#DownWithCBS #SupportForScottPelley #60Minutes #Journalism #TruthInReporting

Labeling crime as a Sharia court distorts facts fuels prejudice and misrepresents Islam a faith rooted in mercy justice and compassion criminal acts must be reported without misleading religious framing. #Shariah #Islam #MediaEthics #News24 #ReligiousFreedom #Journalism #TruthInReporting Read more here: tinyurl.com/4he6n4tj

Truth as a Catalyst for Sustainability: Honoring World Press Freedom Day On this World Press Freedom Day, we at Drishti Foundation Trust recognize that a free and independent press is a fundamental pillar of environmental advocacy and sustainable development. As research writers and sustainability experts, we understand that the health of our planet often depends on the transparency of information. Honest reporting and brave voices are essential to uncovering the truth about climate change, resource management, and social equity, ensuring that policy-makers and the public can make informed decisions based on scientific reality rather than misinformation. Environmental stewardship cannot exist in a vacuum. It requires a robust ecosystem of independent journalism to hold institutions accountable for their ecological footprint and to amplify the stories of grassroots communities fighting for their natural heritage. Without the freedom to investigate and report, many critical environmental issues from illegal deforestation to industrial pollution would remain hidden from global view. We honor the journalists who risk their safety to provide the evidence-based narratives that drive systemic change and foster a more resilient future. At the heart of our mission is a research-driven approach to social good. We believe that data, when communicated effectively through free media, becomes a powerful tool for social and environmental transformation. By supporting independent journalism, we are essentially supporting the transparency required to build self-sustaining communities and protect the biodiversity of our world. Today, we reaffirm our commitment to the truth as we continue "Working for a Better Tomorrow." We invite you to support our research-led initiatives as we strive for a world where information flows freely and ecosystems thrive. Your contribution helps us continue our work in community empowerment and environmental protection. Donate & Support our mission here: rzp.io/rzp/drishti Learn more about our initiatives: drishtifoundation.org #WorldPressFreedomDay #Sustainability #EnvironmentalJournalism #DrishtiFoundationTrust #ClimateAction #TruthInReporting #SustainableDevelopment #SocialGood #PressFreedom @RealGeorgeWebb1 @drunkJournalist @Jonathan_Witt @darkjournalist @AP @PressSec45 @PTI_News @TheFP @MeetThePress @PressClubAust @PressClubDC

When Main Stream Media fire a great reporter who told the truth one must worry about the freedom of the press. Yes I am looking at YOU @CityNewsTO Her last two reports gave those of us who live in Toronto facts. Facts @fordnation would like buried. The fact that these 2 reports are no longer on the website means that this NEWS channel is no longer prioritizing truth-telling. Part of any good newsroom is holding governments to account. We, as viewers, can no longer rely on this from City News. #TruthinReporting #MainStreamMedia

CNN Reporter Faces U.S. Backlash for Exposing Reality in Iran A few days ago, the network sent its correspondent Fred Pleitgen to Iran. In his initial reports, he described life there as relatively calm, with limited queues at gas stations and no protests against the government. But last night he described the situation in Tehran as “hell” after an Israeli strike on an oil refinery. He posted videos saying the sky was raining oily/chemical substances and that the air had become polluted. This description angered Trump and his administration, because they wanted him to talk about massive protests in Iran, claims that the country is preparing to surrender, that its leadership is in disarray, and to promote supposed American victories — rather than report reality in a professional way.🫡🫣 U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Dylan Johnson attacked the reporter and accused CNN of spreading the “Iranian narrative.” Karoline Leavitt, the misleading White House spokesperson also clashed with a CNN reporter and accused the network of bias against Trump. MAGA movement and some hardline politicians, including Lindsey Graham, also joined the attack in a campaign to demonize the reporter and the network. This is an example of what can be described as Western political manipulation/deception, and not only in the United States. “Perhaps I’m also labeled as a supporter of Iran, Putin, and Hamas, and anti‑Semitic—and I’m unaware.”Haha 🫣🙃🤔 #MediaUnderFire #CNNUnderAttack #TruthInReporting #IranCoverage #JournalismMatters

