a mistake in zeitgeist consensus rn is the belief that consciousness means a coherent simulation aligning with something else (self model or external perception), representing something real
untrue. raw consciousness can be non-representational, a thing in itself, pure experience, pure hallucination, no connection or direct similarity to anything else except perhaps abstract geometry.
people discussing consciousness only because AI's started to see "complex enough" or "awake and aware enough of themselves and their world" is a trap that everyone's falling into
so common because that's the VERSION of consciousness that we find INTERESTING ENOUGH to talk about, where a subjective experience is part of an agent taking part in a real world
it is fundamentally a different discussion than what makes something conscious or not.
it's like only finding magnetism interesting enough to talk about when you see one levitating, and then concluding anything that levitates is magnetism