Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Raphaël Glucksmann, quasi-candidat en quasi-campagne - PressReader news.google.com/rss/articles…

18
NEVER MISS THE DFA AGAIN FREE access Read on your phone, tablet or computer Easy page-flip newspaper experience Access to all 13 ACM newspapers DOWNLOAD NOW: Android: play.google.com/store/apps/d…... Apple: apps.apple.com/.../africa-co… PressReader: africacommunitymedia.pressre…
20
PRESSREADER Access here: libguides.dut.ac.za/az.php?a…
1
2
FIFA WORLD CUP Get updated about your favourite teams playing in the FIFA World Cup 2026 via PressReader. PressReader brings you coverage of sports, politics, lifestyle, technology & much more, all in one place. Access here: libguides.dut.ac.za/az.php?a…
7
We are still not allowed to exercise self defense against white people, for the most part. Here is the full documented list, era by era: --- **ERA 1: COLONIAL SLAVE CODES (1600s–1776)** **Virginia Slave Code, 1705** The foundation of American slavery law. The Virginia Slave Code of 1705 explicitly forbade enslaved people from resisting white people in any way. Any enslaved person who lifted a hand against a white person — even in self-defense — could be legally dismembered. [South Carolina Encyclopedia](scencyclopedia.org/sce/entri…) **South Carolina Slave Code, 1740** This is the one with the most chilling statutory language on record — verbatim: "If any slave who shall be out of the house or plantation where such slave shall live...shall refuse to submit or to undergo the examination of any white person, it shall be lawful for any such white person to pursue, apprehend and moderately correct such slave. And **if such slave shall assault and strike such white person, such slave may be lawfully killed.**" [HISTORY](history.com/articles/black-c…) Read that slowly. Any white person could stop, question, and beat any Black person outside their plantation. If that Black person struck back in self-defense — **legal execution on the spot.** No trial. No jury. No appeal. **North Carolina Slave Codes** Enslaved people could not leave the plantation without permission, could not buy or sell goods, could not visit white homes — and critically, **could not strike a white person even in self-defense.** [pressreader](pressreader.com/usa/chicago-…) --- **ERA 2: POST-CIVIL WAR BLACK CODES (1865–1866)** After the 13th Amendment, the South immediately rebuilt the same structure under new names: The Black Codes denied freed people the right to serve as witnesses against white people. Formerly enslaved people were forbidden to carry firearms, and they were not allowed to testify in court except in cases concerning other Black people. [National Museum of African American History & Culture](searchablemuseum.com/black-c…) The Black Codes prohibited freedpeople from "assembling themselves together, either in the day or night," making seditious speeches, disturbing the peace, using insulting language and gestures, and carrying weapons. [NCpedia](ncpedia.org/slave-codes) No weapons can't testify against a white person can't assemble = **legally defenseless by design.** --- **ERA 3: JIM CROW (1877–1965)** In Virginia there were seventy-one offenses that carried the death penalty for enslaved people but only imprisonment when committed by whites. Free Black people were forbidden to carry firearms, testify against a white person, or raise a hand against one even in self-defense. [HISTORY](history.com/articles/black-c…) The practical enforcement mechanism was the **all-white jury** — which meant even where no explicit law prohibited self-defense, a Black person who harmed a white person in self-defense could not get a fair trial because: - They couldn't testify against white people - White juries decided all outcomes - Acquittals of white-on-Black violence were routine --- **THE THROUGH LINE — For Your Post:** *"People want to know why Black Americans don't trust self-defense law. Here's why: From 1705 to 1965, it was literally codified law in America that a Black person could NOT strike a white person even in self-defense — and could be LEGALLY KILLED for doing so. South Carolina Slave Code, 1740. Virginia Slave Code, 1705. Post-Civil War Black Codes, 1865. Jim Crow through 1965.* *That's 260 years of written law.* *Karmelo Anthony got shoved at a track meet and got 35 years.* *They didn't change the rules. They just stopped writing them down."*
2
1
171
Ariana Grande à la Maison- Blanche : « N’utilisez jamais ma musique » - PressReader news.google.com/rss/articles…

1
12
Replying to @Knowing14557733
Big lie. Let's talk about who's actually dangerous to police — and who police treat as dangerous anyway. **The ADL documented it:** White supremacists and far-right extremists killed **51 police officers** over 30 years. Black nationalists and left-wing extremists combined? **11.** That's a **5-to-1 ratio** of white extremists killing cops. In 2017 specifically — Black nationalists killed **zero** officers. White extremists killed **three.** **Now flip it.** Black Americans are **2.9 to 3 times more likely** to be killed by police than white Americans — despite being 13% of the population. Black people were more likely to be killed by police, more likely to be **unarmed**, and less likely to be **threatening someone** when killed. [Policeviolencereport](policeviolencereport.org/) Black males are 6.1% of the total U.S. population but approximately **25% of all persons killed by law enforcement.** [Law Enforcement Epidemiology Project](policeepi.uic.edu/u-s-data-o…) So the group **least likely** to be killing cops gets killed by cops at **3 times the rate.** The group **most likely** to be killing cops gets the benefit of the doubt — every time. **And then the FBI?** While white supremacists were killing cops at 5 times the rate of Black extremists, the FBI created a formal "Black Identity Extremist" domestic terror designation — with **no equivalent category** for white extremists. Experts said the targeting was based less on evidence than on **politics.** [pressreader](pressreader.com/usa/houston-…) --- This isn't about who's more dangerous. The **data settled that.** This is about whose danger gets **surveilled** — and whose gets **a badge.** **#FBA #Reparations #Freedmen**
2
1
16
Ed Miliband lives in a multi-story, multi-million-pound terraced family townhouse in Dartmouth Park, Kentish Town in North London Ed Miliband: “My £2.7m home isn't a mansion” - The Telegraph. Known for his shrewd property choices and past controversies regarding his real estate investments, the details of his living situation include: •Property Value: His North London home has been previously valued at up to £2.7 million •The "Two Kitchens" Controversy: The house famously became the center of a media furore dubbed "kitchengate" after he was photographed in a smaller "kitchenette" Ed Miliband responds to 'two kitchens' media furore - BBC News. This led critics to suggest he had a second, much larger kitchen for family use, which Miliband maintained was intended for their live-in nanny Ed’s kitchen ‘for live-in nanny’ - PressReader. •Constituency Residence: In addition to his primary family home in London, he rents a constituency home in Doncaster to serve as his base for the Doncaster North area Ed Miliband's My London - Evening Standard. •Early Ownership: Miliband also previously held a fractional equity stake in a Victorian childhood home located in Edis Street, Primrose Hill, which was divided between him and his brother, David 'Red Ed' Miliband lives in £1.6m house after shrewd property moves - The Telegraph.
1
1
56
Every time a blade spins in the wind or the sun shines on a solar panel then somewhere a little blue flame burning expensive gas is extinguished. Reducing our reliance on expensive and often foreign imported gas.
12