#1 rated psychoanalysis actualist in the world
Joined September 2024
- Tweets 21,974
- Following 495
- Followers 295
- Likes 51,514
Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
12 Oct 2025
1
9
2,756
That Thing retweeted
"90% support it"
Yeah in the same way dictators "win" elections - its a made up stat; the survey was publicly available and there was NO way to say no lol
People will attack this policy, but after extensive government consultation, 90% of the parents of under-16s support it. They have watched social media consume huge portions of their children’s lives, so have a very different perspective.
Social media amplifies narcissism, materialism, envy and division at an age when young minds are still developing. It keeps children trapped in a digital ecosystem designed to maximise engagement at the expense of real-world experiences, time outdoors, hobbies, independence, and learning how to socialise and build genuine friendships.
Perhaps most damaging of all, it encourages constant comparison. Children are measuring themselves against carefully curated versions of other people’s lives every hour of every day. It creates feelings of inadequacy and anxiety on a scale that older generations simply never experienced.
There will be much outrage about this, but this policy is truly about protecting children, and anyone who cares about the future of society should support it.
Community note
Said consultation didn't have an option for those who don't support it, only five different versions of yes and "don't know"
x.com/i/status/20665…
91
3,151
27,354
479,495
That Thing retweeted
Jun 15
Intersex implies “between sexes.”
Such a scenario does not exist—a misnomer. There are rare sex development disorders that impact males or females, however.
And I’ve devoted the last 9 years to studying that research, writing two books, producing an animated series, and more.
11
100
910
13,763
That Thing retweeted
Jun 14
There is no such thing as intersex. There are rare people with congenital sex development disorders—something you don’t have.
Changing your secondary sex characteristics with cross-sex hormones does not change your sex. It merely causes symptoms that mimic an endocrine disorder.
Jun 14
We redevelop ourselves as male or female. So it's really not a slam dunk like you think.
The actual thing you're looking for is this: You are male or female based on how society has coercively gendered you. Intersex people can be trans. Actually, all trans people are intersex.
30
249
1,601
28,026
That Thing retweeted
Jun 13
1. The immune suppressants needed to keep your transplanted uterus from killing you would endanger the unborn child.
2.
Jun 11
To all the transphobic people out there.. You realize Trans woman are woman right? Why can't people be themselves? Why does it pain you to know trans woman exist? Im a proud woman
Thats who I'll always be. You are getting mad over representation in a video game. The fortnite community is truly diabolical
This is gonna be a bit touchy but it's been something I've been thinking for awhile... to you transphobes I want to bring up is
you do realize technology evolves?. In the coming decades transgender woman will be able to get pregnant? What will be the difference between a trans woman and a woman then? There will be none!! other then they used to be a dude now they are a woman!
Trans rights are human rights! We will not be oppressed!!
🏳️⚧️
96
301
8,003
786,246
That Thing retweeted
Jun 12
Conservatives are mad because hormones change your sex?
48
45
288
9,485
Jun 12
Coward blocked me after this one
Funny stuff
Jun 12
Yes they do
And a defect condition isn't an excuse for every Tom Dick and Harry to claim womanhood
1
1
33
That Thing retweeted
Jun 12
You literally can't read.
This is the study you guys cite but never actually properly read the results.
Their brain was closer to a typical male brain than to a typical female brain. The OPPOSITE of what you claimed.
5
23
663
5,517
That Thing retweeted
Jun 11
All males have a small amount of mammary tissue. If you give large enough doses of estrogen to a male, that tissue will grow, but it's not making him female, because we don't define sex by whether you have tits or not.
Ever wonder why we're called mammals?
1
2
145
4,167
That Thing retweeted
This whole line of reasoning is just a massive motte and bailey. That it is possible for a person to be born with sexual chromosomes other than XX or XY does not demonstrate that it is possible for a man to become a woman. Just as the fact that it is possible for a human to be born with downs syndrome (47 instead of 46 chromosomes) doesn't demonstrate that someone can become someone with downs syndrome, or a banana (33 chromosomes) or anything else.
Good job, you know BASIC biology. Now learn ADVANCED biology and watch how quickly your argument falls apart.
Youre offended by transgender people existing because youre uneducated
13
17
331
6,934
That Thing retweeted
Jun 9
Nah mate
Indoctrination works when you manage to convince a young boy he is a girl, thus cause him to lob off his florida and pump himself with drugs and surgeries, rename himself georgia, and force himself into women's bathrooms and private areas
He should be locked up in the looney bin but instead, he is celebrated in todays society because of "trans" rights.
THIS IS WHY WE NEED THE GOSPEL OF JESUS CHRIST
Jun 8
15
4
28
1,137
That Thing retweeted
Jun 7
Fetuses are not children.
11
63
609
That Thing retweeted
Jun 6
And this is why transgender-friendly social media platforms like Reddit have effectively banned the word “groomer” from their sites.
Trøøns will outright admit they actively recruit new members for the cult. They actually brag about the number of “eggs” they’ve “cracked.”
1
5
58
1,068
Not only do they not become women
But they are not, nor ever will be, women
2
22
That Thing retweeted
🏳️⚧️ The sexual offending rates of trans-identifying men are:
385% more than normal men
63,767% more than women 🤯
117
1,168
3,721
74,936
That Thing retweeted
Dems be like “it’s OK to kill disabled people before they’re born“ and then be like “trans people are born that way“.
🤔
2
5
33
367
That Thing retweeted
No. Their male cells can't even use estrogen to fight off a virus.
1
6
179
7,959
That Thing retweeted
Jun 2
Noahs Ark isnt a “logical nightmare” ur objection is just a shallow gotcha that ignores both the text and basic science.
The flood wasnt a calm swimming pool of saltwater sitting still for a year.
It was a violent, earth shattering global catastrophe with massive tectonic activity, volcanic eruptions and huge sediment flows.
The water wasnt purely “ocean saltwater” the entire time.
Many plants survive flooding far better than skeptics admit:
- Seeds can remain dormant and viable in soil for LONG periods.
- Many species float and survive in brackish water.
- Vegetative propagation allows rapid regrowth.
- Post flood…..the earth was repopulated from the arks cargo and surviving root systems/seeds.
The Bible says the waters receded and the ground dried and God Himself declared after the flood that “seedtime and harvest” would continue (Gen 8:22).
And it did….the earth recovered.
Youre welcome to mock it but pretending “lol saltwater killed all plants” is some knockout blow just shows u havent thought past surface level skepticism.
The real nightmare is believing everything came from nothing, exploded into perfect order and eventually turned ancient tadpoles into philosophers by pure blind chance…but sure thats perfectly logical.👌
Jun 1
Noah's Ark is a Logical Nightmare 😅
We must assume that the salt water that covered the earth for over one year did not kill the plants.🤭
Funny how that is never discussed.
49
32
652
45,312
That Thing retweeted
Jun 1
Here’s a handy chart because you seem confused. Please study it and understand it and realize that male people can’t have a “woman” identity any more than a “hen” identity. Words have meanings.
1
5
90