It doesn't matter how clean it is if the cow has an infection. Tuberculosis was defeated by pasteurisation. You want Brucellosis instead? Pasteurisation barely changes the taste, but protects against all these and more.

Cows drag their udders through their own shit, all day long. That raw milk you drank was contaminated with fecal matter, every single time. Pasteurisation kills all of that bacteria and more. Just because you go lucky that doesn't make it a good idea.

Our ancestors also used to die from it. Then they started boiling the milk before consuming which itself is pasteurisation. Aur wahi tradition ab tak chalu hai, we boil the packet wala milk even though it's already pasteurised.

And all that goes with it. Louis Pasteur invented pasteurisation for a reason. It's your choice but no need to promote it and the natural bacteria that goes hand in hand.

That’s not bloody true at all!!! I work in a dairy processing plant. We extract the lactoferrin and sell it as is before it hits the pasteurisation stage. However then plant is full and misses the lactoferrin stripping process those proteins just stay in the milk and are still there after the pasteurisation stage.

I agree with the principle that farmers must be paid fairly. My point is only that the retail price is not the farmer’s price. Between the farm gate and the shelf there is collection, transport, processing, pasteurisation, packaging, refrigeration, distribution, shop labour, wastage, compliance, marketing, business rates, energy costs and the retailer’s margin. All of those stages have real costs too. So yes, if the extra margin genuinely goes back to the farmer, that is a good thing. But we should be careful not to imply that everyone after the farm gate is simply taking unfair profit. The real question is transparency. How much does the farmer receive? How much goes into processing and logistics? How much is retained by the retailer? If the answer shows the farmer is getting a fairer share, I would support that. But the claim needs to be evidenced, not just assumed.

Lactoferrin is often added to milk after pasteurisation.

Rothschilds had nothing to do with pasteurisation. Cows milk is not a big source of lactoferrin in any case ans pasteurisation reducit a bit but doesn’t remove it all. But you can make your own lactoferrin and it isn’t necessary to get a regular intake.

Tout est fait pour que notre microbiote soit détruit; pollution, pasteurisation, hybridation, aliment appauvri, mais refaire sont microbiote est très facile manger sainement avec des aliments entiers, légumes fermentés, viande, bouillon d’os, … @vitalholis

Lactoferrin's antimicrobial properties are gentle and preventive, but it cannot kill or stop hard-hitting pathogens like Myobacterium tb , Salmonella or E.coli. Milk pasteurisation is prioritizing public health over nutritional density. Lactoferrin is available as supplement.

0.000*11% vs 0.00106% Or 10x worse. Pasteurisation is fine.

Calf Rearing & Milk Pasteurisation – Scotland youtu.be/NQ3SUHFYOek?si=Mljz… via @YouTube I found this video on yutube . Both types of the pasteurisers seen here can pasteurise both colostrum and real milk for feeding the calves, and are supplied by our firm.

This is the real #Toolkit Regional party disintegration and damage to the federal structure- pasteurisation and homogenisation of a saffron ideological milk.

Pasteurisation.

Revise your school notes especially on Pasteurisation discovered by Louis Pasteur. Try to also Google what UHT in that milk entails.

i mean pasteurisation was created by him but it was a necessary and revolutionary invention at the time he was alive, along with many other things he invented in regard to germs. but taking it extremely far to where nothing unpasteurised can exist is a modern thing, and more so a non-european thing

🤯🚨 LE LAIT CRU N’A PAS ÉTÉ INTERDIT POUR VOTRE SANTÉ… MAIS POUR VOTRE PORTE-MONNAIE. 💥Dans les années 1930, les Rockefeller ont breveté des machines industrielles très coûteuses pour pasteuriser le lait. 🔥Pour créer la demande, ils ont fait pression sur les gouvernements pour rendre la pasteurisation **obligatoire par la loi**. 😱Résultat : • Les petites fermes familiales ne pouvaient pas s’offrir ces machines • Le lait cru est devenu quasi illégal dans de nombreux États • Des centaines de petits producteurs ont été ruinés Ce n’était pas une question de santé publique. C’était une opération de capture du marché par une des familles les plus puissantes du monde. Aujourd’hui encore, dans de nombreux pays, vous n’avez pas le droit de boire du lait cru… mais vous avez le droit de boire des sodas ultra-transformés. Curieux, non ? Vous pensez vraiment que c’était pour « protéger » les consommateurs ?

#RappelProduit crème de sauge - Eclat de Vert Risques : Défaut de fabrication, défaut d'étanchéité (ex: micro fuites, thermoscellage défectueux) ou anomalies de conditionnement Motif : défaut de maîtrise des barèmes de pasteurisation rappel.conso.gouv.fr/fiche-r…

#RappelProduit Pesto de basilic - Eclat de Vert Risques : Défaut de fabrication, défaut d'étanchéité (ex: micro fuites, thermoscellage défectueux) ou anomalies de conditionnement Motif : Défaut de maîtrise des barèmes de pasteurisation rappel.conso.gouv.fr/fiche-r…

You are right. Apparently they started pasteurisation in the 1880s