Does
@Starknet need more dapps?
Ofc Starknet needs more dapps!
Not one perfect flagship- but many, across different tracks
Cause one consumer dapp is a demo, not an eco
But 10 dapps across multiple tracks? That’s wen things get real
ℹ️Privacy Track
We don’t need one private dapp, we need private payments, private social features, private actions in games and DeFi
Users should choose how and where to be private, not accept a single default
ℹ️Bitcoin Track
One
$BTC dapp is an experiment, many
$BTC dapps means different UX for Bitcoin users, different yield and usage models, different bridges and onramps.
That’s wen Bitcoin users actually start using Starknet, not just watching
ℹ️Open Track
No limits here: consumer dapps,games,social,weird and bold ideas.
Half of them will fail - good. The rest will give users a reason to come back
Eco don’t grow from one perfect product
It grow from chaos and choice:
where it’s easier,
where it’s more fun,
where it just works.
Many dapps, many tracks, many experiments and Starknet becomes for everyone
So give us 10 consumer dapps, privacy by choice, Bitcoin users, and a few crazy experiments.
That’s how a real eco is built 🔥
Re{define} Hackathon is here.
$21.5K in prizes. Feb 1–28. Fully virtual.
Build trustless apps on
@Starknet, where STARKs meet Bitcoin and privacy solutions.
Registration open now ⬇️
hackathon.starknet.org/