Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
岸くんがインライの終わり時間、3が付くのがキリがいいって言うところからやっと気がついた! 察し悪くてごめんなさい。 The Numbersの発行日 2026.6.13 2026.3.3 2025.11.13 2025.9.23 #Number_i #TheNumbers
3
56
909
46,747
いる? 紫耀(平野)← ( )いる?ꉂ🤣w𐤔 #Number_i #TheNumbers
⫷ デジタルマガジン 更新 / Digital Magazine Update ⫸ The Numbers #009 ファンクラブサイトにて限定公開中! ▶tobe-community.jp/fc/number_… #Number_i - - - The Numbers #009 Now available exclusively on the fan club website!
10
3,507
お写真かっこよすぎだし、インタビューも話し方まで伝わってきそうで🤭 #TheNumbers #Number_i
⫷ デジタルマガジン 更新 / Digital Magazine Update ⫸ The Numbers #009 ファンクラブサイトにて限定公開中! ▶tobe-community.jp/fc/number_… #Number_i - - - The Numbers #009 Now available exclusively on the fan club website!
8
1,001
The Numbers Business Report asks, where have all the indie films gone? ... the-numbers.com/#20260608-bu… #IndependentFilm #IndieMovies #TheNumbers
6
886
元木 retweeted
⫷ デジタルマガジン 更新 / Digital Magazine Update ⫸ TheNumbers #008 ファンクラブサイトにて限定公開中! ▶tobe-community.jp/fc/number_… #Number_i - - - TheNumbers #008 Now available exclusively on the fan club website!
170
5,634
23,295
487,071
Heavenly Kathrynmichael retweeted
Replying to @yourockmwt
"TheNumbers" lists BR with 879,008,897 $, so Michael already surpassed that.
1
1
75
6,758
Sometimeswe runawafrom love.Often therearetwo reasons forthis.Werun away when we no longerlove someone or when we love themvery muchbut we are afraid. It is amazing that infeelings the same thing happens as inmathematicsThetotaldoes not change aftershifting thenumbers to be added
1
16
84
The Very Unhappy PA retweeted
#Thenumbers £4.9bn spent on the system each year, including: £2.7bn on asylum accommodation £700m on cash support £600m on unaccompanied asylum-seeking children Nearly £1bn on casework, appeals, detention, and removal x.com/RupertLowe10/status/20… Now Breathe

I am a member of the Public Accounts Committee in Parliament and we have just released our findings on Britain’s broken asylum system. It is beyond damning. Some extracts from our report… “…Government departments still do not have a grip on how they will manage asylum as an end-to-end system, or a clear sense of what they are trying to achieve.” “Major policy risks and operational changes have been pursued without a realistic grip on delivery risks, costs or system-wide impacts.” “…no single point of accountability for outcomes or a governance structure for the end-to-end system.” “…absence of a clear strategy, decisions around planning and resource allocation have been reactive and disjointed.” “The Home Office was unable to show… that it has the commercial capabilities needed to manage asylum accommodation effectively.” “…weaknesses in its ability to prevent excess profits accruing for contractors…” “…no evidence that lessons from past mistakes are being used to clearly inform current actions.” “Poor data quality and weak management information continue to prevent effective management…” “…current data sharing limitations make it impossible to directly track individual cases through the entire asylum process.” “The Home Office does not yet have a credible long-term strategy for asylum accommodation…” “… there is little evidence the Home Office fully understands the impact of its approach on local services.” “The government is at considerable risk of repeating past failures.” But don’t worry, the government says it has a plan... It says it has “learned a lot of lessons”. And that it’s going to put 10,000 civil servants into what they call an “Asylum Group”. Funded by us, of course. How about improving data-linking systems? The Ministry of Justice says it simply needs more of our money. And what about ending the use of hotels and transferring to larger, “purpose-driven” sites? “The Home Office’s own analysis suggests that large sites will cost more than hotels, as seen in previously costly attempts such as Wethersfield.” The numbers… £4.9 billion spent on the system each year, including: £2.7 billion on asylum accommodation £700 million on cash support £600 million on unaccompanied asylum-seeking children Nearly £1 billion on casework, appeals, detention, and removal All spent to produce between 50,000 or so refugees each year. And of course, these costs don’t include what is then paid by us, the taxpayer, in Local Authority housing, welfare, childcare assistance, and advice and translation services once once they receive their refugee status and are no longer in the asylum system. Want more? At the time of the NAO report (December 2025), Home Office reported there were roughly 224,000 individuals still waiting in the system, excluding those awaiting an initial asylum decision. Further, since April 2024, MoJ say the number of asylum seekers waiting for an appeal decision alone has trebled, from 27,000 to 70,000, with appeals taking nearly 60 weeks to be heard. Who pays for them while they wait over a year for a decision? Us. And the tens of thousands of failed asylum seekers each year - what happens to them? The Home Office isn’t sure. It says it knows “where some of them are”, but the rest are “elsewhere in the country”, and that it is possible they “remain in the UK without detection”. Don’t fear though, because the Home Office won’t guarantee that it will find them, only that it would “seek to find them”. Whatever the hell that means… And to deal with the backlog of cases and appeals? “Home Office relaxed its recruitment arrangements, resulting in newly recruited staff being ill-suited to making complex decisions on asylum cases, which in turn affected decision quality.” The result? “In a rolling twelve months to May 2025, 42% of sampled decisions had significant or fail errors.” Astounding incompetence. But there’s more good news... The MoJ is recruiting even more over-paid salaried and fee-paid judges, as well as recruiting judges from other chambers to sit in asylum cases. In other words, MoJ’s response is to spend more of our money and remove judges from other work. This is because more asylum seekers “are now representing themselves and that this requires additional support from tribunal staff.” “The system of monitoring failed asylum seekers needs a complete overhaul,” says the report. I have a better idea. My own view? Scrap the entire system altogether, and deport every single illegal migrant living in Britain. And to those of you say that it’s impossible - to any MPs, public servants, or commentators who think I’m cherry-picking information, I implore you to read every word of the PAC report, every word of the NAO report, and to watch every minute of the 2.5 hour PAC meeting from earlier this year… And then tell me that the system is working, and that’s it’s delivering value for money, and that it’s sustainable. It isn’t. And it never will be. It is an intentional, monumental catastrophe designed to cripple the nation economically, socially, and culturally. A Restore Britain government will crush the entire asylum system as its first duty to the British people. Deport them all.
