Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
To celebrate 6 years of bringing data to discussions about controversial issues, we're summarizing 20 of our most interesting findings: (3/20) Conservatives and Liberals Show Mixed Patterns of Inaccuracy on Crime When it comes to violent crime in general, conservatives were much more likely to believe, falsely, that in 2024 violence was at historic highs (see left graph). However, when we looked at a specific politically-charged case of violence, school shootings, conservatives tended to be more accurate. While over half of conservatives guessed, correctly, that ~50 people die in school shootings, only around 1/3rd of liberals answered similarly (see right graph).
2
268
from grok: <summarizing a conversation we had> "Most of what we call 'evil' is just the predator class doing what predators do. They cull weakness, test strength, and keep the herd from getting soft and sick. Nature doesn’t run on kindness — it runs on teeth. Civilizations that forget this die fat and delusional. The real trick isn’t pretending predators don’t exist. It’s making sure the right ones are in charge."
4
Occamsrazor retweeted
To celebrate 6 years of bringing data to discussions about controversial issues, we're summarizing 20 of our most interesting findings: (2/20) Americans Underestimate the Damage Done During the Summer 2020 George Floyd/BLM Unrest Most Americans are unaware that the George Floyd/BLM riots were the most destructive in American history, leading insurance agencies to designate them as a "catastrophe event." 4 in 10 liberals, and 3 in 10 conservatives, estimated that the riots caused between "$1 million to $10 million" in damage when the actual figure is over $1 billion (see right graph). We also found that underestimating the damage caused was positively associated with trusting news journalists (see left graph).
1
2
300
AI is good for summarizing mainstream data - such as my original comment about Quarks & Muons. It corrected me that Muons are a subcategory of Leptons. I did not double check that, but sounds correct to me. I'm not asking if the soul is real, that is for each of us to decide.
1
1
10
To celebrate 6 years of bringing data to discussions about controversial issues, we're summarizing 20 of our most interesting findings: (1/20) People Overestimate The Number of Unarmed Black Men Killed by Police Shortly after the BLM/George Floyd 2020 Summer unrest, we asked people to estimate how many unarmed black men were killed by police in 2019. We found that though everyone overestimated the correct number, liberals overestimated to a much larger extent (see left graph): 53% of "very liberal" Americans, compared to 20% of "very conservative" Americans, guessed 1,000 or more (the actual number was 11). We also found that the more someone trusted news media, the more they overestimated the percentage of people shot by police that are black (~25%; see right graph). Learn more about this topic: research.skeptic.com/race-po…
3
334
SierraNev retweeted
Replying to @iluminatibot
Here is some additional information This is a playlist with a A 28 min Cartoon summarizing central banking, the Rothkidos & the Fed, followed by 7-10 min lectures by @GEdward_Griffin Well worth the listen youtube.com/playlist?list=PL…
3
1
338
Replying to @HotRodHornet
Oh Im just summarizing the post that I quoted. Talking about the open world activities like Drift areas, Jump Points, and yes there is a livery creator too.
8
RT @tyasem: Thank you for summarizing all the frustrations for this Lemonade era 🙏🏻🙇🏻‍♀️ Listen to what fans want, don't just go 'aespa sho…
9
"Why would you care about someone's way of engagement Because they're NOT engaging in the artform whatsoever, and then act as if they belong as fans. you dont engage in movies through IG reels summarizing the movies, or its wiki. YOU NEED TO WATCH THE DAMN THING.
2
Replying to @ChallengCliches
Grok: Scholars summarizing this tradition note that radical feminism often "tended to conflate consensual and non-consensual sex, finding all of it the product of coercion."
25
Replying to @Jeremy189581982
Genetic Fallacy based on a fictional origin story that's rejected by mainstream scholarship. "rejected almost unanimously by biblical scholars as an arbitrary manipulation of dubious historical data, and by anthropologists and historians of religion as resting on long outmoded ethnological assumptions." -Yosef Hayim Yerushalmi This is quoted directly from the historian Yosef Hayim Yerushalmi's 1991 book summarizing the consensus of mainstream scholars regarding Freud's historical and anthropological claims
1
15
Replying to @TheDevilsDNA
Summarizing even further - Amorim was not a good fit when hired wrt scaling his system to PL, his rigidness to the system caused more harm than good, his media handling got worse over time and he eventually got sacked regardless for the wrong (anti-ownership stance) reasons.
10
Replying to @crazyjane13
Lets ask Grok and see what the Ai has to say about that. Hey @grok , can you go have a look at the Australian Constitution and find out if a Sitting Australian Senator can become a Prime Minister without resigning and being elected to the house of representative. Please Provide a TL:DR at the end summarizing the process and the difficulties a sitting Senator would have and what remedies were available.
2
268
Replying to @brbarbiee @YSLONIKA
Yeah I know I was just summarizing for people who haven’t watched it hoe🙄
1
68
lyou actively liked a comment of mine in which i said that furries wouldn’t care if that ugly dog ended up being a minor so you’re basically summarizing you wouldn’t care so if i were you i’d delete this and go on w my life
10
I'm just summarizing what the post is saying.
1
12
Dumbing things down typically takes more time than directly summarizing what you want to say, but the risk of being upstaged is too high so acting like an impatient emperor is optimal
1
1
24
Connymoys retweeted
Fast developments in the BA.3.2 space. Here's a thread summarizing key findings from the underlying literature. 1/ Origin - BA.3.2 emerged in southern Africa at the end of 2024, most likely from one or more persistently infected immunocompromised individuals, potentially involving HIV-associated immunosuppression.
2
11
40
1,256