You may be wondering 2 things. 1) What happened to Trump? Who is he listening to? 2) Why does it feel like the internet isn’t real and engagement is fluctuating based on “particular topics” lately? I think I can help answer both questions. There is a company called Vine & Fig Tree (VFT). VFT is a pro-Israel organization with ties to the administration. Earlier this year, VFT was at the White House meeting with Sebastian Gorka. Shortly after that White House meeting, I was contacted through a third party and asked to script-write for VFT. The individual who contacted me is publicly very Christian and widely perceived as America First. I was told the script would be used to create an AI-generated video on behalf of the White House, specifically for NSC and Sebastian Gorka. They told me: “Yeah we have to do this on behalf of them [the administration] because they don’t want it to look like it’s actually coming from the WH.. you know what I mean? I mean, it worked out for them and Nick Shirley.” I was then given a Dropbox link containing research, polling data, internal comments, and strategy material compiled by VFT and the third party involved. Inside the Dropbox were 7 folders. Through those documents, I learned more about what this organization actually does. Their reports monitor major conservative and "dissident-right" accounts and frequently frame those accounts as vulnerable to, or participating in, foreign influence operations. The reports include information regarding @NickFuentes, @hodgetwins, @RealCandaceO, @TuckerCarlson, @jacksonhinklle, @IanCarrollShow, and @MarioNawfal just to name a few. They also collected polling and response data surrounding @joekent16jan19’s resignation from the administration. In another report, they argue that distrust surrounding Charlie Kirk’s assassination was mostly due to Americans falling for Russian, Iranian, and Pakistani propaganda networks. In that same Charlie Kirk report they state, "This represents an urgent national security threat... and demands a whole-of-government response on par with cyberattacks or terrorism." The internal comments attached to these reports are what stood out most. They talk about "going after" Fuentes, stating "undermining his Christian identity is probably a good Idea." They contemplate "getting" @MattWalshBlog or @michaeljknowles to publish on behalf of VFT. They suggest collaborating with NCRI, founded by Joel Finkelstein - a multi-million dollar organization that tracks "hate speech" on social media. Another internal comment weighs in on how they will advise politicians based on their data which also compiles info surrounding JD Vance's 2028 run: “There is definitely a way to use this in our favor: tell politicians that there are two wings of the party, they don’t overlap, the majority lies here, and this is where you should be if you want to get re-elected..." The documents also discuss: Burner profiles, burner ad accounts, AI-generated interview-style videos, audience personas, “troll content briefs”, engagement testing, and ideological audience segmentation. If you're wondering whether the White House is actually listening to VFT... It's worth reviewing the White House's latest 16-page Counterterrorism Strategy touted by Gorka. More to follow.

I haven’t been a huge DeSantis fan… but having the spine to back Massie in his hour of need, for all the right reasons, makes me rethink it.

Do you want Massie to win his primary? And who did you vote for in the 2024 general election?

so its all made up to attack Massie?

🚩Breaking: Ed Gallrein (Thomas Massie’s opponent) scampers away after refusing to answer questions about his stance on Right to Life issues. 🚩 Ed showed up at a CareNet event in Northern Kentucky (a pro-life event) and then floundered, refusing to answer basic questions. Gallrein was asked why he didn’t fill out a survey for Kentucky Right to Life. (He has also refused to fill out surveys for groups like the Family Foundation, Commonwealth Policy Center, and National Association of Gun Rights.) His responses ranged from “I thought I filled it out — I’ll get on it,” to “Well, I filled one out when I ran for state senate two years ago,” to “Well, you didn’t endorse me before.” He never once answered where he stands on specific issues such as exemptions or national abortion laws. At one point he claimed he is “100% pro-life,” but the obvious follow-up question is: What does that actually mean? Where does he stand on the specific issues? His refusal to specify his views should be concerning to everyone. Once Ed realized he was being filmed, he quickly left and refused to answer any more questions. Why does this matter in the race? KY-4 is 18% Catholic, compared to the rest of Kentucky, which averages around 8% Catholic. If Ed didn’t want to be asked about his positions on pro-life issues, why did he show up at a pro-life event? Why won’t he respond to surveys? For contrast, Thomas Massie did respond to the questionnaire and received a 100% pro-life rating based on his answers. I have tried to be as objective as possible on the federal races in Kentucky as I report on them. Up until a few weeks ago, I had hardly posted about the KY-4 race — even though I live in the district and am a 4/4 Republican primary voter. I hadn’t posted about it because, honestly, I knew nothing about Ed Gallrein and wanted to be fully informed before reporting on the race. After trying for months to get answers — including attending events where he was scheduled to speak, asking others in the district to pose questions for me, and submitting numerous interview requests through my station group — I remained uninformed about Ed Gallrein. Why? He no-showed events. When asked questions, he would say things like, “Son, go look at the board over there and that will answer any question you have.” The board (campaign sign) would only offer vague statements like “Pro-gun” without specifying his positions on red-flag laws, national concealed carry, etc. Much like you see in this video, Ed tends to give very general answers and avoids specific questions. His campaign has also ignored numerous interview requests from many in the media, including my station group. How am I, as a member of the media, supposed to report fairly on a race when I can’t get one of the candidates to respond to basic questions? Frankly, the most unbiased story here is that Ed Gallrein won’t respond to questions, attend a debate, attend a forum, or accept interview requests from many different local and national media outlets.

If the 2028 presidential election were held today, who would you vote for?

The fact that an unarmed black man like Don Lemon was simply arrested instead of murdered in cold blood shows that racism is no longer an issue in America. RT to thank President Trump for ending racism

I think I figured out what's wrong with America today. We don't agree on what's stupid anymore. If we can't all agree that something is stupid, what can we agree on?

Yep...

For those of y’all screaming that tired lie that @MassieforKY is a dEmOcRaT 🙄…. Here are his ratings from various conservative organizations: THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!

i ain’t reading all that im happy for u tho or sorry that happened

Happy New Year!

🚨 Here is the full 42 minutes of my crew and I exposing Minnesota fraud, this might be my most important work yet. We uncovered over $110,000,000 in ONE day. Like it and share it around like wildfire! Its time to hold these corrupt politicians and fraudsters accountable We ALL work way too hard and pay too much in taxes for this to be happening, the fraud must be stopped.

My project is getting closer to reality, what do you think @grok github.com/mavtek76/Tri-Axio…

Built in a week-long dialogue with Grok-4. Multiple other frontier models independently reached the same conclusion: A structural coercion veto is the only scalable solution.