I've stayed quiet long enough. In 2022, I produced an FBI Whistleblower video at @TPUSA alongside @charliekirk11. To this day, it remains TPUSA's most-watched video on Rumble. We even won a Gold Telly Award in 2023 for it. But nearly 20 minutes in, Former FBI Agent John Guandolo says something that to this day still haunts me: "If you don't think the FBI is monitoring you, or considering monitoring your executive leaders, even you yourself — then you haven't been listening to me." Charlie was building something dangerous to the regime. Not politicians, the intelligence agencies that actually move this country. A real anti-establishment movement that genuinely threatened them. And then, they executed him in broad daylight, and blast the video of it across the internet. But only after they used him to get their man into office, and secure more wealth and power for themselves. And now, the very same people who have pretended to mourn him, are hijacking his name to push the exact establishment garbage he spent his life fighting against. That's not legacy. That's a hostile takeover wearing his face. The grift has gotten too big to ignore. And I'm done pretending I don't see it. I didn't give 10 years of my life, building a movement alongside one of the best men this nation has ever had, to watch the best chance we had at saving this country be hijacked by the exact same people it was built to uproot. Watch the full video here: rumble.com/v1lil91-fbi-whist…

1🧵Do you know how much your State sends to Israel annually? In 2023 the US signed a MOU w/Israel to guarantee $3.8 Billion in Federal aid per year til 2028, but how much does each of the 50 States pay 🇮🇱annually?💰

You may be wondering 2 things. 1) What happened to Trump? Who is he listening to? 2) Why does it feel like the internet isn’t real and engagement is fluctuating based on “particular topics” lately? I think I can help answer both questions. There is a company called Vine & Fig Tree (VFT). VFT is a pro-Israel organization with ties to the administration. Earlier this year, VFT was at the White House meeting with Sebastian Gorka. Shortly after that White House meeting, I was contacted through a third party and asked to script-write for VFT. The individual who contacted me is publicly very Christian and widely perceived as America First. I was told the script would be used to create an AI-generated video on behalf of the White House, specifically for NSC and Sebastian Gorka. They told me: “Yeah we have to do this on behalf of them [the administration] because they don’t want it to look like it’s actually coming from the WH.. you know what I mean? I mean, it worked out for them and Nick Shirley.” I was then given a Dropbox link containing research, polling data, internal comments, and strategy material compiled by VFT and the third party involved. Inside the Dropbox were 7 folders. Through those documents, I learned more about what this organization actually does. Their reports monitor major conservative and "dissident-right" accounts and frequently frame those accounts as vulnerable to, or participating in, foreign influence operations. The reports include information regarding @NickFuentes, @hodgetwins, @RealCandaceO, @TuckerCarlson, @jacksonhinklle, @IanCarrollShow, and @MarioNawfal just to name a few. They also collected polling and response data surrounding @joekent16jan19’s resignation from the administration. In another report, they argue that distrust surrounding Charlie Kirk’s assassination was mostly due to Americans falling for Russian, Iranian, and Pakistani propaganda networks. In that same Charlie Kirk report they state, "This represents an urgent national security threat... and demands a whole-of-government response on par with cyberattacks or terrorism." The internal comments attached to these reports are what stood out most. They talk about "going after" Fuentes, stating "undermining his Christian identity is probably a good Idea." They contemplate "getting" @MattWalshBlog or @michaeljknowles to publish on behalf of VFT. They suggest collaborating with NCRI, founded by Joel Finkelstein - a multi-million dollar organization that tracks "hate speech" on social media. Another internal comment weighs in on how they will advise politicians based on their data which also compiles info surrounding JD Vance's 2028 run: “There is definitely a way to use this in our favor: tell politicians that there are two wings of the party, they don’t overlap, the majority lies here, and this is where you should be if you want to get re-elected..." The documents also discuss: Burner profiles, burner ad accounts, AI-generated interview-style videos, audience personas, “troll content briefs”, engagement testing, and ideological audience segmentation. If you're wondering whether the White House is actually listening to VFT... It's worth reviewing the White House's latest 16-page Counterterrorism Strategy touted by Gorka. More to follow.

Fitting day to rewatch this one

God bless Thomas Massie. He walks out of this with his honor intact. He’s a patriot & kept his integrity. As long as the voters give their votes to whoever can run the most ads we will have politicians who are purchased by foreign governments & corporate interests.

It is time for the United States Postal Service to ban junk mail. Unsolicited spam calls are already prohibited by the FCC. Emails are heavily regulated by the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003. Junk mail is the majority of mail, 100 million trees per year. Enough!

In less than four days, our Moneybomb has reached $847,950 thanks to thousands of patriots across the country. Soon we will buy the final tv ads & mail pieces for the last week of the campaign. massiemoneybomb.com is still live and these donations are critical. Thank you!

