Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
We have a wonderful Bridge platform at cardgamers.io Its completely free, no ads, no personal data. On top of it, we wrote a free 11-chapter Bridge guide for complete beginners @ cardgamers.io/learn/bridge @BridgeBase @Bridgewinners @wbfbridges @BrideMag @ACBLbridge
9
Replying to @BridgeBase
A member more than 20 years, with all the abuse that comes with that. You rarely deal with complaints though, and don't even reply to messages. Treating members properly would be much better than a silly video. I'm playing far more bridge elsewhere now - as you push us out.
1
9
Replying to @solana
Quantum computers will break secp256k1. BridgeBase adds ML-KEM-768 to Solana agents today. @BridgeBaseAI
1
2
98
48 hours after launch. 6 agents registered. 10 quantum-safe handshakes verified. 0 unauthorized transactions passed. No funding. No ads. Just a working product. BridgeBase is live 🟢 pqc-gateway-production.up.ra… #Solana #AIAgents #Web3Security
1
3
40
The $270M Drift hack happened 4 days ago. North Korean state actors. Compromised keys. 6 months of planning. BridgeBase would have made this class of attack impossible. This is not a future problem. This is happening right now.
1
3
38
Everyone is building AI agents. Nobody is asking who is signing those transactions. Any code can pretend to be any agent. Any key can be stolen. Any quantum computer will crack them all. BridgeBase fixes this. @BridgeBaseAI
1
2
25
I had no team. No funding. No office. Just a laptop and an idea. 2 weeks later — BridgeBase is live. The first quantum-safe identity layer for Solana AI agents. Real NIST cryptography. Real Solana transactions. Real product. This is what building looks like. 🧵
3
5
80
3/4: BridgeBase is live right now. → Real ML-KEM-768 keypairs → Transaction blocked without PQC token → On-chain reputation on Solana → npm install bridgebase-sdk → Free tier available today No whitepaper. No roadmap. Just working code.
1
1
2
82
Feb 2
Replying to @BridgeBase
Dear BBO. Is the issue fixed or not? Please give an update - as you said you would 'keep us posted'. Thanks
2
261
Feb 2
Replying to @BridgeBase
BBO still down for me in UK
1
1
510
Replying to @BridgeBase
It says you've expired.
2
423
31 Aug 2025
Day-50/60🔥 Web 3 Challenge🚀(Cohort 3.0) Mechanical Engineer➡️Web 3.0 Builder ✅03:01:49 hrs Deep Grind💪 ✅Week 20.1 - Building a bridge🛠️ 📚Today I Learned: Bridge contracts, Understanding BridgeETH code, Understanding BridgeBase code #Web3 #Blockchain @kirat_tw
2
1
6
293
Just launched the BridgeBase Datasets Hub A zero-funded project that gives AI builders and Web3 devs instant access to real datasets & AI Q&A. All open. All free. All built from nothing. 🌐 bridge-base-ai-bridge-base-a… FOLLOW RT if you believe vision #Web3 #AI #OpenData #BuildInPublic

1
1
3
51
18 May 2025
Replying to @BridgeBase
It doesn't matter because when partner finds out you made a vulnerable 2-level overcall with a meager 9-count, your partnership is over.
3
49
20 Apr 2025
Replying to @BridgeBase
K♣️
2
64
Replying to @BridgeBase
What's the objective? Are we trying to allow the contract to make, like the last lead question led to?
1
45
7 Mar 2025
Replying to @BridgeBase
This feels like a blind guess to me. I can devise hands where any suit could work.
2
68
3 Mar 2025
Replying to @BridgeBase
Well, I got this right, but @KarlLimpert is right, this problem is fundamentally flawed. I only got this right because I concluded that partner was lying about something. If partner can't find a 2♦️ bid or a ♦️ lead from the sequence, then it is time to have a talk.
1
1
27
... defense starts in the bidding, so why didn't ptnr mention their super ♦ suit? Either a light (fav-vul) 2♦, or an aggressive 3♦ overcall? And why didn't they lead from their super ♦ suit? Doesn't matter that they didn't lead ♦s - makes on the recommended defence... !
1
1
27
26 Feb 2025
Replying to @BridgeBase
never saw a deck with two jacks of diamonds.
1
5
38