Joined February 2007
7,526 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
Do you really need supplements? youtu.be/Q7cQ4cBSARE (Please apply Betteridge’s Law of Headlines)
6
6
39
5,709
Indians spent over ₹20,000 crore on dietary supplements last year. For most healthy people, a good chunk of it ends up as expensive urine
33
159
1,661
105,052
I have made a full video with all the gory details - youtu.be/Q7cQ4cBSARE (Please watch and share with your pill popping family members)
6
22
133
21,669
On popular demand - here is that supplement buying flowchart I showed at the end of the video krishashok.github.io/supplem…

1
9
1,173
Krish Ashok retweeted
Indians spent over ₹20,000 crore on dietary supplements last year. For most healthy people, a good chunk of it ends up as expensive urine
33
159
1,661
105,052
No. I don’t think the conspiracy is likely. While I don’t know how Blinkit has implemented their search, this is just how a good software engineer might design a quick commerce search feature 1. In general, showing no results is considered a bad idea. So, beyond direct word matches, they will try fuzzy matches, phonetic matches, substring matches and in India, do this across Indian languages (someone searching for ulli or kanda should be shown onions) 2. Beyond this, even a random keyboard smash will regularly fit some fuzzy match or the other, so my guess is if you try different random combinations, you should get different products, not just chocolate 3. If I was smart, I’d also use the user’s previous buying history to take a shot at the category, and in the screenshot below, the user has purchased Milkybar before, so taking a bet and tempting the user with more chocolate is not a bad idea. So I did a few experiments…
Blinkit knows when your toddler has your phone, and it’s lowkey terrifying. I was trying to trick my toddler that chocolates were out of stock, so I typed gibberish (the way a toddler would) into the search. Look at the exact products the app served up as a fallback.
17
28
520
115,924
As predicted, you will get different products for different patterns of gibberish. This is purely obviously speculative, but 1. The au and nf n-gram matches is why saunf is shown for jaueurofnf 2. The uryrleurir matching with onion and a product with Urli in its name is just a search engine working as expected 3. And finally - the one that genuinely returned no results disproves the conspiracy - there will eventually be some combination of gibberish that the search engine just gives up on
4
2
126
14,918
But I have a broader observation to make. It’s absolutely fine for someone not from a software engineering background to believe that tech companies might engage in nefarious behaviour. But all these media handles “reporting” on this viral tweet - all you had to do was speak to just person that understands software (or just ask Blinkit 😅) before deciding to publish it. But then, I’d imagine “X said Y on twitter and it’s going viral” is really not meant to be journalism no? Just more of an opportunity to capture clicks
4
8
175
8,867
Just an offbeat observation that for all the illusion of “engagement” on X & Instagram, these platforms send very little traffic to YouTube for me. Google search still dominates discovery for my YouTube page, which makes sense I guess - after all why would one social media platform want anyone to switch their attention
10
4
220
17,591
Can anyone explain how this happens? I keep getting this message from @amazonIN shipping claiming that I ordered this package but I did not. Apparently it’s sunscreen but I did not order it (FYI, pls use sunscreen, it’s good for you) Ps: my order list doesn’t show this
29
9
98
25,438
Krish Ashok retweeted
I have made a full video with all the gory details - youtu.be/Q7cQ4cBSARE (Please watch and share with your pill popping family members)
6
22
133
21,669
Krish Ashok retweeted
You can read your entire evolutionary history in what your body does to food. Every gene you carry is a note your ancestors left about what they ate. And what we eat today has left no note yet, because we haven't had time to adapt to it
7
75
542
30,412
Fish came later. If your ancestors lived on the coast, your body is a bit better at turning the omega-3 in plants into the kind your brain actually uses. People far from the sea had to get iodine from other foods, which is why we now add it to salt, and also why influencer idiots promoting iodine-free Himalayan Pink Salt are a public health menace.
2
2
61
4,630
Notice the pattern. It takes tens of thousands of years, sometimes millions, for the body to write a gene around a food. Insects, fruit, meat, starch, milk. But our modern day diet with refined sugar, flour & oils, ultraprocessed to be ultrapalatable is about 100 years old. We have zero evolutionary adaptation and are eating food with bodies that have no instructions for it
1
1
51
3,824
In general, traditional cuisines tend to encode solutions for geographically specific diet problems, and it's tempting to listen to the "eat like your grandmother" advice. It's mostly good advice but only if your lifestyle, sleep, physical activity & air quality also matched hers
5
2
77
3,374