Elon Musk has become the first trillionaire in history.

Florentino Perez pulling out his 150m galactico signing (Bernardo Silva)

My opinion is that @thepipfarm's Pay With Profits (PWP) model is attractive for traders who have skill but don't want to pay a large challenge fee upfront. Instead of paying the full evaluation cost, you pay a small admission fee and the remaining fee is deducted from your first payout if you become profitable. What makes it appealing and more interesting ? 🔹Lower upfront cost: Easier for traders with limited capital to start. 🔹Risk-conscious traders are rewarded: Traders who maintain lower risk during the challenge can qualify for higher profit splits (up to 90%) and lower PWP fees. 🔹The model offers relatively generous drawdown limits during evaluation compared with many traditional prop challenges. 🔹One-time fee deduction: The PWP fee is only taken from the first payout; afterward, payouts are made according to your profit share with no further PWP deductions. Things traders should consider: 🔹Your first payout can feel smaller than expected because the PWP fee is deducted before profit sharing is calculated. 🔹The model heavily rewards disciplined risk management. Aggressive traders can end up with lower profit splits and higher fees. 🔹Like with any prop firm, you should carefully read payout rules, scaling rules, and risk limits before committing. Overall, if you're a disciplined trader who can generate consistent returns, @thepipfarm's Pay With Profits model can be a cost-effective way to access larger capital. GET FUNDED:partners.pipfarm.com/click?c…