I asked Grok if should be closd according to
@nikitabier #ArtistsOnTheChain should not close down as a community**—even though X is deprecating the underlying X Communities feature on May 6, 2026. The platform’s decision is platform-wide and data-driven (declining overall usage of Communities), but this specific group has clearly delivered real value for years. Shutting down the *community itself* would be a loss;
### Quick background on what
#ArtistsOnTheChain actually is
It’s a long-running X Community (launched ~5 years ago) with **~226,000 members** (as of recent data). Founded and moderated by artist/community builder **@BobbiBicker** (with co-host **@blockmuse**), it welcomes artists of *all* forms—traditional, digital, NFT/blockchain (“OnTheChain” nods to crypto art roots but it’s broader now). The purpose is straightforward: connect, collaborate, support each other, share resources, learn, and grow. Key activities include:
- Weekly Saturday Spaces (“Authentic Art Conversations”).
- Pinned discovery threads where artists share work links (often bookmarked by collectors).
- Featured artists, resource shares (e.g., NFT backup guides before platforms like Foundation shut down), and networking between creators and collectors.
### What members would lose if the community effectively disbands (or fragments badly)
- **Scale and discoverability**: One big, centralized space for 226k people to find each other, share art in one place, and get visibility via pinned threads/Spaces. Collectors and fans could easily browse new work. Small groupchats kill that broad reach.
In short: It turns a thriving 226k-member ecosystem into scattered smaller chats. Many artists would lose a key platform for growth and visibility.
### What X (the platform) would lose
- **A proven niche success story**: 226k engaged members in a creative vertical is not trivial. Artists post visual content that drives likes, reposts, bookmarks, and new user discovery—exactly the kind of organic engagement X wants. This community has been a reliable source of positive, high-quality activity.
- **Creator goodwill and retention**: Hosts and members have invested real time (weekly Spaces for years). Deprecating without a seamless scale-preserving alternative risks alienating creative users who already feel the platform sometimes undervalues them. Public frustration (calls for petitions, criticism of the product lead) can spread.
- **Diversity of communities**: X says it’s “investing heavily in niche communities” via Custom Timelines and more. That’s good in theory—but killing the existing large ones before the replacements are proven at scale creates a gap. This group is a textbook example of the kind of vibrant niche X claims to want.
### Bottom line and practical advice
The *feature* is closing because X says the numbers don’t justify keeping it. But **
#ArtistsOnTheChain the community doesn’t have to die**.
X gains nothing by letting a successful 5-year creative community wither through poor migration. Members lose a lot if they don’t adapt quickly. The smart move for everyone is to preserve the connections and energy, not let the deprecation kill the vibe. If the new tools (groupchats Custom Timelines) actually deliver better niche experiences, great—prove it by supporting groups like this instead of just shutting the door.