The deprecated RollupProcessorV3 was still unpaused and still held leftover funds. processRollup(bytes,bytes) did not enforce rollupProviders[msg.sender], despite comments saying callers must be an approved provider or use the escape hatch. Execution path: decodeProof() -> Verifier28x32.verify() -> validateAndUpdateMerkleRoots() -> processDepositsAndWithdrawals() -> processBridgeCalls() -> transferFee() In processDepositsAndWithdrawals, when proofId == 2, it directly calls: withdraw(publicValue, publicOwner, assetId) withdraw() then sends ETH/ERC20 directly from the RollupProcessor balance. The attacker submitted valid follow-up rollups to the deprecated processor and encoded withdrawals to their own address. This incident involved legacy Aztec Connect funds that remained in an active rollup processor. It did not affect the current Aztec protocol.

🚨 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: Cape Town City reached club-to-club agreement with Austria side SV Ried for midfielder Jaedin Rhodes - personal terms between the 23yo and Ried agreed. Undisclosed #transferfee. #CTC to #SVRied. 🤝 #iDiskiTimes #TransferNews 🗞️

Years ago, Arsène Wenger warned that rising transfer fees could take football down a dangerous path. Today, £100M valuations are becoming the norm, with every major deal pushing the market even higher. What once seemed impossible is now considered reasonable. The transfer market is no longer driven solely by ability. Inflation, scarcity, and financial power now play a huge role in player valuations. With the way things are going, Wenger's warning looks more accurate with every transfer window. #Transfer #ArsèneWenger #TransferFee #ElliotAnderson

Years ago, Arsène Wenger warned that rising transfer fees could take football down a dangerous path. Today, £100M valuations are becoming the norm, with every major deal pushing the market even higher. What once seemed impossible is now considered reasonable. The transfer market is no longer driven solely by ability. Inflation, scarcity, and financial power now play a huge role in player valuations. With the way things are going, Wenger's warning looks more accurate with every transfer window. #Transfer #ArsèneWenger #TransferFee #ElliotAnderson

Years ago, Arsène Wenger warned that rising transfer fees could take football down a dangerous path. Today, £100M valuations are becoming the norm, with every major deal pushing the market even higher. What once seemed impossible is now considered reasonable. The transfer market is no longer driven solely by ability. Inflation, scarcity, and financial power now play a huge role in player valuations. With the way things are going, Wenger's warning looks more accurate with every transfer window. #Transfer #ArsèneWenger #TransferFee #ElliotAnderson

Helt anden presspiller end Rashford og med langt større udviklingspotentiale. Folk kigger ofte kun på transfersummen, men den samlede pakke handler jo også om transferfee fordelt over kontraktlængde, løn, bonusser og eventuelle sign-on fees. Her ville de koste tæt på det samme.

