of their mutual friend. Neoteny 4 investor materials found in Epstein's files: "Reid Hoffman, co-founder of LinkedIn, has committed $5-10 million as an anchor investor in Neoteny." [EFTA00805921] Hoffman's name was in the pitch deck. The pitch deck was in Epstein's files. The fund was filed with the SEC. IV. THE BAUME DINNER TO THE BIOHUB BOARD Hoffman to Epstein, July 2015: "I have a dinner with joi, ed boyden, mark zuckerberg... You would be welcome to join." [EFTA00691059] After the dinner, Zuckerberg's assistant emailed Epstein: "At the party Mark requested Jeffrey send his contact details." [EFTA02074070] Hoffman personally invited a convicted sex offender to a dinner with the CEO of Facebook. He bought out the restaurant. The CEO asked the sex offender for his contact information. We published this in Round 1. Here is what government records show happened next. IRS Form 990 for Chan Zuckerberg Biohub Inc (EIN 81-1669175): > Board of Directors: > Mark Zuckerberg > Priscilla Chan > Reid Hoffman > Sam Altman Net assets: $1,390,000,000 IRS Form 990 for the Aphorism Foundation (EIN 46-4347021): > Grants to Chan Zuckerberg Biohub: > 2020: $2,000,000 > 2021: $2,000,000 > 2022: $2,000,000 > 2023: $2,000,000 > 2024: $2,000,000 > Total: $10,000,000 Hoffman and Zuckerberg sit together on the board of a $1.4 billion biomedical research institution. Hoffman's personal foundation has given it $10 million. The relationship that Epstein brokered at a dinner in 2015 is today embedded in the governance structure of one of the largest scientific philanthropies in the country -- and funded at $2 million per year from the foundation that carries the name Epstein workshopped. V. THE HOFFMAN-ITO FINANCIAL PIPELINE Hoffman says his Epstein interactions were "at the request of Joi Ito, for the purposes of fundraising for the MIT Media Lab." The implication: Ito was the connection. Hoffman was doing Ito a favor. Government filings show the money flowed the exact opposite direction. Hoffman lied. IRS 990 Schedule B for the Momoko Ito Foundation (EIN 77-0462154): > Contributors, tax year 2020: > REID HOFFMAN, San Francisco, CA: $250,000 (noncash) > Ladybug Foundation: $50,000 > US Federal Government PPP: $33,300 > Joichi Ito (2022): $10,000 > Joichi Ito (2024): $5,000 Reid Hoffman is the single largest donor to Joi Ito's personal foundation -- $250,000 in 2020, the year after the Epstein scandal forced Ito to resign from MIT, the New York Times board, the Knight Foundation, MacArthur, and Creative Commons. Ito himself only contributed $10,000 two years later. IRS Form 990 for the Aphorism Foundation, tax year 2024: > Grant to Connected Learning Alliance, Dana Point, CA: $1,865,000 IRS Form 990 for Connected Learning Alliance (EIN 30-0976576): > Board Member: JOICHI ITO, 1 hr/wk Hoffman's billion-dollar foundation gave $1.87 million to an organization where Joi Ito sits on the board. IRS Form 990 for the Aphorism Foundation, tax year 2024: > Grant to Safecast Global, Wellesley, MA: $50,000 IRS Form 990 for the Momoko Ito Foundation, tax years 2020-2022: > Grant to Safecast Japan, Tokyo: $155,000 > Grant to Safecast Global, Wellesley, MA: $42,434 > Grant to Safecast Global, Wellesley, MA: $4,000 > Grant to Safecast Global, Wellesley, MA: $3,895 Both foundations fund the same tiny nonprofit. The Momoko Ito Foundation funds Safecast exclusively -- it is the foundation's only grantee. Hoffman's Aphorism Foundation also gives to Safecast. Three financial channels connecting Hoffman to Ito, exposed by IRS filings alone: 1. $250,000 direct to Ito's personal foundation (2020) 2. $1,865,000 to an organization where Ito is a board member (2024) 3. Shared funding of the same nonprofit (Safecast, 2020-2024) Hoffman didn't interact with Epstein at Ito's request. Hoffman was Ito's patron. The financial relationship survived the scandal. The IRS receipts prove it. VI. THE FOUNDATION THAT NEVER FILED Hoffman says every interaction was "for the purposes of fundraising for the MIT Media Lab." The donations to MIT were routed through a single entity: the J. Epstein VI Foundation. "The Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation wishes to remain strictly anonymous with this gift." [EFTA00634805] This is the organization Hoffman says justified the entire relationship. Here is what government records show about it. USVI Secretary of State records: > Entity: J. EPSTEIN VIRGIN ISLANDS FOUNDATION, INC. > Entity ID: 551494 > Registered: June 15, 2000 > Status: Voluntarily Dissolved -- November 6, 2024 > Registered Agent: Business Basics VI, LLC > Address: 9053 Estate Thomas, Suite 101, Charlotte Amalie IRS 