On Lawfare Daily, @S_R_Anders, @Claussen_K, @marty_lederman, and @petereharrell discussed the Supreme Court’s opinion which invalidated President Trump's IEEPA tariffs and looked ahead to the legal fights to come over the other tariff authorities the Trump administration is now using to pursue its agenda.
Could not be more thrilled that Liz Magill will be Georgetown Law’s new dean! She is brilliant and kind and a person of deep integrity. @GeorgetownLaw is lucky to get her.
This is simply unadulterated, wonderful news for our school and our students. You'd be hard-pressed to find someone with greater integrity, creativity and thoughtfulness.
M. Elizabeth Magill, the former dean of Stanford Law School, provost of the University of Virginia and president of the University of Pennsylvania, has been named the executive vice president and dean of @GeorgetownLaw: bit.ly/4kFYVeS
Take this in.
"[Admiral] Bradley ... affirmed having sought real-time legal advice, but that he did not say whether his military lawyer considered the survivors shipwrecked and out of the fight."
Has anyone mentioned that if only Kiner-Falefa had run through the plate rather than sliding--which presumably is what he's been taught to do--the Blue Jays would be world champions?
Astonishing blunder--much worse than Buckner. And heartbreaking.
On why Trump's determination that the U.S. is engaged in an armed conflict with drug cartels is (i) wrong; and (ii) insufficient, in any event, to make legal the strikes against vessels in the Caribbean.
justsecurity.org/121844/trum…
Fourth and (for now) final part in my series about the birthright citizenship litigation, this one focusing on the statutory argument that might be the basis of the SCOTUS' ultimate decision when it rules on the petitions the SG filed on Friday.
justsecurity.org/121397/birt…
I can scarcely imagine what it's like to be an operational enlistee or commander directed to comply with such a legally dubious order in this administration. A horrible position to be in. I tease it out a bit in this post.
To understand the enormous significance of the grave line the U.S. military crossed with the strike on the alleged Venezuelan drug boat
A must-read, brilliant and careful analysis by @marty_lederman
Article II, UCMJ, international and domestic law.
An explainer, of sorts, concerning the current debate about whether the UK can and should recognize Palestinian statehood.
justsecurity.org/118655/reac…@ejiltalk
Everything You Always Wanted to Know (and a whole lot you probably didn't!) About Trump v. CASA--and its impact on the pending birthright citizenship litigation. Deep in the weeds ...
justsecurity.org/118040/taki…
"Do you like to see professional golfers lose their shit? If the nine previous U.S. Opens contested at Oakmont are any indication, you are in for a treat this week." Over at the Ringer, I previewed 2025's harsh third major at one of golf's cruelest venues. theringer.com/2025/06/11/gol…
I agree with Nick that Sam's posts are invaluable, even if I don't share Sam's views in every particular. One important thing about today's argument: [1]
If you haven't been reading Sam Bray's series on universal injunctions over at @DividedArgument in preparation for Thursday's oral argument in the birthright citizenship case, you are doing it wrong. (Links below.)
I think Sam underestimates the extent to which the question of whether a universal injunction is necessary/useful to ensure complete relief to the parties themselves will be central to today's argument.
[2]
Sam assumes that "in the cases before the Court, an injunction could protect some plaintiffs from executive action related to birthright citizenship ... without protecting anyone else." But that's far from clear, and that's why it'll be a big part of the argument today. [3]