Your interfaces should adapt beautifully across all devices. 📱⌚️🕶️
Our new adaptive layout tools will make your app look stunning on every screen size. Plus, we’ve updated our layout principles and guidelines to help you design across desktop, mobile, watches, and even immersive XR experiences.
Read here: goo.gle/4o0nMLR
you gotta get this shovel or you'll be left behind. no you need to orchestrate dirt displacement. you should be soil-movement maxing! you gotta do scoops!
Our internal data shows Claude is accelerating AI development—a possible path to recursive self-improvement, or AI autonomously building a more capable successor.
It’s happening faster than we thought, and the implications deserve greater attention. anthropic.com/institute/recu…
guys, the chart I drew is really scary... I know I said six months ago the chart was scary but this one has huge implications. it could indicate that even scarier charts are on the horizon
Humanity, created by God in all its grandeur, is today facing a pivotal choice: either to construct a new Tower of Babel or to build the city in which God and humanity dwell together. In Jesus Christ, this humanity in its grandeur becomes the Way, the Truth and the Life, opening the path for each of us to grow toward fullness. #MagnificaHumanitasvatican.va/content/leo-xiv/e…
Jony Ive designing a car with Ferrari feels so old-school, in the sense that it represents a view of design as a specialty that can operate in all domains simultaneously. Like, cars are kind of the same shape as a magic mouse, I suppose.
PICARD: Data, shields up
DATA: Brilliant! Shields can reduce damage we sustain. Not immunity. Not hubris. Just prudence. It's not precaution—it's strategy.
[camera shakes]
WORF: HULL BREACHES ON NINE DECKS
DATA: Here's what happened: you told me to raise shields, and I didn't
The fact that no one on the left—and I mean *no one*—is even willing to *pretend* your stuffed animals’ feelings might be hurt when you don’t wish them goodnight, shows that we care far more about looking adult than confronting the issue
the tasteslop post clarified a detail of the current discourse for me: "moat" is deployed with as much frequency as "taste" but functions as a rhetorical support for the inevitability of tech. A moat is only relevant in the context of imminent incursion (or paranoia)
I mean the whole conversation right now is all over the place, because another key ingredient in the promotion of inevitability is "getting left behind," while forming a moat implies maintaining a static location and, presumably, your taste stays with you wherever you are.