PolyTrader Pro, a pro trading terminal for Polymarket, from founders of Insight Prediction

Joined May 2019
95 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
One of the nice features of PolyTraderPro is fat-finger protection. Anyone who has traded in prediction markets for an extended period of time has fat-fingered. We have at least one control on it, and more controls are on the way. In our settings, one can set a limit above which an additional "are you sure!?!" dialogue box pops up. In this case, for any trade over $30k, or 18% of my balance, I want additional confirmation. This feature can be toggled off.
3
3
11
1,988
Very excited to attend the Manifest conference this weekend. We will be presenting on Prediction market analytics...
2
1
5
394
Interestingly, in the data we pulled from Dune, the average wallet broke even on polymarket. Losses were a bit more concentrated than winners.
107
PolyTraderPro retweeted
šŸŽ² Odds of good conversations at Forecast & Coffee tomorrow: 99%. Odds of panels and long talks: 1%. Less than Jesus returning this year. If you're warming up for Manifest, the best prediction market conference, come help the first market resolve YES. Register ↓
šŸ“ˆ Manifest is this weekend. Will we see you there? Our internal market says 91% yes. Push it to 100%: we're co-hosting Forecast & Coffee with @precogmarkets and @seer_pm at The Hidden Cafe in Berkeley, the day before the conference kicks off. Resolve YES by registering ā–ø luma.com/3rwm2l1r
2
6
11
711
We are dropping another huge update in the next couple of days. Here are some of the new features: --Notifications for Clarifications and Proposals -- comes automatically for any market you are involved in --See an activity feed for makers (polymarket only provides takers) --For each trade can see your maker subsidy/taker fees broken out (you can't yet see this on polymarket) --Fixing several bugs
1
3
469
Here's a view of what the maker activity feed looks like for a market.
3
188
So, PolyTraderPro has now been updated to include taker fees and maker subsidy information! Note that this information, somewhat annoyingly, is still missing from Polymarket's UI itself.
1
1
341
PolyTraderPro retweeted
ā€œBacktesting suggests prediction markets have demonstrated a strong track record in forecasting electoral outcomes.ā€ VoteHub’s forecast includes Kalshi b/c Kalshi makes it better Their methodology shows that PredictIt & Kalshi were more accurate than poll-based forecasts
Wondering how the VoteHub forecast works? Here's a short blurb here and a link to our more detailed methodology statement below: votehub.com/wp-content/uploa…
4
16
2,068
Happy to note that PolyTrader Pro put out an updated version within hours of Polymarket's update yesterday!
4
4
204
PolyTraderPro retweeted
Apr 29
If you want to bet on this Clavicular market you need to: 1. Understand how to interpret vague rules 2. Know how similar Polymarkets have resolved in the past 3. Understand the complex resolution process 4. Argue in favor of your side in the UMA discord server 5. Understand how certain large UMA users such as UMArocks influence voting and market price 6. Understand that Polymarket might issue a clarification, and that this clarification might lead to a different outcome compared to UMA vote in the absence of a clarification 7. Know how the top UMA holders tend to vote 8. Track the votes 9. Understand the vote rolling process 10. Finally, you need to determine the fair value of the market based on everything listed above I think the system might be broken!
27
1
87
8,685
Note that PolyTraderPro is fully updated and ready for the Polymarket update tomorrow.
2
150
FYI, polymarket's site is currently experiencing problems. Our app is fine.
3
1
184
PolyTraderPro retweeted
It was great doing a podcast with Nathan after we’ve interacted so much online over the past 5 years. Check it out!
New Podcast! I interview @GaetenD (top-30 politics trader on @Kalshi) on the midterms and 2028. He thinks Rubio should be the Republican favourite and he doesn't rate Newsom, AOC or Harris as Democrat favourites. Youtube: youtube.com/watch?v=iC-mbO64…
2
13
1,599
Good news and bad news for PolyTrader Pro fans. The good news is that we've improved the product substantially. The bad news is that we've improved the product so much so quickly, that we are forced to raise the price. There will still be a free version without all the bells and whistles.
2
1
3
1,116
PolyTraderPro retweeted
Here is a great use of prediction markets. Effect of the Iran war on Republican's cratering odds in the senate.
