This is a brave Jess. I don't envy your generation of parents in what's become a Wild West - all American - let's place the blame where it lies. The US should have already dealt with this problem.
These conversations won't be easy but must happen - in my case with grandchildren under their parents' rules.
@YouTube. It needs to address content, adverts shown and end scrolling before it's ever likely to be fit for unsupervised child use, especially not on a TV.
Until then, the SM corporations' united failure to act, while it simply reflects every new technology market entrant pushing at boundaries to gain advantage, is unacceptable. Tories failed for years to set a policy boundary. Labour's going to have to come back to
@LibDems policy for staging access, so your daughter learns, is safe at every new step and capable of knowing the things to avoid when the restraining limits come off for her as an adult.
In the meantime, commercial respect needs SM corporations to stop business related searches returning pictures of scantily clad women and recreational ads. It's always disrespectful to women. Then we all need simple controls in what we need to be able to designate as safe work and family space.
Enforcement is expensive. The Tory solution was not to bother, so we've rivers are full of silt from fields and sewage released by delinquent water companies under licence if you please!
With farmers we have 'pull' schemes to show how to retain and enhance the soil needed to avoid stranding farm assets in less than a generation.
For water and SM correlations pull hasn't worked so 'push' is overdue. We've given these corporations and their less scrupulous users, access to our data and they've royally abused us and our children, so we must stop them and retain use of the best of their technology safely under our new rules.
There's an interim stage that's not been done here in the UK, the EU has been better.
That's where fines can and should be extracted to hurt the SM companies enough to make investors call for change. Those fines will either need to be in excess of 100% of profits in a year to matter to those investors and C-Suites, or accompanied by banning directors - making the individual Executives calling these society harming shots to risking their job and any future senior management role.
We can go further and should consider a stop for companies operating in the UK when their company standards fall outside UK law and the management team does not meet the Companies Acts Director standards here. Palantir should face this today in the debate about to be brought by
@LaylaMoran as no UK government should let that company within 3000 miles of UK cutizens' data.
These represent pressure points we need government to push towards, so bans can be changed to age appropriate and restricted safe bands once the rules are implemented.
I concede the Liberal data point made by several people here is hard to swallow. I don't have the answers to that yet. Perhaps you do?
Some tricky conversations this evening about the impending social media ban.
‘I don’t even know who this government guy is’
‘Keir Starmer’
‘Keir Starmer, what does that mean’