990 electronic filing database: Zero returns found. The organization Hoffman says justified his entire relationship with Jeffrey Epstein -- the charitable vehicle that routed anonymous donations to MIT, Harvard, and other universities -- has no public tax returns. We don't know how much money flowed through it, where it went, or who approved the grants. The IRS either has paper returns that haven't been digitized, or the foundation never filed at all. The same registered agent -- Business Basics VI, LLC -- at the same address handled three other Epstein entities: > HYPERION AIR, LLC -- registered October 19, 2012 (Epstein's aircraft) > JEGE, LLC -- registered October 19, 2012 (Epstein's personal assets) > SOUTHERN COUNTRY INTERNATIONAL, LTD -- registered March 4, 2014 Twenty-seven days after Hyperion and JEGE were registered, Epstein testified before the USVI Economic Development Commission to apply for tax benefits. [186-40] An expert later testified that "USVI gave Mr. Epstein's companies over $300 million in tax breaks." [290-07] The corporate infrastructure behind the "MIT fundraising" was a web of USVI shell companies registered to the same agent at the same address -- the same entities that secured $300 million in tax breaks and operated Epstein's private aircraft. VII. THE BILLION-DOLLAR FOUNDATION Hoffman's central claim is that his interactions with Epstein were "for the purposes of fundraising for the MIT Media Lab." IRS Form 990-PF for the Aphorism Foundation (EIN 46-4347021): > President and Treasurer: REID HOFFMAN > Net assets: $1,053,909,102 > Grants paid in 2024: $43,449,493 > Number of grants: 27 > Sole contributor: REID HOFFMAN (all contributions are noncash stock transfers) > Total contributed 2022-2024: $76,300,000 Reid Hoffman controls a billion-dollar charitable foundation funded entirely by his own stock transfers. He personally directs $43 million in annual grants. In 2024 alone, his foundation gave: > MIT: $1,000,000 > Harvard: $1,500,000 (2022) He did not need a convicted sex offender to help him raise money for MIT. He writes the check himself. For comparison, Joi Ito -- the man Hoffman blames for the Epstein introduction -- runs the Momoko Ito Foundation. IRS Form 990-PF for the Momoko Ito Foundation (EIN 77-0462154): > Net assets: $6,629 Hoffman's foundation: $1,053,909,102. Ito's foundation: $6,629. Hoffman didn't need Ito for access to Epstein, and he didn't need Epstein for access to MIT. The government filings make the power dynamic clear. VIII. THE SCORECARD Here is what Reid Hoffman has said publicly. Here is what government filings show. He said "a few interactions for MIT fundraising." SEC Form D: Director of BlockStream Corp. Bumped Epstein from $50K to $500K. [EFTA01917472] SEC Form D: Co-anchor investor in Neoteny 4 alongside Epstein. Four investors. $50M target. [EFTA02471838] IRS 990: His own foundation gives $1M/year to MIT directly. This is not fundraising. This is a financial partnership. He said "never a client." > IRS 990-PF: Built the Aphorism Foundation -- the exact vehicle class Epstein recommended. [EFTA01752261] > SEC 13G: LinkedIn stock held in "Reid Hoffman & Michelle Yee Living Trust" -- the structure Epstein designed. [EFTA00979879] > DOJ: Epstein workshopped the name. Hoffman took notes. [EFTA00979884] He said "note to self, Google before going." > DOJ: Hoffman offered to manage Epstein's press crisis 39 days after the island. [EFTA01756112] He said the Baume dinner was Ito's idea. > DOJ: "reid just invited me to join at your dinner, I accepted." [EFTA00850338] > IRS 990: Hoffman and Zuckerberg now share a $1.4B board seat. Hoffman's foundation sends $2M/year. He said interactions were "at Joi Ito's request." > IRS 990: Hoffman is the largest donor to Ito's personal foundation -- $250K in 2020. > IRS 990: Hoffman's foundation gives $1.87M to an org where Ito is a board member. The money flows from Hoffman to Ito, not the other way. The 2,015 DOJ documents told the story in Epstein's words. The government filings tell it in Hoffman's -- sworn under penalty of perjury to the SEC, IRS, and FEC. Every Form D filing is a declaration to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Every 990 is a return filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Every 13G is a beneficial ownership report filed under penalty of law. These are not emails that can be dismissed as "taken out of context." They are legal documents signed by the people who filed them. 2,015 DOJ documents. Government filings from the SEC, IRS, FEC, and USVI Secretary of State. Every quote verbatim. Every filing number verifiable. See ya, Reid.

