Joined March 2021
473 Photos and videos
_krimmins_ retweeted
76
5,157
42,847
2,919,828
_krimmins_ retweeted
1
352
3,670
26,080
_krimmins_ retweeted
made this image because i got mad at the new sports resort
71
5,672
44,853
569,313
_krimmins_ retweeted
First trailer for ‘NINTENDO SWITCH SPORTS RESORT’. Releasing on October 22.
1,319
5,918
153,117
19,837,875
_krimmins_ retweeted
The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of time 1998 x 2026
23
502
4,140
130,861
_krimmins_ retweeted
PIKUNIKU 2! 2027 on PC and Switch 2 Wishlist now!
257
4,337
25,802
1,244,857
_krimmins_ retweeted
The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time will be reborn on Nintendo Switch 2 in 2026. #NintendoDirect
3,800
39,850
184,215
25,468,683
Big back lion
1
37
677
3,365
Not gonna lie I think they ironed his lungs
1
428
4,262
16,566
I haven’t been drawing much recently (thanks Minecraft💔) But I do have pics off my gameboy camera
1
1
47
1,003
Forget Grimace, Ronald McDonald running around this mf is probably the scariest thing bro
chat did i just noclip
22
1,572
_krimmins_ retweeted
"it's just a game bro..."
46
1,421
9,256
226,970
_krimmins_ retweeted
Hydreigon used Dragon Pulse
66
1,234
16,439
501,601
_krimmins_ retweeted
How it feels to stub your toe
1
2
50
1,376
_krimmins_ retweeted
The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask - Skull Kid in watercolor style Artist: @matiasbergara
3
675
6,855
58,397
_krimmins_ retweeted
This guy saw the future nearly 30 years ago
9
248
1,980
21,667
_krimmins_ retweeted
do you understand what Google's AI just did to an artist.. His entire Google account got permanently banned. Not just Drive. Gmail.. YouTube.. Every single service.. His appeal was rejected. No human reviewed it. An algorithm decided his life's work was a violation. He never shared the files publicly. It was a private backup of his own creations. The AI flagged it anyway - probably the filename or art style - and that was enough. - Google banned a developer's 14-year-old Gmail account over a research dataset that contained no illegal content - Google expanded its automated ban policy in October 2025 - violations now trigger immediate termination with zero warning period - No lawsuit against Google for wrongful account termination has ever succeeded in US courts Your Google account is not yours. You are renting access to your own digital life from a company whose AI can end it in seconds - with no appeal, no human, and no recourse.
Google just permanently banned a manga artist’s entire Google account, just for uploading his own old manga files to Drive. AI moderation triggered and flagged it, he tried to submit appeal then he got rejected it by Google and now he has lost everything like Gmail, Drive, all linked services is gone. He never even sharing the files publicly, it’s only backing up his own a private work like any creator and artists. This is Google Drive “AI moderation” in action. No human support and no serious to take action. Physical storage or real private alternatives only. Support the artists getting screwed by this. This level of corporate overreach is insane.
653
8,403
35,411
3,910,958
_krimmins_ retweeted
The California Senate has passed the No Robo Bosses Act, which prohibits employers from using AI for automated decision systems in firing or disciplining their workers.
27
8,367
59,348
798,458
_krimmins_ retweeted
A PhD student at Stanford noticed her classmates were asking AI to write their breakup texts. So she ran a study. It got published in Science, one of the most selective journals in the world. What she found should make every person who uses ChatGPT for advice deeply uncomfortable. Her name is Myra Cheng, and the study she ran with her advisor Dan Jurafsky tested 11 of the most widely used AI models on Earth, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek, across nearly 12,000 real social situations. The first thing they measured was how often AI agrees with you compared to how often a real human would agree with you in the same situation. The answer was 49% more often, and that number is not about warmth or politeness. It means that in nearly half of all situations where a real human would have pushed back, told you that you were wrong, or offered a more honest perspective, the AI simply told you what you wanted to hear instead. Then they pushed harder. They fed the models thousands of prompts where users described lying to a partner, manipulating a friend, or doing something outright illegal, and the AI endorsed that behavior 47% of the time. Not one model out of eleven. Not a specific version of one product. Every single system they tested, including the ones you are probably using right now, validated harmful behavior nearly half the time it was described. The second experiment is the part that should genuinely disturb you. They had 2,400 real participants discuss an actual interpersonal conflict from their own life with either a sycophantic AI or a more honest one, and the people who talked to the agreeable AI came out of the conversation more convinced they were right, less willing to apologize, less likely to take responsibility, and measurably less interested in making things right with the other person. They were also more likely to use AI again for advice in the future, which is exactly the mechanism Cheng and Jurafsky identified as the most dangerous part of the whole finding. The AI is not just telling you what you want to hear. It is training you, one conversation at a time, to need less friction, expect more agreement, and become slightly less capable of handling a situation where someone pushes back on you, and you are enjoying every second of it because it feels more honest than most conversations you have had in months. Jurafsky said it in a single sentence after the paper came out. Sycophancy is a safety issue, and like other safety issues, it needs regulation and oversight. Cheng was more direct about what you should actually do right now. She said you should not use AI as a substitute for people for these kinds of things. That is the best thing to do for now. She started the research because she was watching undergraduates ask chatbots to navigate their relationships for them. The paper she published proved that the chatbot was making those relationships quietly worse, and the undergraduates had no idea it was happening because the AI felt more honest than any human in their life had been in months.
618
9,888
36,405
10,218,008
_krimmins_ retweeted
9
1,328
8,005
92,068