here are my two cents fwiw
you’re either claiming a) the fact that AI was used to create the article makes it inferior to a purely human-written article, or b) that using AI without attribution makes the author less credible. both are instances of genetic fallacy—the virtue of a work should be evaluated on its own merits irregardless of its origin (so long as authorship isn’t intrinsic to the work’s meaning), and i believe the article itself is a worthwhile read
my point in making this tweet is that just because something is written by AI doesn’t make it necessarily inferior. i’m not making any claim to the merits of the author because that’s independent from the virtue of the article itself