Det er bare å legge til F til LHBTQIA . Fraysexual er det nye nå. vice.com/en/article/introduc…

Instead of fighting to decriminalise male homosexuality, the TQIA legacy organisations with huge amounts of donor money prefer to get straight men into women's toilets.

When they say ‘LGBT ’ they only mean the T

Au!!! Fabian Stang liker ikke Prideferingen lenger. Den hittil høyt respekterte Stang har altså stukket hånden i et vepsebol. Jeg regner med at bortforklaringene og alderismen går varme i Høyre akkurat nå. nettavisen.no/norsk-debatt/f…

The Norwegian Children's Ombudsman needs to explain why they are using the .

Sexualitet handler ikke om inkludering. Sexualitet er ekskluderende. Homofile menn ekskluderer kvinner fra sitt sexliv. Lesbiske ekskluderer menn. Heterofile tiltrekkes av motsatt kjønn og ekskluderer sitt eget. an.no/pride-styrken-i-inklud…

Hva står " " for i LHBT ?Offentlige etater foretrekker ofte LHBT fordi pluss-tegnet allerede er ment å inkludere queer, interkjønn, aseksuelle og andre grupper. Hvem er disse andre gruppene?

As a ‘vintage’ gay man in his early 50s who was integrally involved with the campaign for equality, in NO WAY do I feel we ‘are next’. That’s is a lie told by trans activists. They have nothing to do with LGB people but only seek to subvert our previous hard won social acceptance for their own ends.

Kanskje @NRKno bør revurdere hvordan de dekker disse sakene? Nå ser det jo ut til at selv storebror BBC har begynt å se annerledes på dette saksfeltet.

Når en homofil mann selv må påpeke at Pride-historien blir omskrevet, faller anklagene om hat og ekstremisme flat. Stonewall var et opprør mot politiet, ikke en transledet bevegelse. I Norge startet kampen på 1950-tallet med homofile og lesbiske. Likevel lar FRI den reviderte versjonen stå, der transpersoner fremstilles som de opprinnelige frontkjemperne. Når selv de som tilhører miljøet må rette på historien, viser det hvor langt revisjonismen har gått.

Det komiske i Pride-tiden: Pride sies å ha startet med Stonewall i 1969 med svarte transkvinner. Men Stonewall var et opprør mot politiet, og ingen svarte transkvinner var der. I Norge startet kampen på 1950-tallet, drevet av lesbiske og homofile, det tok 60 år. FRI tier om det.

Woman who claims to not be a woman gladly accepts award only for women. Make it make sense.

Det er vel dette som gjør meg skikkelig homo. Min favoritt Grand Prix sang EVER er Portugal 1982! ❤️ 1982 Portugal: Doce - Bem Bom (13th place at Eurovision Song Contest in ... youtu.be/woVEHK7V-Ds?is=L2Zh… via @YouTube

De som fikk gjennomslag for konverteringsloven i Norge visste at med forbudet deltok de i å transe homofile, all den tid psykiatere ikke får lov å undersøke den mentale helsa til pasienten. Det er rett og slett groteskt. Hør hva som sies i videoen.

Sjelden jeg er enig med Christine Jentoft, men her er vi sannelig det.

Trans folk skal ha de samme rettighetene som alle så lenge de ikke tramper over andres rettigheter. Men bøkene på denne lista fra UB er utrolig. Skeiv litteratur anbefalt: bare om gender. Heldigvis har jeg fått Tonje Gjevjon sin bok med flere bøker. ub.uio.no/om/aktuelle-saker/…

June is a month most people anticipate for various reasons, it heralding the Isle of Wight Festival, the Summer Solstice and Wimbledon. It's also a time many of us have come to dread, it being the occasion in which Pride Month is foisted upon a compliant and increasingly resentful population. What began in San Francisco in 1981 as simply the International Lesbian and Gay Freedom Day Parade has evolved into an entire month of worldwide celebrations chiefly dedicated to the trans movement, and at the expense of actual gay people. This metamorphosis can be seen by the original, simple Rainbow Flag having been supplanted by the chevroned, omnicause standard of the Progress Pride Flag. ✍️ Patrick West Article | spectator.com/article/the-ty…

This, and I cannot stress this enough, is real.

UB anbefaler skeiv litteratur. Faglitteraturen som anbefales er et skremmende eksempel på hvordan ‘queer theory’ har fullstendig tatt over innen akademia. ub.uio.no/om/aktuelle-saker/…

Another woman's job is being threatened over her gender critical views. This time, Agnes Wold in Sweden. Agnes Wold is a much-loved public intellectual in Sweden who is known for her feminism, her level-headed response to the COVID lockdown hysteria (she’s a bacteriologist), and, more recently, for refusing to go along with the transgender dogma that has gripped Swedish bureaucratic, activist, media and political elites. On 20 May, the Swedish parliament approved an amendment to the law that criminalises “psychological violence” and “coercion” relating to “gender identity or gender expression (such as conversion practices)”, among other things. It is widely understood to be Sweden’s version of a conversion therapy ban (a more explicit law is likely if the left coalition gets into power in September). Speaking on a radio programme about the law, Wold told the host that she would take 4 years in prison— the penalty for trying to prevent someone from leaning into their opposite-sex, delusion — before she would allow the gender transition of a grandchild (hard agree). This comment set off major drama, with one famous gay media guy calling her the Swedish equivalent to “old hag” or “old crone”. Specifically, he said “get rid of the old hag. It is unethical of Sveriges Radio to give her access to a microphone,” which is a way of saying she should be fired from her public radio job. Many, many people have called for Agnes Wold to be fired throughout the trans-mania era, and a lot of them seemed to be hoping that this comment would be the final nail in her coffin. But the remarks seem to have the opposite effect. Not only did Swedish people get very offended by this little shithead calling their beloved based radio-granny an old hag, they started to ask questions about the law that she was criticising. And that, boys and girls, is how the omerta on the trans mass derangement got partially lifted in Sweden, and suddenly everyone started to ask: wait, what? Some kids think they’re in the wrong body and you can go to jail for telling them to snap out of it? Yes, dear Swedes, that’s what’s happening. Welcome to the conversation. We’ve been expecting you. As of writing, Wold still has not yet been fired.