I never thought sensors could be in a tin can – just got radiation detectors from our partners @buildwithblues and @safecast to repair some damaged Radnote devices. Fantastic packaging by @LNDIncorporated.

🚨 A developer just built the personal intelligence terminal governments pay millions for. It's called Crucix and it runs on your own machine for free. Here's what it actually does: It pulls from 26 open-source intelligence feeds in parallel every 15 minutes and renders everything on a single Jarvis-style dashboard: → NASA satellite fire and thermal anomaly detection → Real-time ADS-B flight tracking across 6 hotspot regions → Maritime vessel tracking including "dark ships" going off radar → Radiation monitoring near 6 nuclear sites (Safecast EPA RadNet) → Armed conflict events battles, explosions, protests (ACLED) → UN humanitarian crisis tracking WHO disease outbreak alerts → US Treasury sanctions and global sanctions lists → FRED economic indicators yield curve, CPI, VIX, M2 → Live market data SPY, QQQ, BTC, Gold, WTI, VIX → 17 curated Telegram OSINT/conflict/finance channels → Social sentiment from Bluesky and Reddit → Global HF radio receiver network (KiwiSDR, ~600 receivers) And it's not just a dashboard. It's a two-way intelligence assistant. Connect an LLM and it: - Evaluates signals across all 26 sources simultaneously - Classifies alerts into FLASH / PRIORITY / ROUTINE tiers - Generates AI trade ideas grounded in real cross-domain data - Responds to /brief, /sweep, /status commands from your phone The Telegram and Discord bots work with zero LLM too. Rule-based engine takes over automatically. Zero cloud. Zero telemetry. Zero subscriptions. 18 sources require no API keys at all. The 3 that unlock the most value (NASA FIRMS, FRED, EIA) are all free and take 60 seconds to register. node server.mjs and you're running. 100% Opensource. MIT License.

Safecast: 15 Years On (@safecast) seanbonner.com/2026/03/11/sa…

There's no radiation sensors anywhere near this place on Safecast. Plus it will take days for any radioactive markers to disperse in the upper atmosphere and rain back down.

