Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Bube retweeted
That deflection from Jasmine was nasty icl #loveisland #loveislanduk
5
6
157
11,341
Replying to @Castantine @rwlesq
Ahh deflection… Lol. Since you can’t answer ima take that W
1
Replying to @HouseGOP
Deflection. Stop the Iran deal. Protect Israel. End the IRGC. Free Iran.
2
8' A perfect deflection from Tamer with the assist from Adams 🇺🇸
18
Clinton Spark retweeted
Clare O’Neil blaming Aus crisis on Howard’s 1999 CGT discount is pure deflection from her own failures. The real issue: SUPPLY, zoning red tape, NIMBYs, build costs & record migration Fix red tape & build more, stop mass migration, not scapegoat a 27yo policy. 🏠​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​🤦🏻‍♀️
1
6
79
No one said that… the question was about him being called a pedo specifically but good deflection off topic.
2
This is a favorite deflection of theists. Evolution could be completely bunk and it wouldn’t give any more weight to theistic claims. It’s just a distraction to get your beliefs out of the spotlight
1
⋆˚࿔ 𝓚 𝜗𝜚˚ 𑣲 retweeted
aniya immediately calling out his deflection manipulation tactic then leaving him right where he had her fcked up at
The Memes Archive

"F*** the repercussions!" 😱 New doors open and some might close for good on tonight's #LoveIslandUSA - don't miss it at 9pm ET, only on @peacock 🏝️
3
285
2,146
28,170
That in no way was a deflection. It’s me challenging the assumption of a stupid idiotic question. You and your boyfriend are weird af
3
It doesn’t matter where he was tried. He committed crimes that he got officially charged with and was found guilty by a jury that was SELECTED BY TRUMPS LAWYERS. Also your comment is a trump deflection point.
4
Replying to @Tim_Walz
Were you sleeping when the Biden admin went after their political opponents or were you too busy covering up the Somali fraud This here TwinkleToes is classic deflection You should be in prison
1
Replying to @ginamilan_
And a visit to Master Grok gets the real situation: It’s classic political theater from Newsom—framing routine or warranted scrutiny as a “hit list” to rally his base and tee up a 2028 presidential run. @i The post and context Newsom’s exact post today is real. He’s claiming Trump personally directed the DOJ to investigate him and his wife Jennifer Siebel Newsom without evidence of crime, purely for political revenge and because Newsom “calls him out.” He calls Trump the “most corrupt President in American history” and dares him to “come after me.” @gavinnewsom This comes amid years of tension: California suing the Trump admin (and vice versa) over National Guard deployments, immigration, elections, and more. Trump has publicly pushed fraud probes into California’s spending, voting systems, and programs. abc7news.com The substance behind the claims • DOJ inquiries exist: Newsom’s office confirms federal agents recently contacted family, friends, and former employees for records/interviews. One focus is Jennifer Siebel Newsom’s The Representation Project (nonprofit she founded). IRS filings show it paid her ~$1.8M in salary and ~$2.1M to her production company (Girls Club LLC) over years for films, licensing, etc.—often 20-30% of the org’s revenue for a relatively small outfit. Donors have included companies with state contracts or lobbying ties to the Newsom administration. californiaglobe.com • Pre-existing controversies: This isn’t new. Reports (Sacramento Bee, Daily Mail, NY Post, etc.) have highlighted potential conflicts for years—donors who lobby or get state business, “behested payments,” and high compensation relative to impact. Critics call it self-dealing or pay-to-play optics. California has also faced massive fraud issues (e.g., unemployment benefits during COVID). sacbee.com • Trump/DOJ angle: The administration is broadly targeting perceived waste/fraud in blue states like California (election probes, Medicaid, etc.). No public evidence Trump personally ordered a “get Newsom” fishing expedition, but DOJ under any administration investigates high-profile figures, especially with conflicts or public complaints. Declining to comment from DOJ/FBI is standard. Newsom’s “they haven’t found a crime, just trying to” is the predictable spin—investigations start when there are red flags, not after guilt is proven. politico.com Newsom’s framing flips accountability into victimhood: “They’re weaponizing DOJ against me for opposing Trump and eyeing the presidency.” This echoes how politicians on both sides cry persecution when scrutinized (see past Trump probes, or Democratic ones). California has sued the feds dozens of times under Newsom; turnabout isn’t automatically “corruption.” On “most corrupt President” This is subjective rhetoric. Every modern president has scandals, conflicts, or policy critics label corrupt (Obama’s IRS targeting, Biden family dealings, Trump’s businesses/emoluments, etc.). Newsom’s California has its own track record: high homelessness despite spending, EDD fraud billions, crime/retail theft waves, business exodus, and these nonprofit optics. Pot-kettle. Newsom’s not “going anywhere” because he’s term-limited as governor and positioning nationally—standard for ambitious pols. The “country is watching” line is pure messaging. Legitimate oversight of potential self-enrichment via a nonprofit tied to the governor’s office isn’t a “hit list”; it’s part of governing. If no wrongdoing, it should clear them. If issues exist, accountability applies regardless of party. The heavy perfume of deflection is there.
