It seems that you even want your tiredness of the “rhetoric” to be prioritised above the actual experience of IMGs telling you that much of the discourse around prioritisation has crossed into racism and xenophobia.
Let’s be clear: No one is saying "supporting prioritization = automatic racism." That’s a strawman. What people are saying is that the language used to shift the blame onto IMGs frequently crosses the line into xenophobia/racism.
If you don’t think it’s toxic, ask your IMG colleagues how they feel scrolling through medical forums on Reddit. The few who haven’t left have to start every post with a disclaimer: "I support UKGrad Prioritization" just to avoid being piled on. Like a "loyalty test" just to ask a basic clinical or career question.
You cannot claim to care about "collegiality" while dismissing the experiences of the very IMGs on the receiving end of this rhetoric. By ignoring the toxicity, you aren't staying "neutral", you are enabling it to go unchecked.
Structural workforce issues are real. The need to protect UK grads is real. But using those facts as a shield to ignore blatant "othering" and "dehumanization" of international colleagues is a failure of leadership and empathy.
We need to stop prioritizing the "tiredness" of the people starting the fire over the actual burns of the people in it.
I'm so tired of the rhetoric that UKMGs supporting prioritisation are racist. Most UKMGs have no issues with IMGs, they appreciate the benefits of working with them, they would love to work in a system with equal opportunities for all. But the reality is the NHS cannot employ...