Half the Monad team keeps tweeting that MegaETH must have paid Binance for the listing.
Not sure what they’re trying to prove, but it’s definitely not helping their own project.
Regardless of what’s true, it just makes you look like fools.
How about focusing on your own project?
MegaETH vs Monad (Context so far)
Timeline so far:
1. Zayn (Monad) asks publicly whether MegaETH has any agreement with Binance for the listing, or if it was a unilateral Binance decision.
2. Bread (MegaETH) replies (now-deleted tweet): roughly in these words "Binance bought MEGA on the open market."
3. James (Monad) follows up: "are you asserting that neither MEGA nor any person/entity associated with MEGA signed any legal contract with Binance?"
4. Shuyao (MegaETH) responds: "No MEGA has been provided as airdrop or marketing fees to CEXs for listing purposes. I had Bread delete his tweet because, as an ecosystem lead, he did not understand how asset listing works and misspoke."
5. James replies: it's possible Binance just woke up and listed MEGA out of goodwill, but that's extremely unlikely, it would set a bad precedent for future listings. More likely there's a side agreement giving Binance, its team, or its investors a way to make money via some other route.
6. Abdul (ex-Monad) digs into what MegaETH actually paid Binance in the QT
The unanswered question is, if not tokens, then what?