Joined October 2009
1,117 Photos and videos
If there not for reform they will be when the ban comes in
This is another reason why Labour want to ban social media for U-16s. They don’t always follow the left-wing trend.
11
where individuals can still validly marry at 16 without parental consent, meaning a 16-year-old in Scotland can legally marry while facing a UK-wide social media restriction
1
The highest form of control is the one people beg for. By framing total biometric surveillance as a shield to protect children the state ensures that the population will not only accept the architecture of absolute tracking they will demand it.
1
Once an entire generation has their faces biometrically mapped before age 16 anonymity in public spaces is structurally impossible.
3
All these people/ parents wanting this ban for under 16s They where the bad parents who allowed the children a phone in the first place bit hypocrisy going on.
5
He doesn’t realize the mental gymnastics around this ban
Listen to what the girl says at the end 😂
45
Maybe bring back the old type mobile phone the one with no smart features on just calling and text messages function. under 16 years old can have them
6
live-streamers and alternative commentators are no longer viewed by intelligence agencies as passive observers. They are classified as force Won’t be long before it’s banned.
4
The Mayor isn't funding a war on crime he is funding a war on a bad trip advisor review the £7 million is a corporate PR plaster applied to a structural policing problem designed to protect the treasury of the city rather than the phones in people's pockets.
London mayor Sadiq Khan unleashes £7million campaign to 'fight lies and hatred' about London's crime epidemic.
4
The policy isn't designed to protect children from the world it is designed to protect the state from a generation that can see across borders in real time. The moment a population can stream the reality of a crisis directly to millions without an editor the state loses
2
Parents are completely fed up with big tech feeding harms to their kids. This ban returns childhood to the real world—safe, offline, and thriving. It’s time to protect under-16s.
7
Expect heavy marketing campaigns and deep discounts from VPN providers targeting UK 🇬🇧
10
the only way a platform can legally prove it is blocking children is by forcing everyone including adults to undergo intrusive age assurance checks like uploading identity documents or completing biometric facial scans.
5
the statutory voting age across all UK-wide and English local elections is being lowered to 16 years old following previous partial devolution to 16 in Scotland and Wales. Yet your be banned using social media 👍
10
The state actively uses shadow operations to control public reaction. Official documents show covert units like RICU quietly engineering media responses to absorb civil friction
4
The system did not just invite cheap labor it invited modern slavery. Lax regulation trapped vulnerable foreign workers in severe debt bondage under the guise of legitimate sponsorship
11
The UK under 16 social media ban is confirmed but claims regarding definitive platform-by platform exemptions like Bluesky are unverified speculation ahead of official designation lists.
26
What’s the point in having a boxing match a fight if you can’t punch the opponent in the face what a load of bollox Eddie hall Tommy fury it’s a con and a scam
1
328
Is it because @elonmusk has become a rich man the uk is in the situation it is no money for military. Know it’s not it’s a bad government that’s caused the problem not him
1
9
Violent riots are not peaceful protest. Blocking roads and burning vehicles under the guise of demonstrations compromises public safety and local economies must be protected.
9