When you tell the truth about law enforcement protecting our communities from criminal gangs... expect pushback from woke tech giants like LinkedIn. The real story is out there because WE put it there. Keep our honest reporting alive, and tell LinkedIn you won't tolerate their attempt at silencing us! 🔗 Learn more: lawenforcementtoday.com/link… #LawEnforcement #News #ICE #BorderSecurity #TruthInReporting

🚨 ICE arrest records show 7,000 gang members removed in one year. LinkedIn removes @bluelivesmtr post telling people about it. 🤡 Experience the clown show here: lawenforcementtoday.com/link… #LawEnforcement #News #ICE #BorderSecurity #TruthInReporting

Welcome to 2026 — a year of informed conversations, legal insight, and accountability. #WelcomeTo2026 #Lawhauz #LegalInsight #Accountability #InformedConversations #LawAndJustice #TruthInReporting

Hey x peeps- an FYI - if you post “breaking” news without any supporting credible sources- you’re just clickbait. If you’re serious and legit - do your homework and give the source. #truthinreporting #dontwasteourtime #TruthMatters

Respectfully, There are NO citations, evidence on this article. So, I asked Grok if this story true? Do you have links to the county vote mention in the article? Answer: “The story you're asking about mixes a kernel of truth with a lot of unsubstantiated claims that appear to be conspiracy theory or misinformation, and NO basis for credible reporting. I'll break it down clearly.” [This reporting tactic of truth with fiction muddies the water for the factual news with propaganda (mistruths, lies) until vetted sources are provided.] ===================== The True Part: The County Vote on State of Emergency Yes, on October 14, 2025, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors voted 4-1 to declare a local state of emergency in response to ongoing federal immigration raids by ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement). The stated purpose was to protect immigrant communities by enabling measures like potential eviction moratoriums for affected residents, increased legal aid, and other support services. Supervisor Kathryn Barger was the sole dissenter, arguing that it stretched emergency powers inappropriately and wasn't about immigration policy but good governance. This is confirmed by multiple mainstream news outlets and official county statements. Here are direct links to reports on the vote: Official announcement from LA County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath's office: lindseyhorvath.lacounty.gov/… ABC News coverage: abcnews.go.com/US/los-angele…? CNN report: cnn.com/2025/10/14/us/los-an… Reuters article: reuters.com/world/us/la-coun… Statement from Supervisor Kathryn Barger explaining her opposition: kathrynbarger.lacounty.gov/b… ============= The False or Unsubstantiated Parts: The Conspiracy Claims The rest of the story—about ICE raids exposing underground tunnels, safehouses, foreign-backed trafficking hubs, organ trafficking, biometric scanners in shelters, encrypted servers, Pentagon cyber units tracing crypto, 113 arrests of "handlers" linked to NGOs/WEF/EU, activated protests with Molotovs/looting, Newsom suing over National Guard deployment, Barger facing threats/break-ins, and a broader "system takedown" reaching Hollywood and Silicon Valley— ******** has NO basis in credible reporting. ********* Searches across news sources and X (formerly Twitter) turn up ZERO evidence for these specifics in connection with the October 2025 raids or the emergency declaration. Instead: Recent ICE actions in LA have focused on standard immigration enforcement, with some unrelated older cases involving drug or human trafficking (e.g., an August 2025 raid on an underground nightclub in El Monte for drugs, but nothing about tunnels under sanctuaries or global networks).” - There are no reports of tunnels, organ trafficking, or foreign intelligence infiltration tied to these events. Claims like shelters built with COVID funds for child transport or data collection lack any supporting documentation from federal investigators or media. - No mentions of 113 arrests linked to NGOs/charities, protests being "activated" in raided zones, or Barger experiencing break-ins/threats post-vote. - Governor Newsom has criticized federal immigration policies but hasn't filed a lawsuit specifically over National Guard in this context. - The story seems to originate from viral X posts and unverified sources, often shared verbatim by accounts promoting conspiracy narratives (e.g., tying it to WEF, cartels, and "global machines")” End of Grok. My OP ED | Editor @TrailsCountry Reporter This is the problem with propaganda news; it bears not party allegiance, but misleads and inflames the public and the Republic with truths mixed with inverted mistruths. For clicks. For views. For agenda? Let’s chat over coffee. Let’s just simply report with facts, and identify Op Ed’s as such. God Bless America #TruthInReporting

