There's only one body. Knowledge is on the up, kings are not. Stupid questions = good questions

Joined August 2025
126 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
Online Privacy Guide v1.0 Digital privacy is for everyone, that includes your neighbor, your mother, your mates. It needs to be easy to understand, show clear progress and be achievable in little snippets. jaquesbody.github.io/onlinep… 1/4
5
4
22
3,185
jaquesbody retweeted
Don’t take it from me. Take it from one of the internet’s greatest pioneers @jimmy_wales
6
208
525
9,727
jaquesbody retweeted
For some reason what children want to do is seen as antithetical to them having a childhood. Actually it is the determining trait of mainstream views about childhood; preventing children from doing what they want.
We are banning social media access for under 16s. These days kids must find their feet in a world where technology intrudes into every area of their life. I just can’t let that go on anymore. So we’re giving children their childhoods back.
Community note
The UK Government's 'careful review' of the research found a small correlation between children's use of social media and wellbeing, but no evidence of a causal effect: gov.uk/government/pub… assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/696e0b46…
3
5
31
3,100
jaquesbody retweeted
Buy Pixel with cash. Install @GrapheneOS . Instantly render @Keir_Starmer 's tin pot authoritarianism utterly ineffective. Easily access Tiktok with your VPN location set to a free and democratic jurisdiction. Simples.
🚨 NEW: The UK's social media ban for under-16s is set to be enforced at device-level, with Apple and Google forced to verify the age of all users
15
62
464
29,963
jaquesbody retweeted
UK ‘public consultation’ on the social media ban notice how they didn’t give the option to say no? Illusion of democracy.
46
455
2,377
27,929
jaquesbody retweeted
There's no way to ban under 16s without age verifying everyone, which means ID checks or face scans to log on for every adult in the country. Thats the actual prize here, ID locking the whole internet and ending anonymity, and "for the children" is just the trojan horse to sell it. Parents can already keep their kids off social media, they dont need a surveillance state to do it for them.
We are banning social media access for under 16s. These days kids must find their feet in a world where technology intrudes into every area of their life. I just can’t let that go on anymore. So we’re giving children their childhoods back.
Community note
The UK Government's 'careful review' of the research found a small correlation between children's use of social media and wellbeing, but no evidence of a causal effect: gov.uk/government/pub… assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/696e0b46…
7
16
60
3,007
jaquesbody retweeted
"Don’t trust a man who needs an income—except if it is minimum wage." - Nassim Nicholas Taleb in The Bed of Procrustes
2
23
2,272
This, every day of the school year. It's shocking.
My daughter had PE today. They were given a choice: volleyball, basketball, “walk and talk”, and a few other things. Me: “What did you choose?” Her: “Walk and talk, obviously.” Me: “And how was it?” Her: “Horrible. We had to walk in a square. We weren’t allowed to change direction or make up games with a ball.” So basically: they were allowed to choose fun, as long as no fun happened. And now we’re told banning social media is about “giving children their childhood back.” Maybe start by letting kids have fun — instead of adults deciding what fun is allowed to look like. Lest they enjoy themselves. God forbid.
7
When will we see the results of the ban, that's why you're doing this right? When will the kids be safe? When will they have glowing mental health? Improved grades? Better socializing skills? Better manners? Greater attention spans? When?
We are banning social media access for under 16s. These days kids must find their feet in a world where technology intrudes into every area of their life. I just can’t let that go on anymore. So we’re giving children their childhoods back.
Community note
The UK Government's 'careful review' of the research found a small correlation between children's use of social media and wellbeing, but no evidence of a causal effect: gov.uk/government/pub… assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/696e0b46…
6
jaquesbody retweeted
I was always a shy introvert. Social media helped me find friends, people who share my interests. Damn, I can use this app to speak with people like @DavidDeutschOxf, @naval, @LynAldenContact and many others. Puting aside the surveillance argument, this is just sad for kids.
We are banning social media access for under 16s. These days kids must find their feet in a world where technology intrudes into every area of their life. I just can’t let that go on anymore. So we’re giving children their childhoods back.
