If the Bible is the "Word of God," all I can say is God needed an editor. Why are there two versions of Genesis? What, God couldn't make up His mind on which version He preferred and so He decided to just throw both of them at his creation and let them sort it out?
A person will ask "How did something come from nothing?" in an attempt to impugn atheists for not thinking. But it's *believers*, the theists, who aren't thinking. The question to ask is plain as day: Where did God get the stuff to create the Universe? Out of nothing, apparently.
We have the arguments. There are TONS AND TONS AND TONS of documented evidence. Published. Peer reviewed.
YOU need arguments. Evidence. YOU need to be able to falsify evolution. Without that you can't "dismantle" a fucking thing.
(Creationist pseudoscience won't work)
"God" is wholly dependent on language, because the only "evidence" we have for the supposed existence of any God is comprised solely of words—words that make claims about God and words that describe alleged "spiritual encounters" with God. We'd have no gods if we had no language.
If you believe God, you're a theist.
If you follow God, you're a disciple.
If you defend God, you're an apologist.
If you promote God, you're an evangelist.
If you truly understand "God", you're an atheist.
Hey, everybody! Well, mainly Christians. I have a quiz for you! It involves only one question. You can answer it within twenty seconds. Tell me how you did! medium.com/@lyonsnyc/a-quiz-…