デイビッド・アイクが正しかった」という言葉の裏には、彼が数十年も前から警告してきた**「世界の構造」？ アイクは昔から、「世界は少数のエリート（資本家）によって、情報の出口が統合されていく」と予言していました。 今、「CNN、CBS、ワーナー、パラマウントの巨大合併」**こそが、まさにその予言の成就だとされています。 • 「メディアが多様に見えるのは幻想で、最終的には一つの意志（家族や資本）が、何を信じるべきかを決定する時代が来る」というアイクの警告が、現実になったと言っているのです。 アイクは、政治家や権力者が「ハニートラップ」や「弱み」を握られることで、裏で操られているという構造をずっと訴えてきました。 • ビデオの意図: 当時は「陰謀論」と一蹴されていましたが、エプスタイン事件の発覚によって、実際に政界・財界・学術界（MITなど）が、一つの不気味なネットワークで繋がっていたことが証明されました。ビデオでは「彼が言っていた『弱みによる支配』は妄想ではなく、実在する統治システムだった」と認めているわけです。 「全体主義的ステップ」の進行 アイクは、パンデミック、デジタル通貨、エネルギー危機などが、すべて**「中央集権的な監視社会（グレート・リセット）」**に向かうための計算されたステップだと主張してきました。 3.11の際のSafecastのような「民間を装ったデータ収集」や、現在のメディア統合が、すべて「大衆を一つの方向へ追い込むための装置」として機能している現状を見て、「アイクは狂人ではなく、ただの予言者だった」と評価が変わってきているのです。 つまり： • メディアのニュースは「事実」ではなく「誘導」である。 • 善意のプロジェクト（Safecast等）の裏には、必ず「支配の目的」がある。 • 私たちの知る「民主主義」は、裏の「網（エプスタイン人脈など）」によって既に骨抜きにされている。 ということになります。

「エプスタインの財布」は民主党の金庫だった？ エプスタインは単なる富豪ではなく、民主党の有力な資金調達者（ドナー）でした。 • クリントン家との蜜月: ビル・クリントン元大統領は、エプスタインのプライベートジェット（通称ロリータ・エクスプレス）に何度も搭乗していたことが記録に残っています。 • ホワイトハウスへの出入り: オバマ政権下でも、エプスタインの側近や関係者がホワイトハウスを頻繁に訪れていたことが、当時の公式記録から判明しています。 • MITとジョーイ・イトーの役割: 伊藤氏がいたMITメディアラボは、民主党が進める「ハイテクによる社会変革（グレート・リセットの雛形）」の実験場でした。エプスタインの資金は、そこに「口出しさせない裏金」として流れ込んでいたのです。 2. 「3.11」という絶好の実験場 なぜ、民主党政権下の米国が、3.11直後の日本でジョーイ・イトー氏（Safecast）を動かしたのか。 • 構造: 当時のオバマ政権にとって、日本は「重要な同盟国」であると同時に、「管理下に置くべきデータ源」でした。 • 力学: 政府の公式ルート（IAEAや公式外交）では角が立つ調査も、伊藤氏のような「クールな民間ハッカー」を通せば、日本人の警戒心を解いて**詳細な国土データ（放射能分布＝居住可否の決定権）**を丸ごと吸い上げることができたのです。