20
Hey Kathy , you’re fat and ugly! What ? I changed the subject! Thats exactly what you did! The subject was said by a liar who claimed Trump was screaming! You did the democrat deflection dance, ignoring the main point! Go fuck off and don’t come back!
Always deflection, never accountability
13
Btw, I can also fight in the mud you are trying to pull me in! I don't think someone who calls another human "dirty illegal immigrant" is smart! You are at best, a scapegoating, dehumanising, street vigilant who uses deflection to mask ur lack of objectivity.
5
Only takes a visit to Master Grok: It’s classic political theater from Newsom—framing routine or warranted scrutiny as a “hit list” to rally his base and tee up a 2028 presidential run. @i The post and context Newsom’s exact post today is real. He’s claiming Trump personally directed the DOJ to investigate him and his wife Jennifer Siebel Newsom without evidence of crime, purely for political revenge and because Newsom “calls him out.” He calls Trump the “most corrupt President in American history” and dares him to “come after me.” @gavinnewsom This comes amid years of tension: California suing the Trump admin (and vice versa) over National Guard deployments, immigration, elections, and more. Trump has publicly pushed fraud probes into California’s spending, voting systems, and programs. abc7news.com The substance behind the claims • DOJ inquiries exist: Newsom’s office confirms federal agents recently contacted family, friends, and former employees for records/interviews. One focus is Jennifer Siebel Newsom’s The Representation Project (nonprofit she founded). IRS filings show it paid her ~$1.8M in salary and ~$2.1M to her production company (Girls Club LLC) over years for films, licensing, etc.—often 20-30% of the org’s revenue for a relatively small outfit. Donors have included companies with state contracts or lobbying ties to the Newsom administration. californiaglobe.com • Pre-existing controversies: This isn’t new. Reports (Sacramento Bee, Daily Mail, NY Post, etc.) have highlighted potential conflicts for years—donors who lobby or get state business, “behested payments,” and high compensation relative to impact. Critics call it self-dealing or pay-to-play optics. California has also faced massive fraud issues (e.g., unemployment benefits during COVID). sacbee.com • Trump/DOJ angle: The administration is broadly targeting perceived waste/fraud in blue states like California (election probes, Medicaid, etc.). No public evidence Trump personally ordered a “get Newsom” fishing expedition, but DOJ under any administration investigates high-profile figures, especially with conflicts or public complaints. Declining to comment from DOJ/FBI is standard. Newsom’s “they haven’t found a crime, just trying to” is the predictable spin—investigations start when there are red flags, not after guilt is proven. politico.com Newsom’s framing flips accountability into victimhood: “They’re weaponizing DOJ against me for opposing Trump and eyeing the presidency.” This echoes how politicians on both sides cry persecution when scrutinized (see past Trump probes, or Democratic ones). California has sued the feds dozens of times under Newsom; turnabout isn’t automatically “corruption.” On “most corrupt President” This is subjective rhetoric. Every modern president has scandals, conflicts, or policy critics label corrupt (Obama’s IRS targeting, Biden family dealings, Trump’s businesses/emoluments, etc.). Newsom’s California has its own track record: high homelessness despite spending, EDD fraud billions, crime/retail theft waves, business exodus, and these nonprofit optics. Pot-kettle. Newsom’s not “going anywhere” because he’s term-limited as governor and positioning nationally—standard for ambitious pols. The “country is watching” line is pure messaging. Legitimate oversight of potential self-enrichment via a nonprofit tied to the governor’s office isn’t a “hit list”; it’s part of governing. If no wrongdoing, it should clear them. If issues exist, accountability applies regardless of party. The heavy perfume of deflection is there.
24
Replying to @nosoup4knowles
Deflection also noted ✅
1
3