..his phone data does not conclusively prove that. Especially with the whole life 360 issue coming back, you cannot have it both ways. Every single piece of inculpatory evidence of a 3rd party is somehow erroneous yet every single bit of alleged evidence incriminating KR is gospel.
Ffs sakes about your pre sallyport. For one I know Colleen Crawford exists and has a pretty questionable history, seemingly reinforced with the finding that MP has in fact edited, altered and withheld video evidence in other cases. I know KR claimed to pick a piece of taillight out after hitting the traverse and left it at 1 medows that also correlated with the size Barrows testified to. No video or photo of it being found at 1 medow and not a single photo taken of the alleged murder weapon upon it first discovery. All huge red flags and literally everyone would love a direct answer to that question.