3
2
12
1,653
Here at PolyTraderPro we have a wide range of new amazing features, including: (1) adding in counterparty information on all trades, (2) allowing you to buy shares by clicking on the orderbook (3) a new proprietary feature for fast-clickers. These are all included for the paid version only.
1
3
916
We'e recently made a lot of updates to PolyTraderPro.com. Now you can see market top holder information, comments, and activity. Counterparty information is up next!
2
677
PolyTraderPro retweeted
Feb 21
You asked if you missed anything: Yes - you used a lot of words - but didn't make the most important point: Judy N is free money.
This space was a really interesting view into the Judy Shelton Y and N holders’ reasoning. I’ll summarize the arguments (and counter arguments on both sides) TOP JUDY SHELTON Y ARGUMENTS: #1 Trump has not formally sent the Warsh nomination to Congress, and there’s no reason why this shouldn’t have happened yet (because the White House and Congress are close to one another) 2 Counterarguments from the N holders: A) The White House is waiting for Thom Tillis (R) to get off of the committee to advance his nomination as he has signaled opposition to Warsh because of the Fed investigation B) there is a government shutdown happening rn (though the counter argument is that Trump didn’t send this before the gov shutdown, and the shutdown wouldn’t impact this) #2 Judy Shelton is the pro-digital and crypto choice. Kevin Warsh is the establishment. With crypto in the tank rn, Trump could change his mind to the ā€œpro-tokenizationā€ candidate for Fed Chair to please crypto holders with the Midterms coming up 1 N counter argument: Judy Shelton is pro-gold standard which is different from being pro-crypto #3 Trump changes his mind often, so walking a nomination back would be unsurprising (especially when Kevin Warsh is in the Epstein Files) 1 N counter argument: Even if Trump does walk back Walsh, Judy Shelton is unlikely to be the next choice #4 Judy Shelton has been making cryptic statements and symbols (maybe Trump, too) that could suggest she is the dark-horse candidate. There was something about a Phoenix pin that I didn’t catch No real counterarguments here, as they were dismissed #5 XRP holders are YOLO’ing this. Many know it’s not likely to hit, but if it does, they will all be right and XRP will moon. No real counterarguments here #6 WHERE IS KEVIN WARSH? He hasn’t made any public statements on being nominated apparently This needs to be verified by N holders TOP JUDY SHELTON N ARGUMENTS 1) Trump has announced Kevin Warsh to be the nominee, and the delay on him sending the nomination is totally justified 1 Y counterargument: Trump does many unprecedented things, and there’s no real reason to delay this unless it signals something deeper 2) If Judy Shelton were actually a possibility to be Fed Chair, it would impact the traditional finance bond markets, and there’s been no movement there 1 Y counter argument: Prediction markets are the first moving signal and she is still priced at 5% which isn’t high 3) Trump would never nominate a woman to be Fed Chair because he is sexist 2 Y counterarguments: A) He’s nominated plenty of women to positions of power including Pam Bondi and Kristi Noem B) Trump would be ā€œowning the libsā€ by nominating a woman 4) Judy Shelton Y holders are not smart and just doing this on vibes Counterargument: Judy Shelton Y is a lot cheaper than N, and they are not expecting it to hit. They think it’s a good lottery ticket. 5) The price movement in favor of Judy Shelton Y is expected because of the time value of money in the prediction market ā€œbondā€ market because it’s unclear when when Trump will send the nomination to Congress. It’s not a real signal. Counterargument: The volume of money being added to the markets is significant and is in many cases a signal of the ā€œwisdom of crowdsā€ Let me know if I missed anything. It was an interesting conversation all around!
8
1
21
5,529
We just dropped a new update on PolyTraderPro. On the markets page, one can now scroll to and view "Top Holders".
1
2
541
The permissionless liquidity rewards sponsorship is a game changer for @polymarket! Very sharp one.
Feb 22
After being asked to be more transparent about app updates, @Polymarket has shipped/announced: - public PolyUS APIs - 5-minute crypto up/down markets - permissionless liquidity reward sponsorship - DomeAPI acquisition - updated matching engine Ivan explains how more this has been a longtime request of the community, and (at least for now) it seems like they are listening!
2
360