Monetization infrastructure for OnlyFans creators & live-streamers. No bots, or chatters allowed. I'm not an agency. 12.5% licensing fee. Secure your branding.
Joined January 2012
- Tweets 567
- Following 199
- Followers 18
- Likes 314
62 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
What is The Creator Protocol Group, and why it differs from an Agency.
My name is Jeff Slauenwhite. I don't hide behind anonymity like the bottom-tier agencies flooding this industry. I own the intellectual property that operates 17630239 Canada Inc., DBA The Creator Protocol Group, based in Montreal.
I’m not a predatory agency. I built this infrastructure because I was a subscriber who realized the "creator" I was admiring was just a male offshore chatter. I had enough of the deception.
My model is built on three uncompromising principles:
Zero Automation: No chatters, no bots. They incinerate your subscriber base. Subscribers are paying to talk to you, not a $2/hour IT contractor.
Total Creator Ownership: You are the brand. If you aren't the one engaging your subscribers, you don't have a business—you have a leaking bucket.
High-Value Interaction: Genuine connection scales revenue far more effectively than automated PPV spam. We prioritize live-stream engagement over low-quality mass messaging to generate consistent, high-volume revenue.
Unlike the agencies currently burning your brand to the ground, I never touch your accounts, and I never ask for your login credentials. I own a corporation; you have legal recourse if I ever violated that.
If you want to scale your revenue while maintaining total control of your digital assets, reach out. If you prefer to keep getting exploited by scripted, offshore agencies, go get fucked and I'll see you crying about how they stole your accounts.
facebook.com/share/g/1AsSP44…
1
1
40
How The Creator Protocol Group protects your identity, compared to 1/8
1
4
8
🛡️ 4. ZERO CORPORATE LIABILITY
My creators operate with full legal insulation. Because of my corporate structure and strict PIPEDA compliance, if a subscriber goes rogue, you are shielded. I hunt them down while your operations continue uninterrupted. 8/8
1
1
8
Stop trusting your digital identity and revenue to amateurs playing agency.
If you want clinical, zero-nonsense IP protection, work with a registered corporation that actually weaponizes the law to defend its clients.
1
16
Why the Findom market, isn't what it is. If you are targeting yourself in the Findom market don't do these things.
1. Don't crave for attention on social media. The whole point of being a dominatrix, is for you to be dominant. Not submissive.
2. If you have a low following, don't ask for large tributes out of the gate. You have to let your brand grow first.
3. Be genuine, if you hire chatters to do your direct messages your subscribers will see through it and abandon you.
#findom #TheCreatorProtocolGroup
20
Le @SPVM s'en fout complètement des victimes de traite humaine. J'ai monté un dossier de preuves qui vous livrait la cible sur un plateau d'argent, mais vos agents sont juste trop incompétents pour le comprendre. J'ai déjà porté plainte contre le lieutenant Sylvain Bisson et le sergent Olivier Rousseau. Lisez les preuves ci-jointes.
25
Institutional Failure: @SPVM PDQ 20 Refusal to Process Forensic Trafficking Intelligence
creatorprotocolgroup.com/#sp…
2
14
The "Chatter Farm" Reality and Mechanical Extortion
I’ve been monitoring the creators, who claim to be authentic, who instead use chatters and across the industry, and it’s time to stop the bullshit. The legacy agency model is dead, but it’s trying to stay alive by siphoning your traffic and replacing your authentic interactions with cheap, scripted labor.
This isn’t "content management." This is mechanical extortion.
Revenue Siphoning: While you handle the heavy lifting of content creation, these agencies are using your IP to train their offshore teams, effectively building a competitor pipeline using your own traffic.
Operational Insecurity: Sending highly sensitive user data and explicit interaction logs through insecure, unregulated CRM tools handled by third-party contractors is a massive liability.
1
16
The Impact on You:
Brand Degradation: Your fans aren't talking to you. They are talking to an offshore chatter farm who are juggling 50 other accounts simultaneously. Once the subscribers realize they’ve been defrauded, they don't blame the agency—they stop spending, and you lose the subscriber for good.