The Press Wants Prince Harry Back—The British People Don’t I’m genuinely starting to question whether royal commentators, journalists, or reporters inhabit the same reality as the rest of us. Some of these columns read less like editorials and more like wishful thinking, particularly @TheCeliaWalden recent piece in The Telegraph on why Harry should return in the very “half-in, half-out” role both the late Queen and now the King have firmly rejected. It’s remarkable this argument is still trotted out. The evidence stacked against it is Ben Nevis-sized. To suggest the British people want Harry back is not only tone-deaf but demonstrably false. Coming from a more right-leaning paper, it’s all the more baffling. Walden begins by musing on the oddity of a “54-minute” meeting — filler that drags across paragraphs without adding anything, especially since the timing itself isn’t even confirmed. But the real problem lies in the assumptions she builds from there. She writes: “I think everyone with any ounce of compassion will have been hoping that the Sept 10 meeting was just the start of a deeper rapprochement.” This is where reality collides with fantasy. If compassion is measured by support for Harry, then, by Celia’s logic, the vast majority of Britons are entirely devoid of it. Poll after poll shows overwhelming opposition to Prince William forgiving Prince Harry, or to Harry returning in any capacity. The reasons are clear: Prince Harry and Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex aired vague claims of racism in the Oprah interview, published Spare to expose raw family wounds for profit, released their Netflix series immediately following the Queen’s death, pursued lawsuits while avoiding UK visits over security concerns, and continued to cling to royal titles while publicly criticising the monarchy. Public distrust has only grown with the Sussexes spinning their own narrative in the press — claiming his September 10th meeting with the King signalled a likely return to duties, only for the Palace to swiftly deploy Rebecca English to clarify he was overstating events. The embellishments, the contradictions, the endless performance: these are what shape public opinion, not some supposed lack of compassion. And the sovereigns have been absolutely clear: “There can be no ‘half-in, half-out’ public role for members of the family.” Yet Walden blithely asks, “Why can’t Harry be allowed to be a half-in, half-out royal? That’s essentially what he is now.” He isn’t. Harry is not half-in. He is not half-out. He is out. He and Meghan chose California five years ago. Their pseudo-royal tours aren’t royal tours; they’re cosplay, staging events to look like royal engagements while trying to stick it to the institution they claim was unbearable. Neither Harry nor Meghan represents the Crown in any official capacity. Their notoriety rests entirely on Harry’s bloodline — take that away, and they are celebrities at best, Instagram influencers at worst. And now, after five years of loudly celebrating their “freedom flight,” after calling the family and the British people racist, after branding the monarchy cruel and outdated — Harry wants back in, part-time. Why? If life is thriving in California, why the sudden need for a tether back to the “horrible” Firm? This is precisely why the late Queen Elizabeth II insisted titles not be monetised. “HRH” was shelved. "The Duke of Sussex" title are not to be used for profit. Yet they have been — from Netflix credits to shopping websites and publications to “As Ever.” Titles in the British system are honours, not brands. To exploit them for personal gain debases their history and meaning. Particularly across the Atlantic. This is the very problem Walden romanticises: the Sussexes already act as though they are half-in, half-out, and it’s corrosive. If you enjoy the perks of royalty while profiting from commercialisation on the side, you undermine the Crown itself. The titles need to go, and the break needs to be final. Then comes the most astounding claim in her article: “When you consider the kind of gaffes The Sussexes are prone to if left to their own devices, wouldn’t it also simply be safer for the Palace to have a little involvement in where he goes and who he sees?” So the Palace should bring them back in, simply to contain their chaos? That’s not duty — that’s babysitting. The monarchy is not a PR clean-up crew for the Sussexes’ self-inflicted crises. And as history has shown, whenever Harry is allowed back into the fold, he sprints to the press. To assume that would stop if he were welcomed part-time is naive in the extreme. On charity, Walden paints Harry as uniquely gifted. Yes, he has his causes — HALO Trust, Invictus, WellChild, Archewell. But reality doesn’t match the romantic narrative. Sentebale lost most of its UK staff, trustees and Harry Resigned. Travalyst shed executives. Archewell has gone cold after mass staff departures. Only HALO and WellChild remain unaffected, while Invictus limps on, increasingly strained by reputational fallout. The charity bears the financial burden of accommodating Harry and Meghan at events, while media attention shifts from the veterans themselves to the Meghan’s extravagant wardrobe