That's not how economies work.
Any number i could give as a response would be fantastical and straight out of my ass.
And even if they did you could give them 1 quadrillion and it would still not help.
Wealth is generated via production.
By donating to africa for example all we have managed to do is destroy their existing industries. Did you know africa's GDP used to rely on the export of textiles? Well textiles are now a fraction of what it used to be. Even by aggressively donating to them, even by donating things like clothes and shoes, all we have managed to do is destroy their textile industry because no one was buying.
This is why investing good and Constant donating bad.
Imagine if we invested in their textile industry back in the 80s instead of just giving them a bunch of cash. Maybe the new PUMA and Adidas would be african.
This is plain economics.
But right now we can't invest. You know why? Because the CPI in africa is insane.
4
88
By your logic, there’s a threat a bear might eat me?
1
1
11
Because this is an incredibly wealthy country that has ~zero people starving to death that don’t have a neurodivergent disease where they forget or just get lost in the woods or something like that and the homeless rate is like 0.1%
1
21
Idk if it’s privileged when it applies to 99% of people. Seems just the baseline.
1
26
the retard blocked me apparently. just figured i'd say as much. also, this dumbass makes legal positivists seem like they have a morally coherent position. he seems to base what he considers moral purely on his own whims, and can't even muster the intelligence to justify it with-
1
3
Most people aren’t agreeing to jobs under thread of homelessness and starvation
1
3
52
If the government were to kill it’s own civilians for no reason would it be murder?
13
There's a reason the workers are the workers and it's not because they are smart people, otherwise they wouldn't be the workers.
1
5
LandianJewMarxistOhioGroyper retweeted
If that’s socialism than Anarcho-Capitalists and Libertarians are socialist
Bro hasn’t heard of Karl Hess
1
1
4
74
Jun 12
idiots will read a sentence, ignore any word they are too stupid to understand, and come out with a sentence made up of only a few words that they misinterpret as the original sentence. how dumb is that?
12
Jun 12
"monopoly on the legitimate use of force = anything that uses force" top mind moment right here. so you're saying that because you need to use force to stop people who use force to do bad things, therefore the moral principle of not being the first to use force is invalid.-
1
2
15