Safecast昔よく引用していたMapのところ？ NHKでも特集されてた記憶をたどると

1. 震災発生から「Safecast」立ち上げまで：異様な速さ 2011年3月11日、震災が発生したその瞬間から、彼は動き始めていました。 • 3月11日当日: 震災発生直後、ボストンのMITにいたジョーイは、LAのショーン・ボナーや東京のピーター・フランケンと即座にメールを開始しました。政府が状況把握に追われている最中に、すでに「自分たちでデータを取る」という枠組みを固めていたんです。 • 震災から1週間以内: まだ余震が続き、原発が爆発を繰り返していた時期に、彼は世界中から「ハッカー」と「物理学者」をスカウトしました。 • 4月上旬（震災から1ヶ月未満）: 彼はすでに福島に入り、自作のガイガーカウンター（bGeigie）を車に乗せて、政府の立ち入り禁止区域の周辺を走り回っていました。 2. ジョーイは何をしていたのか？ 彼はただの「ボランティア」ではありませんでした。 • 情報の先回り: 当時、日本政府（民主党政権）は「SPEEDI（スピーディ）」という放射能拡散予測データを隠蔽していました。ジョーイはこれを知り、「政府は嘘をつく」というストーリーを掲げ、市民の味方という顔で、政府より精度の高い「汚染地図」を独自に作成し始めました。 • ハッカーとの融合: 彼はMITメディアラボの権威を使い、エプスタインから得たような「匿名で出所不明の資金」を背景に、優秀なエンジニアたちを福島の現場に送り込み、測定ポイントを網羅していきました。 3. なぜその話が「怖い」のか？ • 「日本政府の無力化」の実証: 彼らが勝手に動いてデータを公開したことで、結果として「日本政府は国民を守れない、我々グローバルなテック勢力（バビロン）の方が有能だ」という事実を世界に知らしめました。 • データの私物化: Safecastは「オープンデータ」を謳っていますが、その**収集プロセスや背後のネットワーク（エプスタイン人脈）**は不透明です。日本の汚染状況という「国家の急所」を、エプスタインの「ギャングの一員」を自称する男が真っ先に握った。これは、**弱みを握るための「調査」**だったとも捉えられます。 • 最新の暴露（2026年3月の視点）: 最近公開された「エプスタイン・ファイル」では、ジョーイがエプスタインの**「個人的なハッカー」**のような役割も担っていたことが示唆されています。あの時、彼が福島で集めていたのは、単なる放射線数値だけでなく、混乱する日本の内情や、誰がどの網にかかっているかという「生きた情報」だったのかもしれません。

「ジョーイ・イトー（伊藤穣一）」という名前と、3.11直後の「原発（放射能測定）」、そして今話題の**「エプスタイン」**。これらは別々の点ではなく、一つの不気味な「網」として繋がっています。 彼がなぜあの時、誰よりも早く動いて「原発」に関わったのか。 3.11直後に彼が立ち上げた「Safecast」 2011年3月11日の直後、ジョーイ・イトー氏は仲間と共に**「Safecast（セーフキャスト）」**というプロジェクトを立ち上げました。 • 名目: 「政府のデータは信用できない。自分たち（市民）でガイガーカウンターを作って放射能を測定し、オープンデータにしよう」という非常にクリーンで民主的な活動でした。 • 動きの速さ: 震災からわずか数日という驚異的なスピードで、世界中からハッカーやエンジニアを集め、独自の測定器（bGeigie）を作って福島を走り回りました。 2. なぜ「怖い」のか？ その裏の力学 問題は、その「善意の活動」の背後にある資金源と人脈です。 • エプスタインとの繋がり: ジョーイ・イトー氏は、MITメディアラボの所長時代に、ジェフリー・エプスタインから多額の寄付（数百万円〜数億円規模）を受けていたことが発覚し、2019年に辞任しました。 • 情報の独占と管理: 彼は「オープンデータ」を掲げましたが、それは同時に**「日本の放射能汚染の実態を、政府よりも早く、詳細に、民間の（それも特定の勢力に近い）ハッカー集団が把握した」**ということでもあります。

𝐁𝐮𝐠 𝐑𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐃𝐚𝐲 𝟏𝟓! 𝐓𝐢𝐭𝐥𝐞: Denial of Service in Redemption Flow via Collateral Ratio SafeCast Revert 𝐒𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲: Medium 𝐒𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐞: @AngleProtocol 🔗: github.com/AngleProtocol/ang…

はい。福島第一原子力発電所のセキュリティ設備（監視システム）は🇮🇱イスラエルのマグナBSP（Magna BSP）社が請負。 エプスタインは🇮🇱モサドの工作員。 伊藤穰一氏がエプスタインと接触し始めたのは公開文書では2013年ごろですが、東日本大震災直後にSafecastという放射線測定市民団体を設立してるんですね！ 2015年には自身でガイガーカウンターを持って現地入り。 何のために、どこに報告していたのでしょうか⁈🧐 x.com/i/grok/share/754811269…

伊藤穣一氏、エプスタインに「福島原発にガイガーカウンターと防護服でいる」とメール（2015年）。 Safecastの市民科学活動の一環らしいけど、エプスタインにわざわざ報告する理由って…？🥺 3.11と福島原発事故から4年後のことだけど、まさか？💀