今回は１０年間使っている闇OSのWindowsRTレビューしてみます！ 【レビュー】黒歴史OSなWindowsRTのsurfaceを10年使ってみた　＃surface #ジャンクpc ＃vtuber youtube.com/watch?v=GJQZ8P-1…

WindowsRTのsurfaceという黒歴史が家で発掘されたので動画にしますｗ 10年レビューｗｗｗ

windowsRT今でも使っている人おる❓ #ジャンク

Are they teaching Computer Science Wrong - and Why? youtu.be/y72rKtx08vo Here are this week's topics! 00:21 - How do we help younger generations develop the systems-thinking skills? 01:31 - How can someone learning best apply these lessons today? 05:47 - But how do you start? Which languages are manageable to start with on your own? 07:28 - Why do you think that universities and CS programs don’t start from the limited hardware basics? 09:55 - Couldn’t you get a (comprehensive) book and learn a lot that way? 10:43 - What has been your experience with graphics programming ? 12:28 - I’m 30 and just learned my Dad has autism. Any advice? 13:40 - TRS80? Commodore? Try a KIM-1 entering machine code on a hex keypad. 16:12 - In Regina - did you ever run up a phone bill? 17:33 - One of my memories is trying to design a database for my photos. I eventually gave up and years later got an Access database 19:44 - 10 Remember when you.. 20 Were running out of lines numbers… 30…? 20:33 - What to use variable arguments for? 21:03 - Doesn’t the new operator use malloc wthin the runtime? 21:30 - I always thought kernel allocated pages and malloc dealt with fine details of partitioning it ? 22:06 - Why do you need all the layers, instead of just one system call to allocate memory? 22:40 - Isn’t C main variable args? 22:57 - Can you talk about how that’s different from a C pure virtual base class that also doesn’t change? 24:24 - Wasn’t the plan for WindowsRT to be the new start Windows, without backward compatibility? 25:29 - What Windows API methods Dave you have originally implemented? 26:04 - Do you also have odd tools that you stuck with from the past? Maybe some small tools you wrote yourself? 27:35 - Have you ever programmed using a teletype? 28:25 - Thank you for finding a way to get me check, I know know the, why in the way I am. Has anyone thanked you for that before? 29:08 - Nicely done! I 1000% agree with what you lay out in this episode - THANKS - My ONLY critique is … 31:07 - I think this “low tolerance for ambiguity” is most programmers? 32:00 - Why would anyone want to hire a boring neurotypical without any superpowers? 33:15 - I think what you’re discussing is the nature of someone not willing to accept what’s known as Nelsonian Ignorance 34:06 - Is it worth getting diagnosed late? 35:35 - Do we require scarcity for people to act as though resources are scarce? 36:19 - Can Dave tell us the story about the bozoliveshere registry key? 36:35 - Another UofR CS grad here…. did you get to play Star Trek on the Sigma 9 via TTYs, toggle in the bootstrap for the PDP-11/20? 37:09 - As a fellow Canadian, I get a Stuart McLean vibe from this. Gonna call it Prairie Home Computer Companion. 37:35 - Hey Glenn, what happened to your audio for this episode? 38:03 - On Air Mesmerizer is great? Will that be available for those of us with Mesmerizers? 39:04 - Your from Saskatchewan? Epic 39:21 - Did’ja ever run into Joni Mitchell? 41:41 - Outakes and an old man joke…

