Software Engineer | Tech Enthusiast | Chelsea FC 💙 | Lets talk Tech, Startups & AI

Joined June 2021
45 Photos and videos
Unpopular opinion: Most developers don't know the honest difference between developers using AI and developers being used by AI Let's break it down: - Using AI = you understand the output, you review it, you catch the bugs - Being used by AI = you copy-paste without reading, ship without testing, don't understand what broke - Real stat: AI code has 1.7x more bugs on average - The bottleneck isn't generation speed, it's judgment speed - What separates senior devs in 2026 is not who writes more code, it's who reviews better. The tool is neutral. The operator isn't. Are you using AI or AI is using you??
2
9
kclich  retweeted
Replying to @kclich
good list. one add: Supabase Auth handles who logs in, not who can read what. auth on its own still lets any logged-in user pull other users' rows unless RLS is enabled per table. easy to assume the first covers the second. it doesn't.
1
1
16
Free tools I use to run my SaaS without breaking the bank - Analytics: Plausible free tier / Google Analytics - Error tracking: Sentry free tier - Email: Resend (3,000 emails/month free) - Auth: Supabase Auth (free to start) - Uptime: UptimeRobot (free) - Forms: Tally (free)/ Docs - SEO: Google Search Console (free)/ Bing webmasters - Payments: Stripe (pay per transaction, no monthly fee) - CMS: Notion as a backend (free) - Deployment: Railway / Render free tier You don't need $500/month in SaaS tools to launch. You need clarity on what you're building.
3
3
76
kclich  retweeted
Replying to @kclich
Started with coding curiosity wanted faster debugging and explanation
1
1
1
25
kclich  retweeted
Websites you’ll actually use (and wish you knew earlier) 👀 Temp Mail Disposable emails for quick signups and testing. Down For Everyone Or Just Me Check if a site is down or it’s just your connection. Wayback Machine View old versions of websites and deleted pages. BuiltWith See what technologies any website is using. JustWatch Find where any movie or series is streaming. Temp Number services (e.g. TextNow, Sonetel) Get virtual numbers for verification and testing. CamelCamelCamel Amazon price tracking history (real discount checker). Cloudflare Radar See internet traffic trends, outages, and global insights. Wappalyzer Instantly detect tech stack of any website (browser extension). Have I Been Pwned Check if your email was leaked in a data breach. Remove dot bg Instant background removal for images. Photopea Free browser-based Photoshop alternative. Regex101 Test and debug regex patterns instantly. JSON Formatter (jsonformatter dot org) Clean and debug JSON quickly. Carbon Turn code into beautiful shareable images. Excalidraw Simple online whiteboard for diagrams and system design. What are you using daily that’s missing here? 👇
2
1
2
151
kclich  retweeted
Replying to @kclich
Add one for the privacy side: OSINT yourself. Run your old usernames through a footprint check your email through haveibeenpwned. Most people are stunned what's still public - forgotten accounts, breach hits, photo metadata. Best 10 min of digital hygiene there is.
1
1
1
42
kclich  retweeted
Things that used to rank on Google. And the exact moment they stopped working. A thread for anyone still doing SEO the 2015 way 👇 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ WHAT USED TO WORK (AND IS NOW ACTIVELY HURTING YOU) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 1/ KEYWORD STUFFING The old play: mention your keyword 47 times in a 500-word article. Google counts mentions. More mentions = more relevance. What actually happened: Google got smarter. Then it got embarrassed by what it used to reward. Now it reads context, not frequency. One naturally placed keyword in a well-written article outranks a keyword-stuffed page every single time. If your content reads weird to a human, it reads weird to Google too. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 2/ EXACT MATCH DOMAINS bestcheaplaptops2009 dot com buyloansonlineuganda dot com affordablewebdesignnairobi dot com These used to rank purely because the domain matched the search term. Google patched this in 2012 with the EMD update. Then patched it harder. Then kept patching it. In 2026, an exact match domain with weak content is a red flag, not a ranking signal. Your brand name as a domain beats a keyword domain with no authority every time. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 3/ GUEST POSTS FROM LINK FARMS "We'll publish your article on 50 DA websites for $30." This was a cheat code. Then it became an open secret. Then Google started penalizing it. The problem was never guest posting. Guest posting on real sites with real audiences still works today. The problem was fake sites built specifically to sell links — thin content, no real traffic, five different industries on one domain. Google trained a classifier specifically for this. It now devalues links from sites that exist purely to sell links. The link is technically there. The value is not. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 4/ THIN 300-WORD ARTICLES "Just publish content every day." "Volume is the strategy." "Any content is better than no content." So people published 300-word articles that said nothing, answered nothing, and helped nobody. Google's Helpful Content Update (and every update after it) was built specifically to kill this. The question Google asks now is brutal: "Would someone bookmark this? Share it? Come back to this site because of it?" If the answer is no, the page does not rank. It might not even get indexed. 300 words can rank. But only if those 300 words are the most direct, useful answer to a specific question that exists on the internet. Most thin content is not that. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 5/ PRIVATE BLOG NETWORKS (PBNs) The play: buy expired domains with existing authority, fill them with fake content, and use them to link to your money site. At peak, this worked shockingly well. The problem with deception at scale is that it leaves patterns. Same hosting. Same IP ranges. Same writing style. Same interlinking structure. Google got very good at detecting networks. The penalty for a manual action on a PBN is not a ranking drop. It is removal. And because PBN links are hard to disavow completely, the damage can last years. The ROI calculation on PBNs in 2026 is: high cost, high risk, declining returns, no long-term asset. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 6/ BUYING LINKS IN BULK "500 backlinks for $99." The same logic as PBNs, just less organized. Fiverr gig links. Directory spam. Forum profile links. Blog comment links. These used to move rankings. Now they trigger spam filters. Google has a link spam algorithm running continuously. It does not need to manually review your site to devalue junk links. The links get discounted automatically. Worst case, a pattern of spammy links triggers a manual penalty. Best case, you paid $99 for nothing. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 7/ META KEYWORD TAGS <meta name="keywords" content="best loans Uganda, fast loans Kampala, cheap loans online"> Google publicly confirmed in 2009 that it ignores the meta keywords tag. 2009. People were still adding meta keywords in 2023. Some still do it today. It has never helped. Not once. Not since 2009. The only tag that matters is meta description — and even that is for click-through rate, not rankings. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ WHAT ACTUALLY WORKS IN 2026 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 1/ TOPICAL AUTHORITY Google no longer ranks individual pages in isolation. It ranks websites that demonstrate deep expertise on a subject. One great article is not enough. You need a cluster — a pillar page, supporting articles, internal links connecting them, all covering one topic from every angle. A site that has published 30 articles on loan management software ranks higher for loan management software keywords than a site that has one great article and nothing else. Depth beats breadth. Consistency beats spikes. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 2/ AI-CITED CONTENT This is the new frontier and most people are completely ignoring it. ChatGPT. Perplexity. Gemini. Claude. People are asking AI tools questions instead of Googling them. When AI tools answer questions, they cite sources. Those citations drive traffic. To get cited: — Write direct, definitive answers — Use FAQ sections with clear Q&A structure — Include original data and statistics — Use proper schema markup — Be the clearest explanation of your topic that exists on the internet AI search and Google search are converging. Optimize for both or get left behind by both. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 3/ REAL BRAND MENTIONS When real publications mention your brand name — even without a link — Google registers it as a trust signal. This is called an unlinked brand mention, and it carries weight. The implication is significant: Getting mentioned on TechCrunch without a link is more valuable than getting a link from a fake blog nobody reads. Build something worth mentioning. Get into conversations people are having. PR is SEO now. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 4/ ORIGINAL DATA AND RESEARCH If you publish a statistic that exists nowhere else, every article that references that statistic has to link to you. This is one of the most powerful link-building strategies that is still dramatically underused. Survey your users. Analyze your own product data. Run a study. Compile research that does not exist in one place yet. Original data earns links passively, compounds over time, and establishes authority that no amount of keyword optimization can fake. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 5/ E-E-A-T SIGNALS Experience. Expertise. Authoritativeness. Trust. Google introduced E-A-T. Then added the first E for Experience because AI content was flooding the internet. The question Google is now trying to answer about every piece of content: "Was this written by someone who actually knows this subject from experience, or was it generated by a machine trained on other people's experience?" How you prove E-E-A-T: — Author bios with real credentials — First-person experience in the content — Original screenshots, examples, case studies — Citations from recognized sources — A track record of accurate, updated content — Real about pages with real people AI can write the content. But the experience signal has to be human. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ THE PATTERN ACROSS EVERYTHING Every tactic that stopped working had the same flaw: It was optimizing for the algorithm instead of the reader. Every tactic that works in 2026 has the same foundation: It makes the internet genuinely more useful. Google has spent 15 years trying to make those two things the same target. In 2026, they mostly are. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ SEO didn't die. Shortcuts did. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Which of these are you still seeing people do in 2026? Drop it below — the comments on this one are going to be interesting 👇
1
3
85
kclich  retweeted

1
1
38
kclich  retweeted
Make sure every week atleast you save 100k....by the end of the year ,you will be a billionaire 🤝
36
17
135
3,664
If i save my life everyweek, who will i be?😅 because that's all i can save
Make sure every week atleast you save 100k....by the end of the year ,you will be a billionaire 🤝
12
kclich  retweeted
When did you first use AI, and what made you decide to try it? Curiosity, work, school, coding, content creation, or something else? 👇
14
16
18
387
kclich  retweeted
Question for today! Be honest would you choose your parents again in another lifetime?
20
19
27
764
kclich  retweeted
The reason why CHINA 🇨🇳 was banned from participating in World Cup tournaments for 100 years ❌
33
130
215
23,897
kclich  retweeted
Did you know?🧠 Both a giraffe and a human being have 9 (cervical) neck bones. Where do you think a giraffe's neck is longer?
12
15
23
799
kclich  retweeted
How’s your Saturday going? 😋
65
58
115
1,739
kclich  retweeted
🇵🇹 Cristiano Ronaldo arrives for the World Cup: We are at this World Cup with a lot of hope and excitement. When I talk of the greatest player,I mean this one🥰🥰 Team Portugal when it comes to your TL just repost and we show him love #CristianoRonaldo #portugal #WorldCup2026
20
23
37
472
kclich  retweeted
Will these other couples reconcile like this one here or???
Which couple was the best for you??
19
23
29
931