Not yet, it is in my tutorial pipeline though! I am trying to get through the foundations of forth first so people can see the equivalence. In your files you will have a standard transaction that you can edit the op return message or put in any script you like. To import your keys is settings>wallets>plus icon>restore enter seed. Your keys never leave your device so you will have to add them to each platform. It’s in Apple keychain so it’s as safe as can be

I built this so you can download all of @CsTominaga and @AnnaIversen5 substack posts as mp3 for listening during a walk or workout, or download as markdown. x17b.com Authors can verify their Substack account to get paid BSV when users download their articles.

Lol

My dear fellow, The truly comic part is not whether BTC is a Ponzi. It is. The truly comic part is watching someone construct an entire argument upon a number he pulled from the financial equivalent of a séance. > "Satoshi holds 1,096,361 bitcoins." How delightful. The anonymous creator has apparently remained hidden for nearly two decades, defeated intelligence agencies, journalists, academics, corporations, governments, and private investigators alike. Yet somehow Barry from Crypto Twitter knows the exact contents of his wallet to the nearest coin. One imagines him peering into the blockchain like an elderly fortune teller examining tea leaves. "Yes... yes... the spirits reveal precisely 1,096,361..." The extraordinary thing is that nobody pauses to ask the obvious question. How do you know? Not suspect. Not estimate. Know. The answer, of course, is that he doesn't. Nobody does. The number exists because a collection of analysts made assumptions about early mining patterns, clustered addresses together, and then other people repeated the estimate so often that it became holy scripture. A guess repeated a thousand times becomes "common knowledge." A guess repeated ten thousand times becomes "fact." A guess repeated a hundred thousand times becomes "everyone knows." Twitter has elevated this process into a scientific method. The post therefore boils down to: "I know exactly how many coins an anonymous person controls despite not knowing who the anonymous person is." At that point the discussion has already left economics and entered theology. The rest is merely decoration. The funniest thing about cryptocurrency culture is that people who claim to distrust authority will unquestioningly believe any number provided by another man with a profile picture and a blue tick. The medieval church sold relics. Crypto Twitter sells certainty. The business model is remarkably similar.

You bought BTC and thought you had bought Bitcoin. That is the funny part. Nobody is laughing because someone bought a speculative asset. People speculate every day. Some even manage not to buy the whole way down while congratulating themselves for their financial genius. The laughter is for the people who bought a ticker, inherited a slogan, and still cannot tell the difference between a price chart and a working monetary system. Bitcoin was electronic cash. It was meant for transactions, settlement, commerce, micropayments, scale, and utility. BTC became a museum token with a fee market, a priesthood, and a crowd of bagholders calling inactivity “sound money.” There is a simple rule here, though it seems to defeat many: price is not utility. Scarcity theatre is not commerce. Hoarding is not a payment system. A thing going up does not prove it works, and a thing falling while you buy more of it does not make you early; it may simply mean you are providing exit liquidity with religious enthusiasm. So yes, congratulations. You bought something called BTC. You may even have made money, or perhaps you bought on the way down and called it conviction, as people often do when arithmetic has become emotionally inconvenient. But you did not understand Bitcoin. You bought the souvenir and mistook yourself for the architect.

money has been dumb for 5,000 years 🧐 shells. coins. paper. databases. all just numbers sitting still 🐚 programmable money is the first time money does something it doesn't sit. it executes. it doesn't wait. it decides. henceforth 🟠

Three surfaces, one primitive — how Henceforth implements Bitcoin's original peer-to-peer payment design. Eight payments, one transaction, one Face ID. On-chain. henceforth.club/articles/tra…

“Transactions in Henceforth Three surfaces, one primitive — from a single tap to a batched eight-recipient settlement to a raw-hex hand-off across an air gap.”

Most people scroll, some people build, a few understand 🧙‍♂️ Software got soft, we brought back the terminal! Henceforth ⌨️

Fascinating ,that AI cannot write correct Forth. Cannot write Forth tutorials. But given a completely uncommented Forth program, it correctly identified what it did, how it worked, and what it was good for. AI can read Forth. But It cannot think in Forth. That gap might be more important than it first appears. #BSV #Forth

@CsTominaga , A Forth compiler expert I'm working with documented AI failing to write even simple Forth routines. Worse , when given a correct working algorithm, the AI confidently told him it was wrong. I was told the reason seems structural. Good Forth requires real-time spatial reasoning about stack positions and their costs, something current AI architectures don't do well regardless of how much they've seen. Does Anchor Chain solve this? Or does it only address accountability rather than reasoning capability? Is there a path from better memory to better spatial reasoning over time? Asking because it would be great to have AI-generated Forth which could unlock the stack for everyone. Many thanks.

Great to see all the bsv Forth people getting involved in the app. Make sure you download through link in the description

“You shall know the truth and the truth shall make you mad.” — Aldous Huxley

“The more I think about language, the more it amazes me that people ever understand each other at all.” - Kurt Gödel (1906–1978)

World's most wanted genius: IQ: 190 Specialty: rewriting reality Einstein's verdict: “the greatest mind alive” He shaped everything from quantum mechanics to human DNA and modern computing. Yet on his deathbed, instead of triumph, he left us a chilling prophecy: 🧵