めっちゃ懐かしい画面。 まだちゃんと動くことに驚き。 #surface #windowsRT

Yeah, so basically I'm trying to make my own "ClickFix" but for Windows binaries by abusing the Windows Runtime, Component Object Model, and whatever Windows grants me from a limited user profile (see attached image) I saw some research on Windows Toast Notifications by @ipurple, but their paper and code was in C# and Powershell. Their technique displayed a fake update and directed the user to a website which then did ClickFix So it's like, WindowsClickFix -> ClickFix I said, "wtf? why not just run program there?" It turns out you can, it's totally possible and well documented for something like C#. Making a simple notification on Windows which impersonates Windows Defender and runs a .exe (or whatever) is pretty shrimple. But.... there is a massive asterisk next to shrimple because it requires some* pain and suffering. In extreme summary, need to do registry entries so Windows knows where to send Toast stuff to. In C# or Powershell this is still relatively simple, just kind of annoying. In C, it still isn't too bad. Unfortunately, I am a person who knows only pain. I didn't want to do C#, or .NET, or do anything with WindowsRT the way Windows wants you to. I said, "well, I've done WinRT in C before, why not do this in C?" Why not make something mildly annoying 200% more difficult? It has been a challenge. I decided to do EVERYTHING with the WinRT / COM. I didn't want to make ANY WinAPI invocations omit RoInitialize (technically CoInitializeEx). In the attached image I've successfully impersonated Windows Security. However, "update" doesn't work the way I'd like to. The easiest thing to do in this scenario is trying to abuse a Windows Scheme URI. Unfortunately, WinRT sandboxes and prevents FILE://, and I can't find a URI to abuse to deliver file execution (I tried). I assume the inability to find a Windows URI to abuse for file execution is why the original authors ended up doing ToastNotification -> ClickFix. Making the Toast Notification go to a web domain is extremely easy. You literally can just specify "button go to website ooga booga" and that's it. Because I couldn't find a URI to execute a binary my only option left is using INotificationActivationCallback. Basically, I have to register my malicious code in the registry to receive Toast Notification callbacks. When "Update" is clicked my binary is notified and appropriate action is taken. Again, this is all totally normal functionality, but it's being used for social engineering. The only caveat here is I am trying to do it as painful and convoluted as possible. I have the general layout done... it's just typing out the code and debugging. It's tiring. I also planned on stripping the headers and making the binary as lightweight as possible. Why? I have no idea. It is totally unnecessary and ass backward logic.

そこで、WindowsRT（違

💻Ο Steven Sinofsky συγκρίνει το MacBook Neo των 699€ με την «αποτυχία» των Windows RT και εξηγεί γιατί η Apple πέτυχε εκεί όπου η Microsoft βιάστηκε. #MacBookNeo #WindowsRT gr.pcmag.com/laptops/51584/m…

WindowsRTマシンもWindows Phoneも持っていたが、ハードは良かったがアプリストア以外の署名ないアプリがインストールできない＆ストアがほぼからっぽだったので何もできないハードだった。あれは完全に戦略ミス

Windowsだから。としか言いようがないんだけど、このせいで昔は音楽系のアプリがまともになかったと記憶している。Macはマシだった。 WindowsRTなんてのもあったような。

しかしこのプラットフォームに依存しない移植性の高さはX-BOXやWindowsRT、最新のSurfaceに活かされました。

最近「Mac使わないの？」って久々に人に聞かれてふわっと考えたんだけど、やっぱMac使わない理由は「飽きた」が一番大きいなあと思うなど。 シンプルに使ってて楽しくないしなあ(WindowsRT以降はWinの方が圧倒的に使ってて楽しい。

WindowsRTといいChromebookといい 結局使い物にならなかったという現実が全てを物語っている

ぶっちゃけ‥ 『ゲームしかやらない』層には、MeとVistaの評価低いと思うわ どっちもメモリ爆乗せして、リソース見ながらメモリマネジメントすればだいたい安定 Windows8(8.1)もサーフェスで真価を発揮したし ‥真のクソOSは【WindowsRT】だよ‥

初めてが何かはともかく、WindowsRTなんてのは仕事でなければ使う機会なかっただろうなぁ(；´Д｀)＞RT

ワープロ用途に買ったWindowsRTタブレットを動かしてみているんだけど、まさかの「ストア版IE」が要約筆記ソフトの「簡易Webサーバ機能」を使った表示機として大変優秀なことが分かりました😂アドレスバーが消せるwww😂

I suppose in a way this was probably WindowsRT. Which failed hard because I couldn't run some win95-era COTS bullshit that props up 60% of F500. You know, or office. I had dreams that the snapdragon stuff would be great, seems not so much.

とっくにサポート終了している WindowsRTだけど オフライン、かつ ワードしか使ってないから まだ動いてくれている 司会のお仕事用のsurfaceちゃん いつもありがとうね

Snapdragon搭載のWindowsノートってどうなの？3社のCPUの総合検証で見えてきたその性能と特性 pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/… >古くはSurface用にQualcommと共同開発したArmベースのCPU「SQ1」を2019年に採用 ‥初代Surface(2012Tegra3搭載)は勘定に入らんのだなと少し物悲しく思うなど ※WindowsRT

#HSP3 WindowsRT(ARM)環境でのDLL呼び出しのインラインアセンブラ問題、頂いた助言を元にGeminiに投げてみたところC でのコードを出してくれたので試したところDLLとCOMオブジェクトの呼び出しに成功しました！！！ Geminiってこんなに賢かったのね...