比特币上号称第一个 Ordinals DAT 的项目，NodeStrategy。它把 MicroStrategy 那套金库叙事搬到了 NFT 上，金库买猴、回购销毁、number go up，听上去很顺。但它现在 0.46x 深度折价，价格趴着不动。问题出在设计本身。喂这台机器的燃料，和把这台机器锁死的牢笼，是同一样东西，那 10% 的交易费。下面一步步拆。 先说 NodeStrategy 是什么。一个比特币 Rune Token，叫 NODESTRAT，总量 10 亿。自称 The Perpetual Monke Machine，比特币 L1 上第一个 Ordinals 数字资产金库。金库的标的是 NodeMonkes，一个蓝筹 Ordinals NFT 系列，注意它跟官方 NodeMonkes 没关系。交易场所是 radFi，也就是现在的 Bound。 再说飞轮怎么转。它画的饼是个四步闭环。每笔买卖收 10% 费，90% 进金库，10% 给 radFi。金库拿这笔费去扫 NodeMonke 的地板。把扫来的猴挂成一个梯子，在 Satflow 上按不同利润目标卖。猴子卖出的 BTC，100% 拿去回购并销毁 NODESTRAT。供应减少，价格上涨，更多人来交易，又生出更多费。号称越转越值钱。剧本就这一个，听着自洽。可它转不动，下面是为什么。 第一点，为什么 NODESTRAT 只能圈在 radFi / Bound 上交易。 先认清命根子。整套飞轮，扫货、卖货、回购销毁，全靠那 10% 费喂。没有这笔费，金库没钱，机器当场停。 那这 10% 由谁收，收在哪一层。换成以太坊或者 Solana，这事很简单，Token 的合约自己就能收。ERC20 可以写 fee-on-transfer，Solana 的 Token-2022 有 TransferFee。每笔转账，Token 自己的代码把税扣掉，你在哪交易都一样，税跟着 Token 走。 但 NODESTRAT 是比特币上的一个 Rune。比特币 L1 没有智能合约。一个 Rune 就是 Runes 协议账本里的一条余额记录，etch 一下记个数，它没有代码，没有 transfer hook，没有任何能自己执行的逻辑。你造不出一个会自动收税的 Rune。转一个 Rune，就是一笔普通比特币交易把余额挪个位置，中间没有任何东西能拦下来抽走 10%。 所以这 10% 长不到币身上，只能长在交易场所身上。是 radFi / Bound 的池子，在你买卖 NODESTRAT 的那一刻，构造交易时把 10% 扣走。税收在平台层，Token 本身一分都扣不动。 推论就出来了。这 10% 只有在 radFi / Bound 上交易才存在。你把 NODESTRAT 当普通 Rune 点对点转给朋友，或者拿到别的 Ordinals 市场去卖，全都没有这 10%，因为 Bound 以外没有任何地方知道这条规则，更没法强制它。 于是项目只剩一条活路，把所有交易死死圈在 radFi / Bound 里。全世界只有这一个地方收得到这笔过路费。流动性一旦流到别处，费收入归零，金库停止扫货，飞轮立刻死。 这也解释了那 10% 里分给 radFi 的那一份。radFi 是收费站，NodeStrategy 负责把车都引到这条路上来。这个币几乎是字面意义上被 Bound 住了，名字起得实诚。它的整套价值机制，像人质一样押在一个平台上。这是写进设计里的脆弱。 第二点，为什么价格涨不起来，根子在哪。 它的剧本是 number go up，那为什么趴着。真正的问题是，这台机器的燃料本身在毒害它自己的需求。 机器先就没油。飞轮烧的是成交量，而成交量基本死了，一天 9K 美元。10% 抽成 900，90% 进金库 810，一天扫不到 0.01 BTC。没量就没费，没费就不扫货，不扫货梯子就没货卖，不卖就没回购，不回购就没销毁，落到价格上什么都没发生。整条链在空转。 更要命的一点。那 10% 不只是燃料，它同时是压在自己价格上的逆风。买进收 10%，卖出再收 10%，一个来回先亏 20%。这个币得先涨过 20%，交易者才回本。你等于请人来买一个进场扣 10%、出场再扣 10% 的东西，投机的速度直接被掐死。一边是回购销毁那点顺风，一边是 20% 来回税这股逆风，吹的是同一个币。它在跟自己打架。 回购那条管子本来就拧得很紧。回购只在一个 NodeMonke 真从梯子上卖出去时才触发，卖猴的钱才拿去回购。可 NFT 市场接盘薄，卖得慢，卖得不确定。它到现在总共才卖出 39 个，梯子上短桶 15 个，中桶长桶都是 0。回购的水龙头基本在滴。已经销毁掉的那 30.77%。 销毁本身不创造需求。减供应能推价，前提是需求还在。没量，进场还被收 10%。你把 30% 的供应烧掉，换来的只是一个更小、却照样没人出价的盘子。价格是边际上的供需，它在猛攻分母，分子那头的需求被税和死成交量锁着。 那个 0.46x 折价，是个自己锁死自己的陷阱。币价只有 NAV 的一半。正常的 DAT 在溢价的时候，可以增发 Token 去买更多资产，越买越增厚，这才是 number go up 真正的杠杆。剩下唯一能推价的杠杆是回购，又被前面那条饿着。溢价的路走不了，回购的路走不动，折价就一直挂在那，没有任何机制把它收回去。 最后，NAV 比市值高一倍，价格为什么还不往 NAV 靠。持有 NODESTRAT 没有任何赎回通道，你不能把币换回它隐含的那 0.46 倍 NodeMonke。你唯一的出口，是在 radFi 上卖给下一个出价的人，还得再交 10%。那个 NAV 是个营销数字，不是地板价，市场当然不认，只按资金流给它定价。 那 10% 费本来要喂飞轮，结果它一手把飞轮最需要的需求和成交量收税收死，一手又只能靠把币锁在一个平台上才收得到，把流动性也限死。再加上 backing 不可赎回、不可变现，NAV 锚不住价格。这台机器的设计，是让燃料源去限制自己的需求。 不评估涨跌，只说机制。 有没有什么好办法，让这个其实质地很好的飞轮继续起飞？

5/ fees per flip: wager gas 6.9% sanctum TransferFee (couple times, tbf). a single leveraged win at ≥2× delta covers many flips of fees. the fee brrrrss stacSOL → LST hodlers earn.

