an e ways flori was 1 of those parasocial fans if u wanna see her tweets hypothesizing abt isaac’s COCK TIP lmk
8
Excellent thinking!! I love it! It’s amazing how people get their heads together and start thinking, researching, fitting pieces together and hypothesizing theories over this case. It’s pulled people from other countries together, as well. Now, tonight after seeing the porch light (well, I’m still working on really “seeing” it) video with the possible reflection scene of what may have gone down with Nancy and others, it really hit me hard and in the gut and heart. What she may have gone through really upset me. We have all these people who want to help solve this case and so many hindrances in the way. I just want justice for everyone involved right down to our streamers. 💪
1
12
i think leon fits pretty snugly in a men’s M ( his official stats make him a M-small but like 155 lbs is Fake to me he’s like at least 175) so maybe M-L? chris is like what 6’1 220? this is super contingent on like a billion things and i am afab so im . Hypothesizing
2
25
421
I don't either, just hypothesizing a trade where losing Spence isn't a loss (it's very hard to come up with one and they're all unlikely)
27
According to whom?
Hypothesizing about potential is perfectly acceptable.
218
11h
Materialists use their mind to start with the premise of nothing, often not realizing that the very use of their mind in that act of hypothesizing is always and unavoidably a "something". In other words, a mindless origin for *anything* is functionally impossible, as your act of comprehending that origin always originates from a mind.
Using the mind to imagine and assert an origin of mindlessness is peak nonsense.
One of the reasons I find the argument from design compelling is that it starts with something we actually, directly know.
We know minds exist.
And we know what minds do, they generate information, specified complexity, language, codes, engineering, and intelligible systems. These are all things we directly observe minds producing.
What’s interesting is that when it comes to the world, atheists reason in the opposite direction. Instead of starting with the known, they begin by assuming nature is not the product of a mind. They say the world is “natural” meaning that it isn’t caused by a mind. Then, because the “natural world” contains information, complexity, and intelligibility, they conclude these things must be capable of arising without a mind.
This is totally backwards.
If we’re trying to determine whether something comes from a mind, we shouldn’t begin by starting with an unknown and assuming the answer. We should start with the only known source of information rich, specified, goal directed systems that we have direct experience with… minds.
Then we ask whether the natural world exhibits the kinds of features that minds produce.
And it does.
The atheist starts with the assumption that nature is undesigned and then concludes that information, complexity, and intelligibility must be capable of arising without a mind.
The design argument starts in the opposite direction by observing minds are the only known source of information, meaning, codes, and specified complexity. The world is filled with these things. Therefore, the most natural inference is not that minds are unnecessary, but that the world itself is the product of a mind.
3
3
10
1,178
won't believe ... it ... ❞
upon noticing how unnaturally gloomy things were in both the city and with the woman in front of her, she blinked.
clearly, something had happened which she had to be filled in on. or maybe the day that she had been hypothesizing had come.
❝ are
1
8
For some, but not for most of us meant to pioneer cutting edge tech. We laid our foundations by living with the tech, way beyond what books teach. long after you've gotten a PhD we're still learning and exploring, not hypothesizing and pontificating theories. To be honest, the folks responsible for overseeing tech development in this country despise and make fun of smug PhD folks on the daily, they call them 'expensive calculators'.
8
14h
from this line I’m hypothesizing it may be some adaptation of the fall of the house of usher? but it’s just my hypothesis
1
2
15
no amount of hypothesizing or what if tweets are gonna prepare us for this 😭😭😭 let's just NOT THINK
3
402
lots of old speculation theories hypothesizing that Musk is part of the beyond story with Cohen’s Teddy emerging post SpaceX ipo as a new entity for GameShire Hathaway
Pure speculation.
1
35
Jun 15
Recent discussions on social media emphasize our impending arrival at a reckoning where the data cannot be ignored. Polygenic preimplantation genetic testing is here. It’s no longer science fiction. I’m hypothesizing a surprising percentage of parents would jump on the opportunity to genetically engineer a smarter child. What worked in the past - handwaving and obfuscation - is not an option.
1
2
107
Hypothesizing on the thread: This crash wasn't a high-altitude failure with rapid descent trapping people. The Pacific Aerospace P750 took off from Butler Memorial Airport ~11:30am local, climbed briefly, turned back for an unknown issue, and impacted ~300 yards from the runway in a field, erupting in flames. All 12 (pilot 11 skydivers) perished on board.
Right after takeoff during initial climb, altitude was minimal—likely a few hundred feet. Safe parachute deployment requires far more height (typically 2,000-3,000 ft minimums depending on experience/type), open door, and stable conditions. None of that existed yet. Passengers were probably still seated/preparing. The pilot's turn-back attempt fits a low-altitude emergency where jumping wasn't an option. NTSB/FAA investigation ongoing; cause unknown.
1
1
56
Jun 14
i primarily heavily prefer thematic analysis and hypothesizing about deltarune, but i think my favorite pure plot pet theory ive come across is "prior to chapter 1, was there a different soul piloting kris, and are they slowly realizing this as the chapters continue"
2
3
24
Jun 14
Using that analogy, then, isn’t it like criticizing a library for failing to function as a gym that promised it could be a gym? Based on your observation, it seems like universities have departed from their original mission, probably to chase the almighty dollar. It means my degree is worthless, because it was never the purpose of my university to teach me things that could be translated into a job. I’m not actually criticizing, I’m merely trying to flesh out what you’re saying so that I can properly contextualize it. You might be right, I don’t know. I’m merely hypothesizing, based on your statement, that universities have failed us by trying to be everything to everyone, instead of trying to simply contain knowledge. Physics and math are subordinated in favor of modern popular subjects that can’t possibly anchor civilization, like STEM subjects can.
1
64
Jun 14
I'm not sure trading has ever been as much fun as hypothesizing and building robust portfolio models with AI.
AI feedback isn't 100% reliable but if the right guardrails are put in place, I feel like there can be a lot more confidence in the feedback.
The satisfaction comes from speed of working with AI, yes. But it's also the confidence in knowing when you're actually making progress without spending days backtesting on what might not be reliable data anyway.
And it's not like the AI is doing all the work, limiting sense of purpose for ourselves. We still need to guide the process, we still need to figure out the best team of models on the portfolio from a holistic angle, while the AI works in the trenches.
It's fun being the commander for a change.
1
78
Jun 14
i love speculating and theorizing and hypothesizing when i have absolutely zero business in doing so 😊
21