You literally called Alex "a retarded lawyer" and then lecture him about insulting your intelligence
There is a serious flaw in your logic and the Constitution illustration actually gives the perfect illustration of it. Constitutional theory is itself a product of a kind of rationalism and idealism. The idea that a document can stand as an authority and be the binding legal force is a peculiar idea that appears on the scene only in very recent history. It's certainly not a concept that would have been meaningful to the Apostles.
The idea that God would delegate his authority to a document, in this case the scriptures is certainly an odd one from a historical perspective, and is unquestionably the unique product of late medieval philosophy.
In contrast to this, authority in the ancient world, including the cultures that produced the scriptures, would have been understood as something that is real, manifest, and delegated hierarchically. One of the more serious issues with Sola Scriptura is that it completely sidesteps this Hierarchy and essentially removes God as the active source of authority. One consequence of this is that what the Bible says about authority and those who hold it becomes difficult to understand in your model.
You have reduced God to a historical figure who prescribed the scriptures as something analogous to a constitution in history, but his only real relationship to it now is as its historical source and one who will hold us accountable in some indeterminate future.
In contrast to that we are realists. We view authority as something active and real, with God not as a distant historical source but at the active authority who actively orders creation through a hierarchical structure with the Church as the principal bearer of this authority, again with Christ God at its head.
You have to know this to make sense of our critiques of your position. Again, yours is a collapse of the historical concepts of authority and their reduction to mere abstractions, and it is to us essentially the removal of Christ from any active agency in the Church and his replacement with an amorphous concept of propositional Truth.
Christ is not King in your system, not in any meaningful sense. In contrast in ours Christ stands as King who actively rules and in whose name the bishops of his Church oversee the administration of his Kingdom, and in this system the scripture stands as the highest rush decree to which all of his ministers are bound and which they can not lawfully violate