Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Thatโ€™s what the whole comment chain was about. Youโ€™re the illiterate one.
Also was scared of trump, and refused to run a third time.
Please read a book to understand how checks and balances are intended to work. Youโ€™re welcome!
2
It's a legit court checking a rogue president, but enjoy your delusions
1
4
Rogue courts with zero standing are not checks and balances but feel to post the statute that allows this. Itโ€™s why every court that has ruled similarly has been overturned.
1
1
They do. Lol the founding fathers intended checks
1
6
Yes because he didn't lose an election between his two terms.
The Ghost of Thaddeus Stevens retweeted
He wasnโ€™t nominated 3 times for president by his party like Trump was
32
3
468
13,644
Replying to @mcdev
Yes, that is the official narrative.
10
J retweeted
Replying to @therobbieharvey
Makes me want to puke.
1
7
165
In my opinion I don't want to see another administration like this fucking shit show that we're living through right now. Excuse my language...
1
11
Exactly my point. Also if something were to happen to whatever sitting president the vice president of course is sworn in as president. Said vice president can still run twice after that.
1
13
Nah you're cool. My response was assuming if you don't win consecutive terms (win 1, lose 1) you could run a 3rd time but obviously a president could choose to skip a term and still only run twice. So you are right that they wouldn't have to win consecutively to only run twice.
1
10
I think I might have posted my post on the wrong post? ๐Ÿค”
1
8
It's not incorrect. You can run for president as many times as you are elected by your party. Once you win twice you can no longer run again. When someone wins consecutive terms they cannot run for 3rd. Trump could only run a 3rd time bc he lost to Biden. ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ
2
1
12
Satire: "uses exaggeration, irony, parody, or absurdity to criticize or comment on something. There has to be some obvious indication that the speaker isn't presenting the claim as true". Otherwise it's just a false claim. Your comment has none of the above. You are muted now.
1
10
Stef Fanski retweeted
Five SEC championships.
5
1
125
3,408