Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Guillermo Proaño retweeted
Kathleen Herles says it took her years as an adult to feel confident saying she was the original voice of Dora The Explorer. “Growing up as Dora, I think it made me kind of hide that part of myself for such a long time... my husband has really been pushing me to be more confident and more appreciative of that part of my life.”
16
480
7,028
142,489
K6734 Slave of Allah retweeted
Special mission patches worn by Turkish soldiers assigned to protect the Çağrı Bey drilling vessel during its oil exploration mission in Somalia have been revealed for the first time.
3
6
18
372
Lee retweeted
Yesss. Every time you’re recruited by low interest ppl, they’re extracting value from you. And when you find yourself explaining someone’s behaviour to others more than they’re demonstrating care for you, that ratio is the answer. Let me explain…
Normalize walking away from low-interest men. Not tomorrow. Immediatelyyyyyyyyy.
3
145
1,460
76,910
u.n.c.l.e Lwanga retweeted
WATCH: Nalongo Zawedde Lubwama Lukwago, the wife of the PFF President and a lawyer in Dr. Kizza Besigye's treason case, explained the events that led to the reported abduction of her husband by armed men on Monday morning. #NTVNews Before his alleged abduction, Erias Lukwago posted on social media that two "drones" and security operatives had sealed off his home. 📹 @Ibrahim_Kavuma
11
15
144
10,326
VonLaySki⚒️ retweeted
Gavin Newsom’s “housing first” disaster has cost California $24 billion with zero accountability and homelessness exploding—now HUD is shutting off funding to LA’s billion-dollar bureaucracy for fraud and not even being able to prove the housing exists. The money has gone to cronies and failed nonprofits instead of helping people who need treatment and real results. It’s time to enforce the law, end the waste, and demand outcomes—not more excuses from Sacramento.
The Homeless Money Machine Just Lost Its Plug. HUD shuts off a billion-dollar bureaucracy that couldn’t prove its own houses exist. @CaliforniaGlobe full article below
19
133
335
4,930
🇪🇸 Beny 🇪🇸👑💚🏳️‍🌈 VOX 🍀 retweeted
Quiero tener una conversación con la gente que se encarga del empaquetado de medicamentos. @Farmaenfurecida alguna explicación razonable que yo desconozca o sólo se sienten originales?
113
29
483
371,914
Yugi601 retweeted
I have a confession. I’m seriously starting to doubt the value of debates as they’re currently being done. Let me explain. William Lane Craig debates were influential in parts of my spiritual development. Seeing a Christian make a well-reasoned case made me realize it was okay to be a Christian intellectual. The debates were well-organized and carried out. Even when Craig’s opponent got the upper-hand I left feeling encouraged and challenged by the exchange. Fast forward to becoming a Protestant apologist. Rather, having it fall into my lap as an important need, especially when there are very few Protestant analytic philosophers that do Protestant apologetics. Most do philosophical theology or take on atheist objections to the faith. Going this route means leaving behind the comfort of academia. I see the value in debates well-done. However, recently… I have really began to sour toward the “debate me, bro!” culture online, especially here on X. Bloodsport challenges and debates have less to do about a productive quest for mutual understanding and truth. They have more to do with performance, scoring points, and entertainment. Such exchanges devolve into mudslinging during and after the debates. They bring out the ugly side of apologetics. But, I think I can take this a step further… I’ve been reading Proverbs to prepare for preaching on the book this summer. In Proverbs we read in 16:21: "Sweetness of speech increases persuasiveness." And in 15:28 we read: "The heart of the righteous ponders how to answer." Sweet speech and pondering how to answer are not rewarded in bloodsport debate culture. What is rewarded are quick responses that are sharp and forceful. And framing and rhetoric are crucial if you’re going to “win” the room. You can win the debate in that regard and not have made the better actual case. Then we have all the posturing online. The “callouts”, the saying this person is “afraid”, and on and on. This is often about self-promotion and pride. It’s about trying to look good in the eyes of others. It’s not primarily about the pursuit of wisdom and truth. Online apologetics debate culture promotes folly, not wisdom. That’s the tentative conclusion I’ve come to. Is there a place for debate? Yes. Is there a way to do it in pursuit of wisdom? Yes. Has the algorithm rewarded and engrained a form of debate that is rooted in pride and folly? Yes. And I’m realizing that I don’t want to contribute to that sort of culture. I want to offer more of a positive case for Protestantism that is encouraging and makes the Gospel more attractive to onlookers. I don’t want to spend whatever precious time I have to do this posturing-up or bowing-up to try to look tough. I want my confidence to be rooted in Christ, not in my abilities. I know this note doesn’t have a punchy conclusion. But it does have the start of me processing what I’m seeing online and how I want to strive in Christ to promote something else, even if that something else isn’t rewarded by the algorithm.
34
8
98
8,762
roberto miraballes retweeted
Soy hija de un camionero nacional, me crié casi sola porque mi viejo tenía que irse laburar 3 días de corrido porque lo explotaban con viajes enganchados, aunque fuese de noche, aunque se entierre el camión, soy hija de un tipo al que le pagaban la mitad del sueldo en negro.
Transportistas EVADEN 120 millones de dólares al año y tienen 23% de sus TRABAJADORES EN NEGRO. Que se termine el berrinche histérico.