Community note
The UK Government's 'careful review' of the research found a small correlation between children's use of social media and wellbeing, but no evidence of a causal effect: gov.uk/government/pub… assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/696e0b46…
3
6
34
2,832
jaquesbody retweeted
Parental agency, evidence-based defaults, and minimal surveillance are all possible without resorting to dystopian surveillance states. That the tools already exist begs the question, why don't they use them instead? But we know the answer already.
This is the nettle for conservatives to grasp on the social media ban IMO. Yes, it's the job of parents. But what do you do when, on an unprecedented scale, swathes of parents don't do their job and the ill effects spill over into the rest of society?
1
1
60
jaquesbody retweeted
if you don't want to be totally surveilled and controlled, you are a poopy face.
If you're an adult raging on X about the ban on social media for under-16 kids, then you need your hard drive checked.
Community note
Opposition to the UK's under-16 social media policy stems from documented concerns over mandatory age verification, privacy risks, and enforcement inconsistencies, per official briefings and consultations. commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief… gov.uk/government/con…
5
86
3,757
jaquesbody retweeted
It’s important to know that the social media ban for under 16s is not a ban for under 16s. It is a ban on *selected* social media for EVERYONE. Until you identify yourself.
751
4,181
22,845
10,660,972
jaquesbody retweeted
Most of our problems are caused by politicians trying to come up with solutions to earlier problems that they themselves had created. ⬇️
24
61
569
13,124
jaquesbody retweeted
Nothing to do with digotal ID rollout I guess. Do people still fall for this stuff.?
We are banning social media access for under 16s. These days kids must find their feet in a world where technology intrudes into every area of their life. I just can’t let that go on anymore. So we’re giving children their childhoods back.
Community note
The UK Government's 'careful review' of the research found a small correlation between children's use of social media and wellbeing, but no evidence of a causal effect: gov.uk/government/pub… assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/696e0b46…
38
44
297
42,903
jaquesbody retweeted
Age verification is the Trojan horse for complete control of the internet. Imagine you'd have to register your identity to read a newspaper. That's what this is about. They say it's for the children, but it really is about taking away your right to use the web anonymously.
JUST IN: UK Government clarifies adults will still be able to use social media by verifying their identities with digital IDs, facial recognition, passports and credit cards.
13
55
234
7,614
jaquesbody retweeted
13h
this is much, much, much worse than it sounds there's an argument for social media being bad for children but this should be up to the parents to modulate, not bureaucrats who think they own you to enforce this, you have to enforce collecting personal information of i) children (which is insane) but also ii) literally everyone since you cant distinguish age beforehand which means mandatory state surveillance for absolutely everyone now combine that with new AI cybersecurity and unstructured data capabilities and you get both: i) more draconian and complicated controls and profiling by the state for a LIFETIME and ii) your personal information almost certainly being hacked and leaked to thousands of criminals. that is children's sensitive information getting in the hands of bad guys at internet scale privacy in crypto is not enough, but if done right, it is crucial, as it can spearhead advancing tech like FHE and ZK while also helping fund new privacy projects in all sectors private capital and money is upstream of the resistance everyone will need
We are banning social media access for under 16s. These days kids must find their feet in a world where technology intrudes into every area of their life. I just can’t let that go on anymore. So we’re giving children their childhoods back.
Community note
The UK Government's 'careful review' of the research found a small correlation between children's use of social media and wellbeing, but no evidence of a causal effect: gov.uk/government/pub… assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/696e0b46…
81
47
433
34,905
jaquesbody retweeted
nothing to do with "stopping under 16s". everything to do with total surveillance of everybody.
5
118
2,935
jaquesbody retweeted
today, we’re one step closer
13 Jul 2024
Nostr serves as the credible backup plan for when governments seize or ban X.
14
51
1,409
jaquesbody retweeted
Children of the UK! Follow these steps and you won't have to care about what any w**ker politician thinks you should do ever again. Refuse to go to school Learn how to use a VPN Set up a Nostr profile Learn how to use Bitcoin and start accepting it Do this and you'll be fine.
15
57
343
7,288