Here we go again, the conspirators of nonsense are back again. Vipotnik value is ‘not the way things are done at Swansea’ we are told. And we are also advised of the reasons why. ⚽️ That’s here —> fansnetwork.co.uk/football/s… #Vipotnik #Swans #TransferFee #nonsense

🔴 Check 4: Mint close and reinitialization attacks. Token-2022 lets mints be closed via the MintCloseAuthority extension. A closed mint can be recreated at the same address with different extensions. An attacker creates token accounts while the mint has no extensions. Mint gets closed and reinitialized with NonTransferable or TransferFee. Those old token accounts still work — with the old rules. Soulbound tokens that aren't soulbound. Transfer fees that don't apply to pre-existing accounts. KYC-frozen mints bypassed by accounts created before the freeze was set. Checking if a mint currently has no close authority is not enough. You need to verify it was never reinitialized.

Vertrekt die gratis of is er een transferfee?

Solana isn’t just “SPL”. Token-2022 adds TransferFee / extensions. Metridex flags those authorities & odd configs in WHY 🧪 If you’re trading PumpFun mints, this saves headaches.

Jordi #Altena ( 22 🇳🇱 RB/RCM ) van #RKC Waalwijk naar #Hearts in 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿✅ Beetje vertraging maar vandaag is alles afgerond ook al medisch gekeurd A bit of a delay, but everything was finalized today, including a medical check-up earlier! Transferfee around 1.6M

View the Contract for $MANYU here: etherscan.io/address/0x95af4… uint256 fees = 0; if (takeFee) { if (DEXPair[to] && sellingFee > 0) { fees = amount.mul(sellingFee).div(100); } else if (DEXPair[from] && buyingFee > 0) { fees = amount.mul(buyingFee).div(100); } else if (transferFee > 0 && !DEXPair[from] && !DEXPair[to]) { fees = amount.mul(transferFee).div(100); } if (fees > 0) { super._transfer(from, address(this), fees); } amount -= fees; } This was part of the deployed contract code. Next view the MANYU DEPLOYER process here: etherscan.io/txs?a=0x6981649… You can see each step the deployer took. You can see it runs "CHANGE FEE BUY" and sets Buy tax to 0. "REMOVE LIMITS" removed pre-set buying limits. "CHANGE FEE SELL" removed tax from sells. "RENOUNCE OWNERSHIP" - fully locks contract. It took about 10 minutes from the time trading was opened to the time it was renounced. SURE someone could have sniped a 30% taxxed non renounced contract, but the odds are EXTREMELY LOW. Almost 0 even and if they did by THE ODDS THEY ARE STILL HOLDING ARE ALMOST NONE! I guess you can take info from the guy who clearly states he is new to crypto and doesn't know much. Not like people would say whatever to justify things and ignore the facts.

Did you know that a T2022 TransferFee Token on Solana cannot be closed if its witheld_amount > 0? And that when new fees are set, they only activate 2 epoch later? What kind of issues can happen with these behaviors? Share it in the comments

Proud to work with one of the best teams on Solana @RaydiumProtocol. Raydium continues to innovate the Launchpad game and reward creators. -All tokens traded on Raydium share 0.05%–0.10% of fees, paid in SOL forever. -Part of the fees go back into pools, making trades smoother with more liquidity. -Works with Token22/TransferFee token standards. Competition breeds innovation and watching all the new things being built for memecoins is exciting.

🚨 @RaydiumProtocol pushed another update creators finally get a real revenue stream why this matters? → sustainable rewards for creators in $SOL pre and post migration → a cut of fees goes back into the pool → deeper liquidity → works with Token22 and TransferFee = easier launches for teams imo this is the right way to keep builders, traders and launches in one loop Raydium is for the people win and help win ‼️‼️‼️

While everyone was grave dancing on $BONK They pushed new creator incentives alongside @RaydiumProtocol - Creator Fee Share pre-migration - Creator Fee Share post-migration - Token22 Support (including TransferFee) Creators will now earn up to 0.10% of all swaps as rewards, claimable directly on Let’s BONK (Paid in SOL) Do you think we would have ALL of these incentives for devs and creators without BONK and Raydium? Win and Help Win.