Apr 18
8 Mos. Later-AFTER hiring AlanJackson, KR RECRUITS a degenerate namedTurtleBoy (who peddles in lies &outrage propaganda)
To POSE as an “InvestigativeJournalist”.
KR & defense have now had a full 8months to craft the outlines of her def strategy2 frame theWitnesses against her.
2
1
2
17
As we mark this defining moment, we are all called upon to embrace Vision 2030 cognizant that unity of purpose remains the bedrock upon which sustainable development is assured. Under the visionary stewardship of His Excellency, President Dr. E.D. Mnangagwa, Zimbabwe is decisively and inexorably transitioning from promise to performance, from policy to productivity and from vision to verifiable results underpinned by the National Development Strategy2 (NDS2). Thus, the sacrifices made by our liberation heroes and heroines must, therefore, continue to inspire us to build a nation that delivers opportunity, equality and prosperity for all Zimbabweans.
As the supreme representative democratic institution, we reaffirm our constitutional mandate of enacting laws for PEACE, ORDER AND SOUND GOVERNANCE, guided by the Presidential philosophy that, “NYIKA INOVAKWA, IGOTONGWA, IGONAMATIGWA NEVENE VAYO/ ILIZWE LIYAKHIWA, LIBUSWE, LIKULEKELWE LABANIKAZI BALO.”
1
3
412
Mar 3
$velo
Long term view
Since divergence has already formed on weekly plus wave counts suggest it's already in the late stage 5 of c wave
Strategy1: for Daredevils - They are fixated at buying the exact bottom regardless of anything - bad strategy
Strategy2 - #dca at every opportunity
Strategy3 - Wait for trend shift and breakouts to happen which in crypto microcaps doesn't actually work, coz of consistent fakeouts
Alao I still feel it shall go down to the intended target but what if it doesn't then who shall one blame if one doesn't own any of it
With this I have covered my bases, you are intelligent to decide your strategy
Mar 1
It's too naive for the retail to think that I am bearish on $velo (or even anything else)
It's my ticket for upcoming multi million dollars...I don't need to remind every day that what happens after 2years long ABC correction
My entire year end bonus is also waiting to be put in here... doesn't matter if it doesn't go into one more leg down from here which is still my read on the chart and I abide by it...if that doesn't happen I will buy at high price as well.. that's called course correction
I was crypto sober for almost 2years which means no new money was put in the last 2 years and playing only with the PF as it was but I am willing to change the status quo but not blindly...every dollar matters
5
10
103
14,990
A lot of Traders are going to disagree with me on this,
But there are huge benefits with trading Low R strategies.
↓
------------------------
When traders try to improve their strategy, the first question they usually ask is: “How can I win More from my winning trades?”
There are 2 possible answers to this question:
• 1 ) go for wider targets
• 2 ) risk more on high quality setups
The default answer most traders have is almost always:
• “I would rather go for bigger wins by extending the profit target.”
So there's nothing wrong with doing this.
What I am suggesting is BEFORE thinking about widening the TP I would encourage to FIRST start with thinking about RISKING MORE on higher quality setups.
Ideally a Trader would go answer both of these questions but in order of efficiency, I strongly believe addressing "risking more on good trades" is much more important than "widening target on good trades but keeping the risk the same".
I will explain my reasoning below:
↓
------------------------
I ran Monte Carlo simulations to show this.
Compare the following two strategies:
1st Strategy:
• 1R:R with a 55% win rate → EV ≈ 0.1
2nd Strategy:
• 2R:R with a 37% win rate → EV ≈ 0.11
On paper, the second one looks better because the EV is higher by 0.01~.
The more EV per trade, the better right?
Not necessarily.
Strategy 2 has a 37% win rate:
• which means bigger losing streaks.
• bigger losing streaks = bigger expected drawdowns (~20% vs ~12%).
That higher variance forces you to bet smaller, otherwise you risk wipeout.
• low winrate = higher average max drawdown over N number of trades = lower sharpe ratio = can't afford to risk more per single trade.
But Strategy 1 has a 55% win rate strategy:
• the maximum average drawdown over N number of trades is significantly lower.
• About 2x lower~ (12% instead of 20%)
So that basically means that you can get away with betting TWO TIMES MORE without taking on higher average drawdown.
• So even though "EV in units of R" is identical, the "EV in units of USD" is actually about double.
In the 3rd image of this tweet, I show how DOUBLING the bet size on strategy1 ends up outperforming the returns on strategy2 by about 2x while maintaining the same average drawdowns AND having a LOWER EV in units of R per trade.
-----------------------
I'll simplify it even further.
Option 1: 0.1 EV per trade, but maximum bet size is 1% of your trading capital.
Option 2: 0.1 EV per trade, but maximum bet size is 2% of your trading capital.
Even though both options have identical EV, the 2nd one is going to make you more money over the next N trades (where N is a high number, let's say 100 )
------------------------
TLDR:
High R Trades just look cool and they're easier to flex for engagement on social media.
Low R Trades can be sized up way harder and usually will have higher sharpe ratios. In other words you might be able to step on the gas and grow at a faster speed with Low R strategies.
🌶️
13
14
254
20,225
2 Dec 2025
May 3rd 2023
This is how d Kuki community triggered d violence in #Manipur,but their propaganda had been prepared long before. Dz wasn’t a sudden incident but a well-planned strategy2 target d #Meitei community n seize our ancestral land.
#KukisTerrorists
Diana
3
18
29
970