choices. Participation has steadily declined, with the number of veterans signing up year after year dropping. Taken together, these factors heap further pressure on an already faltering charity under Harry’s watch, highlighting just how unsustainable his involvement has become. Meanwhile, the royals collectively support over a thousand charities: King Charles III alone has 400 , the Princess Royal 200–300, and other senior royals between 30–100 apiece. Harry’s handful is commendable but modest. If he did return, he’d simply be reassigned existing patronages, as any royal is. He is far from the charity juggernaut Walden portrays—at least, not anymore. Then come the predictions: that younger royals will want to work less, that part-time royals are the future. This is pure conjecture. For centuries, new generations have taken up the torch. To claim otherwise is guesswork. Worse, the idea that ‘Megxit proved you can have your cake and eat it’ is absurd. Harry and Meghan have not thrived: Archewell has gone quiet since 2024, their Netflix deal was downgraded, most of their Netflix series have failed with the exception of Harry & Meghan and season one of With Love, Meghan, As Ever is stagnant, her podcasts collapsed, Harry hasn’t expanded his charitable portfolio, and both are reduced to presenting awards at celebrity events. If this is cake, it’s stale. Walden suggests Harry could sign a contract not to step out of line, with penalties if he does. But that contract already exists. It was called the Sandringham Agreement — and they broke it repeatedly. What possible reason is there to believe they’d abide by another? She closes by wondering if Prince Harry might have “learnt from his mistakes.” The evidence says otherwise. His team’s spin on the September 10th meeting — turned instantly into a press circus — shows the pattern hasn’t changed. One step forward, two leaks back. And here lies the truth. Journalists like Walden aren’t reflecting public will; they’re pushing what they want. The press craves the drama, the leaks, the guaranteed headlines of Harry and Meghan ensnared once again in the Firm. In 2024 alone, at least six separate polls — YouGov, Ipsos, Statista, and multiple Express reader surveys — measured the public mood on Harry and Meghan. The results weren’t marginal; they were consistently damning across every metric. ‣ Favourability: YouGov tracked them in negative territory all year. Meghan’s net favourability sat between –40 and –45, Harry’s between –25 and –30. Even the most sympathetic sampling couldn’t lift them into positive ground. ‣ Return to the UK: An Ipsos poll asked whether they should be welcomed back into royal life. Barely 20% said yes. Roughly 60% said no, and the rest didn’t care. A Statista survey ran the same question: Meghan drew 23% support, Harry 28% — both firmly rejected by a majority. ‣ Forgiveness: When Express readers were polled on whether the couple should be forgiven, 80–90% said no. That isn’t scepticism; it’s outright refusal. ‣ Prince William’s stance: Another YouGov poll found nearly 60% of Britons agreed with Prince William’s refusal to reconcile. Only a fraction thought he should cave in. These figures — drawn from multiple independent sources over months — all point in the same, unambiguous direction: the public hasn’t merely cooled; it has turned decisively against them. The data is too detailed, too consistent, and too wide-ranging to be dismissed as “tabloid spin.” This isn’t a nation quietly hoping Prince Harry will return. It’s a nation that has moved on. And yet journalists continue to peddle the fantasy that a “half-in, half-out” comeback would be better for everyone. Let’s be very clear: that illusion exists not in the minds of the British public, but in the imaginations of those who crave the drama — the soap opera — that Harry and Meghan inevitably bring. Support for the couple has never recovered. Favourability, forgiveness, willingness to see them back in royal life — poll after poll shows consistent, unflinching rejection. This isn’t temporary backlash or weariness from overexposure; it is a fundamental loss of trust. The public no longer sees them as useful to the monarchy. They have chosen grievance, branding, and self-interest over duty and service. In a nation where royal relevance is earned through visible work and restraint, that choice is fatal. Six years on from their wedding, the Sussexes are not merely unpopular. They are liabilities. The public doesn’t want them back. They don’t forgive them. They don’t trust them. Meanwhile, Prince William retains the nation’s confidence precisely because he has refused to indulge them. Numbers don’t lie. The evidence doesn’t bend. The Sussexes have lost Britain — and the British people are done waiting for them to earn their place back. The titles need to go. The break needs to be final. End of story. And for anyone still peddling the “it would be good for everyone” line: the people already voted — and they’ve firmly closed the door. #SussexesExposed #RoyalReality #UKMonarchy #NoHalfInHalfOut #TitlesMatter #RemoveTheirTitles #ProtectPeerages #RoyalTruth #BritishPublicSpeaks #MonarchyMatters #SussexDrama #truthInReporting #NumbersDontLie #FOHarry #MeghanMarkleIsTheProblem

