Associate Professor of International Law and National Security, University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Law
Joined March 2010
- Tweets 2,067
- Following 400
- Followers 1,598
- Likes 346
139 Photos and videos
Marc Schack retweeted
#SouthSudan
Worsening food insecurity and malnutrition in South Sudan demand urgent action to protect lives and livelihoods.
More on the latest IPC findings⬇️
@theIPCinfo
7
7
354
Apr 27
Interesting. And contrary to the Danish case on weapons exports (F-35 parts), we’ll get a decision on the merits - eventually.
Apr 27
As Germany's Foreign Minister, Baerbock authorized almost half a billion dollars of arms transfers to Israel, nearly half of it after Germany indicated to the International Court of Justice that it would stop.
2
293
Apr 22
Interessant ny terrordom: Deling af højreekstremistisk propagandamateriale på Telegram anses for fremme af terrororganisation et netværk af kanaler (Terrorgram) anses for en terrororganisation i straffelovens forstand. Giver 6 år, fratagelse af indfødsret og udvisning.
1
2
525
Apr 19
Accept af en klart ulovlig iransk “Øresundstold”. Det må siges at være en risikofyldt udgave af pragmatisme.
Apr 19
Proppen i Hormuzstrædet er en »superbegivenhed« for international søfart, mener førende international skibsrådgiver.
Men han peger på en kontroversiel løsning – med et nik til danmarkshistorien. berlingske.dk/videnskab/soef…
382
Marc Schack retweeted
Apr 18
.@antonioguterres strongly condemns the attack on Saturday in which one French peacekeeper serving with @UNIFIL_ in Lebanon was killed and another three were injured, two seriously.
Attacks on peacekeepers must stop.
Full statement: un.org/sg/en/content/sg/stat…
33
59
117
9,061
Marc Schack retweeted
Apr 16
Borgerkrigen i Sudan er gået ind i sit fjerde år som verdens største humanitære katastrofe. FN og menneskerettighedsorganisationer anklager verdenssamfundet for et enormt svigt.
Læs eller lyt: buff.ly/9ZRrRg4
Tekst: Martin Gøttske
Foto: Anders Rye Skjoldjensen
1
1
3
452
Marc Schack retweeted
Apr 16
Jag förstår fortfarande inte vad statsministern menar. Vad är Sveriges linje?
sverigesradio.se/play/artike…
7
12
30
3,333
Apr 16
Fint skriv fra folkeretskollegaerne i Stockholm (link nedenfor). En kritik af den svenske regerings tilgang til folkeretten på det seneste (interessant sammenligningsgrundlag for den danske tilgang) - og en advarsel om risikoen for at miste troværdighed:
3
4
13
640
Apr 16
1
3
241
Apr 14
En ikke helt uinteressant sag om terrorstøtte (lyder som en udvidet medvirkenssigtelse) og billigelse. Hvis salg af tøj med budskaber om 7/10-angrebet anses for terrorbilligelse, så er der vel ikke langt til, at det samme vil være tilfældet, hvis man bærer tøjet eller lignende.
10
26
2,348
Apr 12
Spændende. Så en krig indledes ulovligt (jus ad bellum), udkæmpes ulovligt (jus in bello), fører til ulovlig regulering af et stræde (havret), som fører til en ulovlig blokade (jus ad bellum igen). Mit fag tager godt nok nogle tæsk for tiden.
Trump says US to start blockading the Strait of Hormuz reut.rs/4su8gIK reut.rs/4su8gIK
12
7
82
6,572
Apr 10
Really interesting demographic analysis of violent deaths in Gaza. It compares Gaza to other conflicts and places them all in clusters based on age/sex distributions (Gaza falls in the 'indiscriminate' cluster). I'd recommend watching the video for details and caveats:
1. Yesterday I presented new research on what I'm calling the "demographic fingerprints" of armed conflict — and what they reveal about Gaza.
1
5
23
1,472
Apr 8
This is an excellent piece on the situation in the Strait of Hormuz. I agree that the Iranian transit fee regime is unlawful - but I’m not sure that the transit passage regime can so easily be assumed to simply apply on a customary basis to non-parties to UNCLOS.
Apr 8
The current situation in the Strait of Hormuz is untenable.
The Strait is not "open."
The Iranian toll-collection regime, left in place by Trump-Hegseth deal, is "in flagrant violation of the law of the sea.”
Read this learned piece by former Navy Commander @marknevitt
1/
1
4
686
Apr 8
It is interesting to note, for example, that the Danish jurist, Erik Brüel, argued (in 1940) that when Denmark agreed to stop collecting Sound Dues in 1857, Denmark was essentially giving up a right that no longer existed under international law at the time.
1
2
165
Apr 8
The problem for the US is that it cannot with a straight face rely on such legal norms after having so openly declared its complete disinterest in international law - and after having so clearly violated it in Iran.
1
6
135