Sorry, but no. You don't get to decide who is a fan & who isn't. People can be critical of the owner, or be loyal to the owner, they're still fans of their club.
And to be honest, this is quite ironic when you spend a lot of time slating the Sacramento Kings ownership yourself.
Because you’re not a fan.
If you were you’d understand that the academy has been reinforced and was incredibly successful. Same with the women’s team, who we are very proud of.
The stadium has been acquired and a lot of other plans are now in place to further stabilize the club long term.
If you were objective, the vast majority of things have been invested in and improved, along with charitable endeavors, re-acquiring parts of the club history (medals, etc), finally getting a trophy made, and being the #1 family experience in the EFL.
It’s of course fair to say that the #1 goal, by far, is the first team, and that’s fallen short of where we ALL want it to be, though not through a lack of his investment.
If you approached things from a fair point of view, your issues with the first team would be taken as fair and valid, as others of course are.
But you’re not interested in that. You want to do potshots and memes and clown noses because, well, that’s you. And that’s your right.
But it’s not helpful. And it’s a bit sad.
And ultimately we WILL get there, and I can’t help but think when we do, a part of you will be disappointed, and you’ll find something else to be angry at.
If it’s attention you want, here ya go. It’s just too bad you’re not more interested in conversation, especially when you have a chairman that is readily accessible, for good and bad.