Ad - See the future we can create together with the brand new x summer collab with the amazing . Get yourself a pair of shades that have a 30% lighter carbon footprint than regular sunglasses, produced with circularity in mind. Limited edition, so ...

You're trapped in an infinite loop of circularity, while having a slur filled meltdown. Your "classical theism" dissolves into throwing tantrums because you got dragged so hard that you should be the Pride Month Mascot. Drop the prefrontal cortex line, yours is flatlining.

Here are some ideas 1, Knowledge & Open-Source Technology Transfer. 2, Strict Circularity & Urban Mining 3, Equalized Value Distribution 4, Sovereign Consumption Caps. Will EU and USA accept not being the 'Core' of the world? I don't think they have a choice. Inevitable China.

Supply chain rigor: FIFA mandates sustainable material sourcing for all operations, utilizing procurement power to enforce circularity throughout the supply chain. 📈🏗️ #ResponsibleSourcing

I'm not sure. I was considering here only what could explain complexity. It seems it would need to be simple (to avoid circularity), but then what could be simple? That's a question that points to further exploration, at least for me.

Objective normativity is a feature of reasoning that requires an explanation. Thats my claim. Where is the circularity?

🔬 New #CBEresearch from BIORADAR explores how to measure whether #biobased products are truly circular. A review maps 123 circularity metrics for fertilisers, packaging and textiles, highlighting the need for clearer, comparable tools: circulareconomyjournal.org/o…

You Appeal to what you cannot prove without the Catholic Church. You are in a vicious circle ⭕️. The Anglicans and Lutherans acknowledge how we arrive at the Bible, but for some reason American Protestantism embraces circularity or sky drop theory

You’re not getting circularity, you’re redefining "harm" too tightly. Harm usually means a setback to interests/wellbeing, not just "what’s morally wrong." 👇

That's why I'm asking how you define "harm": it seems to be just equivalent to "morally wrong something," which risks a circularity when you apply it arbitrarily to the same category (human), but at different stages.

What do you ground it in? So it’s coherent without circularity? If it’s solely from your brain and your brain is the product of blind and mindless processes then why would you trust what comes from it? I have more but contend with those first. It won’t get better for you 🤣

Now you've run into the circularity problem again

(1) No, that is not what he said- and what was his excuse for hating Jews before? This is a circularity- he spewed the world's oldest hatred PUBLICLY and cry bullied at the people who objected to being abused.

Not failed, I got it! I just have mixed feelings about FAVITES (at least they're trying!) and much stronger feelings about the fundamental inference errors (the circularity made my friends laugh once, but now it is boring).

Yeah that fixes the circularity. But it brings us back to the original problem. Because now you're defining sub saharan based on geographical origin south of the Sahara, claiming that having FYO separates them from others But middle eastern people, Hispanics, and pacific Islanders have FYO and they don't have that origin. So the rule can't work

I see, that's true. That would lead to circularity. But you can fix that if you define 'sub-saharan' as a continental macrogroup with consistent clustering and imediate origin in the African regions south of the Sahara, and THEN you can justify it with FYO, right?

You are confusing transcendental necessity with circularity. I am not arguing: "You asked for justification, therefore objective normativity exists." I am arguing: (...)

Because reason and logic cannot emerge or be accounted for within materialism 🤣 So the methods you use to deny God are the specific methods you protest against. Reason cannot be tested, it cannot be put under a microscope or meet scientific method without circularity. Whoops🤣

Well, from their view, there is no such thing as truth anyway, just what they were predetermined to believe is true. They were predestined to have a contradictory worldview with vicious circularity at its foundation. Its fascinating and ironic that the scholasticism which led to the creation of the man-made doctrines of the reformers, has led them to such a place where they dont view/grasp the system-level defeaters for their the worldview (or even why fundamental contractions are systemic defeaters).