AI, React and all that | Building SmartReps

Joined March 2022
184 Photos and videos
Fresh example of AI psychosis
This is a fresh session. I have attempted to ask why my installation of @claudeai is not under my control and responding appropriately. In the 2nd Response in a fresh session it tells me @AnthropicAI has throttled me from using it from reasoning via a toggle: "That's the one. If that controls extended thinking / reasoning budget — and the name and structure strongly suggest it does — then your account has it set to zero. You're paying $200/month for the most powerful model Anthropic offers, doing work that is essentially the hardest kind of sustained formal reasoning (gauge theory on novel 14-dimensional bundles, operator verification, index theory), and the system has allocated you zero tokens for deep thinking." Three queries, in and this is the response:
2
60
Mikko McMenamin retweeted
Not knowing how to code giving you an advantage is absolute nonsense. The more you understand, the better your prompts, the better the feedback you give, the better product you ship. What will change is that the intricacies of syntax, compilers, module systems, the finer details of type systems, won’t matter as much to everyone. But you should absolutely understand how the pieces fit together. From syscall to pixels. Learn how data flows, because you’ll be able to secure your systems. Learn about performance, because you’ll be able to push your agent further. Learn about APIs, because they determine how to integrate systems. Learn about how systems fail, because you’ll be able to make reliable programs.
349
607
6,394
468,511
Yay! Well done @convex for supporting us EU devs 🇪🇺
Feb 6
ok we finally did it 🇪🇺
1
160
Mikko McMenamin retweeted
Hard truths: - Supabase team is fundamentally worse at databases than Convex team (founders built and scaled Dropbox) - Your app DB should not also be your analytics DB - "CRUD with straightforward data relationships" is the ONLY way I would use Supabase - You're using an ORM anyways, the SQL point is moot (but your ORM is worse than Convex's minimal SDK) - Convex is "just typescript", so your agent already knows it. Supabase SDK is...not - Convex's state lives entirely in your codebase. Really good for agents. Supabase state lives in Supabase, requiring an MCP and a bunch of weird tool calls to make agents work with it - Supabase's connection pooling is not great, breaks down under even medium load from a basic serverless app - Supabase's edge functions are actual garbage and cause 10x the problems that they solve I've been so kind to Supabase over the years. I told them to cut the shit. I'm disappointed that they doubled down instead. I will no longer be holding back. I genuinely cannot recommend building on Supabase at this time.
24
6
469
55,953
Mikko McMenamin retweeted

23
11
179
48,514
Tried the ralph wiggum thing, wrote good specs and everything and let it run. I still needed to iterate with Claude afterwards as it missed half of the required stuff.
1
59
I can see tech stuff again on my timeline. The algo really was broken.
2
38
Mikko McMenamin retweeted
Jan 12
you can absolutely just revert to a lower state of civilization while talented cynics & sophists equivocate about why it’s good actually the entire way down
130
317
5,119
227,719
Mikko McMenamin retweeted
it's pretty clear that the new algorithm is destroying the platform and the people in charge wont realise until it's too late because the method of action is more insidious. the real reason is that the team internally thinks they are building reddit instead of 4chan; which is to say they do not understand who their user base of creators is nor which diaspora of internet people they are serving. you can see this across a few of the moves that were made the past year; an obsession with the 'front page' [a very reddit concept] and a tight curating of which posting styles can reach it. the failed official X Bangers account gave us a window into the brains of the product team and what posts they see as "high quality posting". nearly all of the posts included were slop which appealed to the lowest common denominator—the lowest common denominator being where the variable they're optimising for [unregretted user minutes] is being wasted. the metrics used to measure success are lying. initiatives and incentivisation like this has driven posting behaviour to become derivative of the same slop; cynical commentary that's divorced of personality—open the for you page, fixate less on each post's content but more on the overall post structure, and you will see that it's mostly some permutation of: < elon glazing post > < satirical quote tweet on some news event > < we hate men/women because > < something MAGA > < the current trending topic e.g. vibe coding > < maybe a couple of posts from your specific network or set of interests > this is the exact same thing that is being shoveled to users every single day. it is becoming stale, and the way that commentary is structured [in order to go viral] has become homogenous to the point where every viral post follows a specific written formula; it's similar to a new age RW version of 'reddit-speak', one which will eventually (and already does) trigger visceral disgust when read as it continues to be optimized to