From
@DrDavidHealy : We have to make a difference in the case of a death like Stephen’s.
Everyone involved in Stephen’s case and later inquest seemed to be decent people. The decent medical people, perhaps on the advice of their lawyers, shucked off responsibility – as medical people, maybe always advised by lawyers, regularly do.
An inquest is one of the few times a doctor can make the medicines we take safer – by telling a coroner that its likely a drug did kill the person. Unless a doctor opens up this possibility, it is impossible for a coroner to do anything. Even with the option opened up, its difficult for a coroner. At best s/he can draw the attention of the powers that be to the case – who will then ignore what has happened.
It was unfortunate that Stephen’s doctor failed to rise to the challenge, because this was an occasion where a family was waiting to try and bring good out of a situation rather than seek retribution and with the resources to do so.
How the system dealt with Stephen is almost certainly how it will deal with you whether you die from drug induced agitation, a heart attack, or stroke – unless the failings of the system are so gross that they cannot be ignored in which case they get passed off as a rotten apple issue and throwing the apple out means the system stays the same.
Most passers-by if forced to read this post would likely figure antidepressant induced suicide is unlikely to happen to them. Most are likely also pretty annoyed at the Vaccine Hesitant who are putting us all at risk.
Doctors who fail to stand up for their patients or the patient’s family at inquests do a great deal to create vaccine hesitancy. They kill the trust that those who have been harmed by treatments originally had – or they would never have taken the treatment in the first place.
This trust is not just in sertraline or a vaccine, its trust in the doctor recommending it and in the institutions that s/he trusts.
Anyone who figures our institutions cannot be trusted:
▪️to be transparent about the data,
▪️and transparent about how fake the medical literature is,
▪️and transparent about how our doctors and others will respond when treatments kill or maim us – after we’ve taken them to benefit ourselves or ordered to take them by our doctors (who get paid more if we do) or to benefit our community in the case of vaccines...
is on pretty solid grounds. These grounds offer a good basis for hesitancy.
This has nothing to do with fear of vaccines and everything to do a horrible awareness that we cannot depend on people we thought we could trust. For your doctor or politicians or Brenda Hale, or NICE, or Medical Associations or Medical Journals or anyone else to blame anyone who is vaccine hesitant for these reasons is contemptible.
This is a problem that is not going to go away until we either have a complete surveillance state or doctors and others regain our trust.
Read in full here 👉🏼
davidhealy.org/from-stephen-…
#StephensVoice #TimeForTruth #TimeForTransparency #TimeForChange