39
112
581
34,917
Dariusz Ski retweeted
Replying to @BROKENBRITAIN0
This is ID Cards through the back door, and is the real reason why they're doing this, as predicted and explained by Frances Stonor Saunders.

8 Apr 2025
Replying to @BigBrotherWatch
From Frances Stonor Saunders: This makes very interesting reading, if you are against ID cards then read this and then send it out to as many people as you can. Chris. pistonheads.com/gassing/topi… ID Cards, the truth. This was written by Frances Stonor Saunders. Frances Stonor Saunders is the former arts editor of The New Statesman, author of The Cultural Cold War, Diabolical Englishman and The Devil's Broker and was awarded the Royal Historical Society's William Gladstone Memorial Prize. She lives in London. "You may have heard that legislation creating compulsory ID Cards passed a crucial stage in the House of Commons. You may feel that ID cards are not something to worry about, since we already have Photo ID for our Passport and Driving License and an ID Card will be no different to that. What you have not been told is the full scope of this proposed ID Card, and what it will mean to you personally. The proposed ID Card will be different from any card you now hold. It will be connected to a database called the NIR (National Identity Register) where all of your personal details will be stored. This will include the unique number that will be issued to you, your fingerprints, a scan of the back of your eye, and your photograph. Your name, address and date birth will also obviously be stored there. There will be spaces on this database for your religion, residence status, and many other private and personal facts about you. There is unlimited space for every other details of your life on the NIR database, which can be expanded by the Government with or without further Acts of Parliament. By itself, you might think that this register is harmless, but you would be wrong to come to this conclusion. This new card will be used to check your identity against your entry in the register in real time, whenever you present it to 'prove who you are'. Every place that sells alcohol or cigarettes, every post office, every pharmacy, and every Bank will have an NIR Card Terminal, (very much like the Chip and Pin Readers that are everywhere now) into which your card can be 'swiped' to check your identity. Each time this happens, a record is made at the NIR of the time and place that the Card was presented. This means for example, that there will be a government record of every time you withdraw more than £99 at your branch of NatWest, who now demand ID for these transactions. Every time you have to prove who you are, your card will be swiped, and a record made at the NIR. Restaurants and off licenses will demand that your card is swiped so that each receipt shows that they sold alcohol to someone over 18, and that this was proved the access to the NIR, indemnifying them from prosecution. Private businesses are going to be given access to the NIR Database. If you want to apply for a job, you will have to present your card for a swipe. If you want to apply for a London Underground Oyster Card, or a supermarket loyalty card, or a driving license you will have to present your ID Card for a swipe. The same goes for getting a telephone line or a mobile phone or an internet account. Oyster, DVLA, BT and Nectar (for example) all run very detailed databases of their own. They will be allowed access to the NIR, just as every other business will be. This means that each of these entities will be able to store your unique number in their database, and place all your travel, phone records, driving activities and detailed shopping habits under your unique NIR number. These databases, which can easily fit on a storage device the size of your hand, will be sold to third parties either legally or illegally. It will then be possible for a non-governmental entity to create a detailed dossier of all your activities. Certainly, the government will have clandestine access to all of them, meaning that they will have a complete record of all your movements, from how much and when you withdraw from your bank account to what medications you are taking, down to the level of what sort of bread you eat - all accessible via a single unique number in a Central database. This is quite a significant leap from a simple ID Card that shows your name and face. Most people do not know that this is the true character and scope of the proposed ID Card. Whenever the details of how it will work are explained to them, they quickly change from being ambivalent towards it. The Government is going to COMPEL you to enter your details into the NIR and to carry this card. If you and your children want to obtain or renew your passports, you will be forced to have your fingerprints taken your eyes scanned for the NIR, and an ID Card will be issued to you whether you want one or not. If you refuse to be fingerprinted and eye scanned, you will not be able to get a passport. Your ID Card will, just like your passport, not be your property. The Home Secretary will have the right to revoke or suspend your ID at any time, meaning that you will not be able to withdraw money from your Bank Account, for example, or do anything that requires you to present your government issued ID Card. The arguments that have been put forwarded in favour of ID Cards can be easily disproved. ID Cards WILL NOT stop terrorists; every Spaniard a has compulsory ID Card as did the Madrid Bombers. ID Cards will not 'eliminate benefit fraud', which in comparison, is small compared to the astronomical cost of this proposal, which will be measured in billions according the LSE (London School of Economics). This scheme exists solely to exert total surveillance and control over the ordinary free British Citizen, and it will line the pockets of the companies that will create the computer systems at the expense of your freedom, privacy and money. If you did not know the full scope of the proposed ID Card Scheme before and you are as unsettled as I am at what it really means to you, to this country and its way of life, I urge you to email or give it to your friends and colleagues and everyone else you think should know and who cares. The Bill has proceeded to this stage due to the lack of accurate and complete information on this proposal being made public. Together & hand in hand, we can inform the entire nation if everyone who receives this passes it on. Please make sure you do this."
4
5
448
goitatu retweeted
El bon sou de l'imam de Salt segur que també el paguem nosaltres, a través d'alguna fundació subvencionada. A PSIBORN 10, explico com la Fundació Ibn Battuta rep diners de la Generalitat, Diputació, Ajuntament, Aigües de Barcelona i Fundació La Caixa.
32
1,100
1,280
21,810
yosua ven acapaqui retweeted
1
9
73
8,830