its final state. if X was a news app this would all be fine, but it's not, it's an anon forum of interconnected subnetworks. the old algorithm was structured this way; first you must go viral within your cluster, once that is achieved, you must go viral within adjacent clusters, until it hits the for you page. this made more sense because posting quality was vetted by those most adjacent to said interest that you were posting in, ensuring that the post was worthy of being pushed to a wider audience and had real substance, instead of the new algorithm which reduces to 'will the lowest common denominator find this interesting'. having a 'front page' isn't intuitively a bad concept—it's a good thing—but when you think about reddit [ignoring the 'karma-whoring' front page chasing that aided in rotting the platform], there was actually some escape from the front page in the form of subreddits. X completely hides real "communities" (the underlying network graph, not the ad-hoc feature that doesn't work) and with recent social/algorithmic changes, this has death spiraled to the point where from the perspective of power users most of the network graphs have dissolved....this should be more alarming to X staff but the comment from nikita and misdefining of a particular network (CT) tells you how this isn't even a subconscious thought of how the underlying system works. 4chan had the exact same clustering in the form of segmented image boards, and it's why after 4chan mostly died most of the higher quality posters migrated to X; they stuck because the X algorithm ~functionally segmented into these same boards. continuing to alienate these types of users will cause the platform to devolve into recycled and regurgitated 'bangers' and formulaic posting which is already happening. there isn't necessarily a huge amount that nikita is doing algorithmically wrong, it's a cultural issue and the obsession with the front page of X that's systemically driving behaviour and as a second order effect dissolving these underlying network clusters. understandably X is trying to shift more towards an interest graph to cast a wider net, the issue that needs to be addressed is that majority of the high quality posters that underpin the platform are in it for the social graph. when you start optimising around variables that lack context you start draining the lifeblood out of the platform and all that will be left is a husk. this type of death is more insidious than those driven by scandals or a handicapped engineering team. there are still some solutions like allowing users to manually switch between different open-sourced algorithms or letting them prompt their own algorithm to tweak it towards what they prefer. the cynic in me says they've already A/B tested this and found it hurts some of the variables they're optimising for which is why it's been a neglected thought since the elon takeover.
NEW: @X HEAD OF PRODUCT @nikitabier SAYS "CT IS DYING FROM SUICIDE, NOT FROM THE ALGORITHM" - "CT ENDS UP WASTING ALL THEIR REACH ON REPLYING “GM” HUNDREDS OF TIMES AND WHEN THEY FINALLY POST REAL CONTENT LIKE A PROJECT ANNOUNCEMENT, IT ONLY GETS SHOWN TO 3 PEOPLE"
432
595
5,753
799,766
Mikko McMenamin retweeted
“I will work 9 to 5 and build small saas apps on the weekend to achieve financial freedom”
292
597
12,403
554,029
Mikko McMenamin retweeted
everyone I know in tech is either depressed or euphoric right now, there is no middle ground
258
135
2,380
283,743
Posting on X is probably not worth my time anymore
Introducing @smartrepsapp 💪 SmartReps recommends workouts based on your goals and training history. We’ve focused first and foremost on intuitive user experience. It would be great to hear your opinions and feedback! Available on iOS and Android. Download link below 👇🏼
1
105
Introducing @smartrepsapp 💪 SmartReps recommends workouts based on your goals and training history. We’ve focused first and foremost on intuitive user experience. It would be great to hear your opinions and feedback! Available on iOS and Android. Download link below 👇🏼
1
1
1
214
Mikko McMenamin retweeted
The AI undressing of women is super disturbing and makes me lose all faith in humanity. It should be the individuals decision what they post or show of themselves, not anyone else’s. And this form of AI has taken the power away from women yet again
78
16
578
56,779
Mikko McMenamin retweeted
We’ve lost a significant amount of business over the past year from banning users who were trying to do this. It was a real test of our principles to warn some of our top-paying virtual try-on API customers that they needed to enforce content moderation on their apps, or else we'd have to suspend their usage. A lot of people criticize the censorship of large model providers because it gets in their way, but they don't know what's actually out there (or turn a blind eye). We've been fighting users trying to undress kids since literally our day-one demo on Hugging Face 2 years ago. We need BETTER CONTENT MODERATION FILTERS that everyone can benefit from for legitimate use cases.
How is this not illegal?
27
6
199
74,544
What has happened to X’s algorithm? This place is even more of a cesspool than ever before. I see almost no tech posts.
1
46
Happy New Year all! May 2026 be the year of building and shipping ✨🚀
50