O NO!!!!!Daddy is going to China .
These creators (likely the "negative influencers" referenced, such as Marc Nixon, Jasmin Laine, Mario Zelaya, The Pleb, and others in the group) are generally conservative-leaning Canadian commentators critical of Liberal PM Mark Carney's (often spelled Marc in some contexts) outreach to China.ba2c75632cc2
They view his Beijing visit (around mid-January 2026) and related deals as naive, risky, or a dangerous pivot away from the US toward the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), prioritizing trade over security, human rights, and strategic alignment with allies. Their commentary frames it as kowtowing, enabling authoritarianism, or harming Canadian interests.009111
Key Themes from Their Reactions:
Security and Interference Risks: Criticism of hidden agreements (e.g., police/intelligence sharing with China) and allowing Chinese EVs (seen as "spy machines" due to potential backdoors/subsidies). They accuse the government of hypocrisy while claiming to fight foreign interference.c06a1cdac48b
Betraying Allies for a "New World Order": Portraying Carney as choosing China over the US (e.g., amid Trump tariffs), pursuing a strategic partnership or "new world order" with Beijing instead of securing tariff-free deals with Canada’s top trading partner. Clips highlight Carney’s comments on China’s demand/capital vs. values mismatches.a9ade97c2b1c
Human Rights, Values, and Naivety: Highlighting the CCP’s censorship, human rights abuses, state control, and history of interference. They argue cozying up weakens Canada and ignores past tensions (e.g., canola tariffs, Huawei, etc.).0e73ee
Economic Skepticism: Doubting quick wins or real benefits; viewing deals as one-sided, with China gaining leverage (e.g., EVs for canola access) while Canada risks dependency or propaganda wins for Beijing. Some tie it to broader Liberal failures or Carney’s past/business ties.7c046d
Specific Examples:
Marc Nixon (
@MarcNixon24): Posted videos and commentary calling out contradictions (e.g., Carney previously labeling Beijing a threat), "spy machines," secret policing pacts, and choosing China over the US. One post: "Pierre Poilievre wants a tariff free deal with the U.S. Mark Carney wants the New World Order with China."0f80d686ab1e
Jasmin Laine (
@JasminLaine_): Covered Carney’s China partnership critically in videos/podcasts, questioned non-binding deals and trust issues with China, and amplified concerns about the "new world order" framing and media spin.984a5c02a6ca
Mario Zelaya and others (e.g., The Pleb): Similar angles on investment risks, tariff drops on Chinese goods, and diplomatic shortcomings.0316fc
This fits their broader style as anti-establishment/Liberal critics focused on "common sense," sovereignty, and skepticism of globalist or CCP engagement. Mainstream coverage of the trip was more neutral/pragmatic (ice-breaking trade/diplomacy), but these creators emphasize the downsides.79d62a Their content often uses clips, memes, and direct commentary to rally audiences against it. For the latest, check their X/YouTube channels directly, as reactions evolve with new developments.