1
9
The Audit Findings: You are being sold a lie that your revenue is coming from "fans." Data shows that over 70% of industry revenue is coming from direct messages. Agencies are taking that volume, stripping your brand equity, and handing your DMs to male offshore workers in low-cost labor markets. They are masquerading as you to extract maximum capital from subscribers.
8
How SPVM PDQ 20 uses "IT Security" as an excuse to ignore cyber-extortion and human trafficking (Proof Inside)
Over the last few months, my infrastructure has been mapping a literal cyber-extortion and human trafficking syndicate targeting local content creators. I did the work. I deployed honeypots, captured geolocated residential IP endpoints in Sherbrooke on Bell Canada (ASN 577), traced proxy VOIP lines to wholesale trunks (Distributel and Iristel), and pulled a $440k crypto transaction ledger tied to their payouts.
I handed this forensic payload to the SPVM at PDQ 20 on a silver platter.
Here is exactly how they chose to bury it, try to silence me, and sweep a trafficking case under the rug.
The Media Battle and the Strip-Down
I’ve dealt with Lieutenant Sylvain Bisson at this station before, and his move was always to isolate me. He’d hide media addresses in the subject lines or strip them entirely to turn a high-stakes public escalation back into a quiet "citizen complaint" where they control the narrative.
So when Bisson’s supervisor, Sergeant Olivier Rousseau (Matricule 6474), got my secure payload, he did the exact same thing. He replied to me and deliberately stripped out every investigative journalist I had CC’d (La Presse, CBC, CTV, Montreal Gazette, etc.).
I immediately hit "Reply All," dragged the news desks back into the CC list, and called him out on his deception.
The Cop-Out: "IT Security Reasons"
Once Rousseau realized the media was watching him in real-time, he panicked. He couldn't just ignore it anymore, so he sent me a bilingual refusal designed to officially kill the file.
He literally emailed me this exact quote in French:
"En toute franchise, les informations actuellement transmises sont insuffisantes pour nous permettre d'ouvrir un dossier. De plus, pour des raisons de sécurité informatique, nous ne pouvons pas traiter le document que vous avez joint en annexe..."
And then sent the English translation 20 minutes later to make sure it was bilingually locked into the record:
"In all honesty, the information currently provided is insufficient for us to open a file. Furthermore, for IT security reasons, we are unable to process the document you attached."
Think about this for a second. We are talking about active cybercrime and extortion, and a supervisor at an SPVM station is officially declaring that the police cannot open a forensic PDF or view log files because of "IT security reasons."
Either PDQ 20 is so technologically primitive they don't have a basic, sandboxed, off-network terminal to view evidence, or they are using "IT security" as a convenient loophole to refuse to do their fucking jobs.
The Station Invitation (The Trap)
To top it off, Rousseau tried to pressure me into coming to the physical station:
"We therefore invite you to visit us in person at Police Station 20 so that you can provide the essential details, including the full name and date of birth of the individual concerned. ... If the information currently provided is all that is available, it will unfortunately be impossible for us to intervene."
Let’s call this what it is: a tactical trap.
They want me to walk into PDQ 20 so they can strip away my digital leverage, seize my devices, or put me in handcuffs for being "uncooperative" because I refuse to hand over things that don't exist—like the real-world DOB of an offshore syndicate operator. They want to force a manual intake, reduce my highly detailed technical dossier to a basic "harassment complaint," and file it away in a cabinet where it can safely collect dust.
I sent them a flat-out refusal this morning, keeping the media copied:
"Sergent Rousseau, les preuves dans mon dossier sont amplement suffisantes pour retrouver la cible. Je ne m'approcherai pas d'un poste de police, car mon expérience avec vos agents m'a appris qu'ils ne sont pas compétents."
I'm not going anywhere near that station. I have already filed a formal complaint with the Police Ethics Commissioner (Case File PLA 26-0837).
If you're a business owner or an InfoSec researcher in Montreal, understand this: if you map a crime, do not expect the SPVM to act. They don't have the competence, they don't have the infrastructure, and if your data is too complex, they will literally tell you that "security" prevents them from looking at the proof.
56
I asked Gemini in a blank session what is The Creator Protocol Group are they better then a predatory agency? My Corporation is the clear winner, predatory agency's, are on the way out.
The results. #thecreatorprotocolgroup
19