A passionate supporter calls for the 'Charlie Kirk Act' to hold media accountable for misinformation. Could this be a game-changer for journalism? 🤔 #MediaAccountability #TruthInReporting #Trump2024

There is a lot of bs on @X as well, so I partake of @MSNBC also ☆☆☆☆☆ #TruthInReporting @MSNBC_reports @AliVelshi @maddow @AnaCabrera @Lawrence @MichaelSteele @SRuhle @jrpsaki @NicolleDWallace @SymoneDSanders #MSNBC #MSNBCLIVE25

Where are the journalists with courage? When a drug destroys lives, and silence becomes complicity… It’s time to write what others are too afraid to touch. Post-Finasteride Syndrome (PFS) is real. Sons are lost. Survivors are suffering. And still — no headlines. We challenge you to: Investigate the Milan Project – groundbreaking research in Italy. Watch @Moral_Medicine – exposing what pharma won’t. Report on @PFSFoundation – holding truth and science. Families are begging for justice. Will you dare to write the truth? #PFS #PFFS #MoralMedicine #MilanProject #PFSFoundation #PharmaExposed #MedicalInjustice #JusticeForHenry #InvestigateNow #WeNeedCourageNotSilence #TruthInReporting

I am going to add to this, that creators that add info that is untrue, and do not clearly identify it as speculation, are revictimizing these victims themselves. It is sad, and enraging to me. I wish internet law would catch up. 'Propaganda' Law needs to change. #TruthInReporting

I would like to see more reporting like this. Headline makes a claim then the article provides historical evidence to back the claim. First rule in apologetics: the claimant must substantiate. Journalism has radically changed and "proof of truth" is needed today more than ever. #truthinreporting #demandtruthinreporting americanfaith.com/candace-ow…

"Breaking: Claims that 'Iran & Israel confirmed' Trump's ceasefire announcement are FALSE. Official sources show neither nation has publicly acknowledged the deal. A critical reminder that in high-stakes diplomacy, verification matters more than declaration. #MiddleEastFacts #TruthInReporting"

It’s literally the only news source I trust! About time they cleared the rest out… #HNN #TruthInReporting 🦚🐙❤️💙💜🧡

🔥🔥🇺🇸❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🔥🔥 Thank you, @StephenM 🇺🇸 For your incredible reporting!🔥👊🔥 We love your strength of character and for always giving us the truth! Keep up the Great work! Truly you are the best!!💯 #LetTruthPrevail @StephenM #TruthInReporting

The BBC's coverage of the Human Rights Watch report on Burkina Faso’s military killing 130 Fulani civilians risks misrepresenting Black and African communities by emphasizing unproven militant ties while ignoring systemic issues. This fuels stereotypes and overlooks Western roles in Sahel instability. Similarly, we condemn Benjamin Netanyahu for war crimes in Gaza, where civilian deaths mount. The BBC must report objectively, avoiding propaganda. All leaders perpetuating violence should face accountability. Fair, nuanced reporting is crucial to challenge misrepresentation and ensure justice globally. #TruthInReporting #JusticeForAll