1
23
🎥 Highest-Grossing Superhero Movies Ever Adjusted for Inflation 💰 1. 🛡️ Avengers: Endgame ($3.65B, 2019) 2. 🪐 Avengers: Infinity War ($2.72B, 2018) 3. 🕷️ Spider-Man: No Way Home ($2.37B, 2021) 4. 🇺🇸 The Avengers ($2.20B, 2012) 5. ⚡ Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1.97B, 2015) 6. 🐾 Black Panther ($1.79B, 2018) 7. 🛠️ Iron Man 3 ($1.74B, 2013) 8. 👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Incredibles 2 ($1.65B, 2018) 9. 🛡️ Captain America: Civil War ($1.60B, 2016) 10. 🦇 The Dark Knight Rises ($1.57B, 2012) 11. 🃏 The Dark Knight ($1.56B, 2008) 12. 🦸 Superman ($1.54B, 1978) 13. 🌊 Aquaman ($1.52B, 2018) 14. 🕷️ Spider-Man ($1.52B, 2002) 15. 🕷️ Spider-Man: Far From Home ($1.47B, 2019) 16. ✨ Captain Marvel ($1.47B, 2019) 17. 🕷️ Spider-Man 3 ($1.44B, 2007) 18. ⚔️ Deadpool & Wolverine ($1.42B, 2024) 19. 🃏 Joker ($1.41B, 2019) 20. 🕷️ Spider-Man 2 ($1.39B, 2004) 21. ⚔️ Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice ($1.21B, 2016) 22. 🕷️ Spider-Man: Homecoming ($1.20B, 2017) 23. 🌌 Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 ($1.17B, 2017) 24. ⚡ Thor: Ragnarok ($1.16B, 2017) 25. 🐙 Venom ($1.14B, 2018) 🖇️ Source: Box Office Mojo, TheNumbers, Reuters, Wikipedia
6
24
147
7,266
TheNumbers – Psychological Edge Before every trade:Check exact RR (min 2:1) Size position accurately (0.5% – 1%) Ask: “Am I fully okay losing this amount?” Formula: 4H Frame & Fib Zones → EMA RSI Quality → 1H Sweep → Trade with TheNumbers. Follow@Kingdomvalue101
2
34
FRAME & ZONES FIBO TheNumbers: Simple, high-probability approach in Thepurposetradinglife. Structure Precision Psychology = Sustainable edge. Thread 🧵
2
1
2
97
David Ndii’s Ideas Part 2 — Are They Investable? 🏠📈 ​1/ Cutting Through the Noise ✅️Is the Boma Yangu a viable investment or just political theater. As an analyst, I look at yields. Is there a 14% yield opportunity here? Let’s crunch the numbers. 🧵👇 #BomaYangu #TheNumbers
4
11
48
8,081
Xavier Roster Outlook Richard Pitino's group is looking sneaky good. If this ends up being their final roster, it would be around a top-25 squad in a typical year. Four really massive transfer adds in Dominguez, Westry, Washington, and Nwoko.
9
1,611
👇️これとデジマガ閲覧期限間近ですよ🔊!!!!! おかわりするなり見納めるなり……忘れずに🤗 #Number_i #TheNumbers
⋱ Movie更新  ⋰ FC企画「二番目を当てろ! in to HEROes 〜TOBE 2nd Super Live〜 クイズ!」東京公演 編 ファンクラブサイトにて限定公開中! ▶tobe-community.jp/fc/number_… #TOBE #Number_i #TOBE_toHEROes_2nd
4
157