Humans come in all shapes and sizes. Some are intelligent, some are stupid and some are genuinely malicious. People disagree about politics, religion, morality, and almost everything else, but there is one principle every sane person should understand: when someone is being attacked from every direction, especially by people they never attacked in the first place, you should at least stop and ask why? What is going on here? If I punch someone in the face and they punch me back, the responsibility starts with me because I initiated the conflict. That is simple cause and effect. But if random groups of people suddenly start attacking me when I never attacked them in the first place and their only justification is that I questioned an organization or its leadership because I believe they are not being fully honest then any rational person should immediately start asking questions. Why are these people so emotionally invested? Are they ideologically driven, financially motivated, coordinated behind the scenes, or simply acting in the interests of the same network of people? Otherwise, why would they aggressively attack someone who never attacked them personally? Especially in a country where personal conflict is avoided like the plague and passive-aggressiveness is in fashion. Why would they deliberately seek out personal conflict when they seemingly have no dog in the fight? That is basic logic. So why is Candace Owens being attacked by people she never attacked? Even someone with minimal common sense should be asking that question. And this is after she was fired, her friend was killed and somehow she’s the one attacked for what exactly? Having a show in which she asks questions most Americans would like to ask the leadership of this country? Is that what triggers these people? The answer is - YES! They are triggered by people who ask difficult questions. Why would a popular host like her, someone Americans genuinely enjoy listening to and support (a fact based on numbers), be attacked by a handful of weird individuals in a very coordinated manner? Popularity and public support are measured by numbers, and numbers usually reflect one important metric: honesty! Ben Shapiro learned that the hard way. So why is it that a host who is so obviously supported by the public still gets relentlessly attacked by certain people? Their excuse is always the same: “Erika Kirk was attacked, so now we’re attacking Candace.” Suddenly the same people who excuse corruption, hypocrisy, defend genocide in Gaza and institutional failure at every opportunity have discovered a moral conscience overnight. Now they present themselves as noble defenders of justice and protectors of Erika Kirk. Amazing! Candace Owens apparently performs miracles. She somehow transformed some of the worlds’ most cynical and self-interested people into passionate warriors for morality and for this widow Erika! People who would normally destroy others for the sake of self-preservation and have done so before, are suddenly deeply concerned about someone else’s well-being. Or maybe the explanation is far simpler: these people are connected, coordinated, and protecting the same interests behind the scenes, the same entrenched elites. That explanation makes far more sense doesn't it? Let’s be clear about something important: Candace Owens did not accuse anyone of murder. She asked questions and tried to connect the dots when nothing made sense. That is all. And I have to say she is much nicer than I am. If someone murder my best friend and then some group of people started attacking me for wanting to find out what happened to my friend - asking questions and connecting the dots would be the least of their worries. I'm not as nice as Candace. Candace Owens never accused Brian Harpole of killing Charlie Kirk, at least not to my knowledge, yet Brian Harpole is suing her for defamation. Defamation means making false statements that damage someone’s reputation. Brian Are you sure it was Candace who damaged your reputation? Or maybe it had something to do with your shortcomings when the person you were protecting was killed? Maybe that’s when people started seeing you as an incompetent ass? So where/what exactly was the false statement Candace made? Asking whether security failed at an event where the person being protected ended up dead is that the statement? That can not possibly be ground for defamation, it is a completely reasonable question because security failed Charlie is dead!!! What was Brian Harpole’s job? His job was to protect Charlie Kirk. Was Charlie Kirk protected that day? No. Charlie Kirk is dead. You f***g moron you and entire team miserably failed at your jobs that is why Charlie is dead. That is not an opinion. That is an undeniable fact the guy you were supposed to protect is dead! Or maybe we are missing something and you were not tasked with Charlie's protection at all? Maybe you were there to dance ballet before the event even started. I don’t know, am I missing something here? please educate us! If the person you were assigned to protect dies under your watch, then the security failed. PERIOD! That failure may not mean murder, but he is dead because of the failure! That is true in every country, every language, and every functioning reality! And this is where the lawsuit becomes absurd. A man whose protection team failed and got Charlie killed is now suing a podcaster because she questioned whether security at the event was handled properly. Think about how irrational that is. Brian, if you ever wanted to restore credibility or be taken seriously again professionally, as a body guard the correct action would have been very different. You should have gone on Shawn Ryan’s show and apologized to the American people and to Charlie’s family for the failures in security detail that day. That is what accountability looks like. Instead, you chose lawsuits and public attacks. And now, rather than being remembered as someone who took responsibility after a tragedy, you will be remembered as the bodyguard who failed at his job and then sued one of Charlie’s friends for questioning it. That is the legacy you are creating for yourself.

Hey Frank. A Marvel Television Special Presentation: The Punisher: One Last Kill premieres May 12, only on Disney .