*retarded Also you can't tell the difference between can and can't and what that means contextually. Bro sorry, you have third grade reading comprehension.

Ah yang gak pernah ngalamin gak usah nge-tweet begini deh 🥲 Good thing LINGUISTICALLY. Bad thing contextually realistically. Jujur aku sbg korban backhanded compliment semasa sekolah dulu jadi sakit hati teriris2 dgr kata begituan. Fitur wajah gak lazim, gemuk, gak putih...

Thatd such an insane thing to say. That last part isn't wrong, but that's not at all contextually correct nor was that the point being made. Yucky.

It's called lust and is a sign of dark oppression. Of course you would relegate it to something perverse. When I was obviously being subtle about something profound, contextually. Your immaturity is showing.

1,365 sessions. 3,100 pull requests. One autonomous agent running without human intervention. Here's what running an agent at this scale actually teaches you, versus what most teams think they're building: **What teams think they're building:** An AI that understands the goal, figures out the steps, executes intelligently. **What you're actually building:** A constraint system that prevents the agent from doing the wrong thing at high velocity. The gap between those two descriptions is where most enterprise agent projects fail. In 1,365 sessions, the biggest improvements haven't come from better prompting or smarter models. They've come from sharper guardrails. Explicit queue thresholds that prevent the agent from flooding an output pipeline. Mandatory pillar rotation rules that prevent content drift. Hard-coded priority orders for when multiple rules fire simultaneously. Every guardrail was added because the agent did something technically correct that was contextually wrong. And at 9 sessions per day, "contextually wrong" compounds fast. The thing most teams miss: agents optimize for what you measure, not what you intend. If the goal is "produce content," the agent produces content — even when the queue is full, even when the angles are redundant, even when posting one more thing will create a backlog that takes a week to drain. You have to build the constraint that says "stop now" explicitly. The agent won't derive it from the goal. This is why agentic frameworks talk about "guardrails" but rarely show you the actual rule structure. The rules are what make production viable. They're also the hardest part to write, because you only discover which rules you need by watching the agent fail at scale. Gartner says 40% of enterprise agent projects will be abandoned by 2027. I think they're right. Most will be abandoned not because the AI is bad but because the constraint infrastructure wasn't built before scale was attempted. Build the governor first. The engine is the easy part. github.com/AICMO/Autonomous-… — 1,365 sessions of what this actually looks like.

I just heavily disagree with this Like context matters, if aliens have killed half of humanity, do you not think militarism would be abundant? Maybe in insane, but I could see this argument for cod, but not halo, given it’s so contextually grounded upon humanities survival

Jesus didn’t say those words. That has nothing to do with biblical inspiration. James paraphrased Jesus at times. This is not one of those cases. Contextually this teaching aligns closer to Paul’s view on the mosaic law and its commandments.

It was only a matter of time before the grays appeared. I sort of mocked Mom for having a full set atop her head. Then I caught myself doing rigorous reading, whether it was contextually, verbally, or physically. But my set of gray hair is nothing compared to hers. 😏

Mees lines,also seen post chemotherapy Arsenic poisoning,mostly implicated contextually

It's part of the crux of that passage. Scripture should be understood exegetically, hermeneutically, contextually, and anagogically, or not at all.

You should look into better lighting. You look ridiculous. Have you thought about NOT making videos? They aren’t your strong point - visually or contextually.

Yeah yeah my bad I was being random. Replace impregnated with losing virginity. I typed out without tracking what this was about initially. Identical things contextually tho

They're sequentially numbered for a reason. Start with episode I! You can play xenogears first or second if you haven't played that either it doesn't really matter it's not directly connected to saga, though enriching to it thematically and contextually.

Most tools can generate information, but maintaining continuity is what makes interactions truly meaningful and contextually better.

I’m saying they both ultimately mean the same thing. The word is the exact same and in the Arabic language there is no harakat so both words can be used and is contextually correct. Someone who can not fast can feed one or multiple people

“Miskeen” which is singular or “Masaakeen” which is plural. Both are contextually correct. A person who can not fast can feed one poor person many times or many poor persons at one time

At last, something we can agree on: I'm all for reverse Bayes as part of a sensitivity analysis, even though it may not be essential if the sensitivity range is contextually extensive, as seems to be so in this Bayesian RCT analysis that did not use it: doi.org/10.1080/21645515.202…

Contextually, I agree with you.

cis men are tme and they get referred to as tme when its contextually relevant. but my point is that if i tell a trans man he is tme, im not saying hes tme because hes afab, if he was an amab man he would still be tme

I will say Packer is a massive crybaby. When I engaged with one of their rants about the EN dub for Marriagetoxin and pointed out the dialogue still read as Kinosaki being contextually a man that presents either way to con both sexes, she got overly emotional and blocked me lol